Specific Commitments and Other Provisions

Chapter

Learning Objectives

This chapter is to help students understand:
  1. 1.

    Specific commitments under GATS compared with tariff binding under GATT;

     
  2. 2.

    Liberalizing method in service markets under GATS compared with that in goods markets under GATT;

     
  3. 3.

    Withdrawal or modification of specific commitments subject to compensatory adjustment;

     
  4. 4.

    Means by which member countries’ governments maintain measures providing more favorable treatment to their domestic industries compared with foreign entities in the service sector – specifically those committed to being liberalized;

     
  5. 5.

    Two kinds of annexes to GATS;

     

Keywords

Supra Note Market Access Dispute Settlement Natural Person National Treatment 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

Articles

  1. Abu-Akeel AK (1999) Definition of trade in services under the GATS: legal implications. GW J Int’l L & Econ 32Google Scholar
  2. Burr MM (1996) Will the general agreement on trade in services result in international standards for lawyers and access to the world market? Ham line L Rev 20Google Scholar
  3. Cahn S and Schimmel D (1997) The cultural exception: does it exist in GATT and GATS frameworks? how does it affect or is it affected by the agreement on TRIPS? Cardozo Arts & Ent L J 15Google Scholar
  4. Chapman MJ and Tauber PJ (1995) Liberalizing international trade in legal services: a proposal for an annex on legal services under the general agreement on trade in services. Mich J Int’l L 16Google Scholar
  5. Cone SM (1996) International trade in legal services: regulations of lawyers and firms in global practice. Little Brown 2:20–24Google Scholar
  6. Da silve FH (1994) Les Six Points de Mons et Lear Suite, in L’Europe et les Enjeux du GATT dans le Domaine de L’AudiovisuelGoogle Scholar
  7. Jarreau JS (1999) Interpreting the GATS and the WTO instruments relevant to the international trade of financial services: the lawyer’s perspective. N C J Int’l L & Dom 25Google Scholar
  8. Kennedy KC (1998) The GATT-WTO system at fifty. Wis Int’l L J 16Google Scholar
  9. Kilimnki KS (1994) Lawyers abroad: new rules for practice in a global economy. Dick J Int’l L 12:284Google Scholar
  10. Kraus J (1994) The GATT negotiations: a business guide to the results of the Uruguay round. International Chamber of Commerce 43Google Scholar
  11. Ku R (1999) A GATT-ANALOGUE approach to analyzing the consistency of the FCC’s foreign participation order with U.S. GATS MFN comments. GW J Inl’t & Econ 32Google Scholar
  12. Lee ES (2004) Anti-competitive practices as trade barriers used by Korea and Japan: focusing on service and investment market. Bond Law Review 16Google Scholar
  13. Sauve (1995) Assessing the general agreement in trade in services: half-full or half-empty. World Trade 29Google Scholar
  14. Simser J (1996) GATS and financial services: redefining borders. 3 Buff. J Int’l 33Google Scholar
  15. Terry LS (2001) GATS’ Applicability to transnational lawyering and its potential impact on U.S. state regulation of lawyers. Vand J Transnat’l L 34Google Scholar
  16. Trachtman JP (1995) Trade in financial services under GATS, NAFTA and the EC: a regulatory jurisdiction analysis, column. J Transnat’l L 34Google Scholar
  17. Appellate Body Report , EC-Regime for the Importation, Sale and Distribution of Bananas, WT/DS27/AB/R (Sep. 9, 1997).Google Scholar
  18. United Nations, Vienna Convention of the Law of International Treaties, Jan. 27, Art 3.2. 1155 U.N.T.S. 331 (1980)Google Scholar
  19. WTO, General Agreement on Trade in Service, Apr. 15, 1994, Marrakesh Agreement Establishing the World Trade Organization, Annex 1B, Legal Instruments-Results of the Uruguay Round, 33 I.L.M. 1125 (1994).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Division of International TradePusan National UniversityPusanRepublic of South Korea

Personalised recommendations