Cutting Back Models and Simulations

  • Andreas Pyka
  • Simon Deichsel
Part of the Intelligent Systems Reference Library book series (ISRL, volume 44)

Introduction

Agent-based models (ABMs) range from purely theoretical exercises focussing on the patterns in the dynamics of interaction processes to modelling frameworks which are oriented closely at the replication of empirical cases. Advocates of the “Keep it descriptive, stupid!” (KIDS) approach openly recommend building models as empirically accurate as possible, they want to understand social processes from the bottom up.

Keywords

Scientific Realism Realistic Assumption Unrealistic Assumption Predictive Success Correspondence Theory 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Boumans, M.: How to Design Galilean Fall Expermiments in Economics. Philosophy of Science 70, 308–329 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Carnap, R.: Empiricism, semantics and ontology. Revue Internationale de Philosophie 4, transcribed into a pdf by Andrew Chrucky 1997 (1950)Google Scholar
  3. Chwif, L., Barretto, M.R.P., et al.: On simulation model complexity. In: Proceedings of the 32nd Conference on Winter Simulation, pp. 449–455 (2000)Google Scholar
  4. da Costa, N.C.A., French, S.: Partial Truth and Partial Structures. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2002)Google Scholar
  5. Deichsel, S.: Against the pragmatic justification for realism in economic methodology. Erasmus Journal for Philosophy and Economics, 23–41 (2011)Google Scholar
  6. Deichsel, S., Pyka, A.: A pragmatic reading of Friedman’s methodological essay and what it tells us for the discussion of ABMS. Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation 12(4), 6 (2009)Google Scholar
  7. Edmonds, B., Moss, S.: From KISS to KIDS – An ’Anti-simplistic’ Modelling Approach. In: Davidsson, P., Logan, B., Takadama, K. (eds.) MABS 2004. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 3415, pp. 130–144. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Flache, A., Hegselmann, R.: Do Irregular Grids make a Difference? Relaxing the Spatial Regularity Assumption in Cellular Models of Social Dynamics. Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation 4 (2001)Google Scholar
  9. Friedman, M.: The Methodology of Positive Economics. In: Friedman, M. (ed.) Essays in Positive Economics, pp. 3–43. University of Chicago Press, Chicago (1953)Google Scholar
  10. Hausman, D.M.: Essays on Philosophy and Economic Methodology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1992)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Hausman, D.M.: The Inexact and Separate Science of Economics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1992)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Hoover, K.D.: Milton Friedman’s Stance: The Methodology of Causal Realism. Working Paper University of California, Davis 06–6 (2004)Google Scholar
  13. Laudan, L.: Beyond Positivism and Relativism: Theory, Method, and Evidence. Westview Press, Boulder (1996)Google Scholar
  14. Mäki, U.: Entry ’As If’. In: Davis, J.B. (ed.) The Handbook of Economic Methodology, pp. 25–27. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham-Northampton (1998)Google Scholar
  15. Mäki, U.: Kinds of Assumptions and Their Truth: Shaking an Untwisted F-Twist. Kyklos 53/3, 317–335 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Mäki, U.: Realistic realism about unrealistic models. In: Kincaid, H., Ross, D. (eds.) A Handbook of the Philosophy of Economics, pp. 68–98. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2008)Google Scholar
  17. Mäki, U.: Missing the world. Models as isolations and credible surrogate systems. Erkenntnis 70(1), 29–43 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Musgrave, A.: ’Unreal Assumptions’ in Economic Theory: The F-Twist Untwisted. Kyklos 34/3, 377–387 (1981)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Peter, F.: Rhetoric vs realism in economic methodology: a critical assessment of recent contributions. Cambridge Journal of Economics 25(5), 571 (2001)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Putnam, H.: Mind, Language and Reality. Philosophical Papers, vol. 2. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1975)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Quine, W.V.O., Ullian, J.S.: The Web of Belief. McGraw Hill, New York (1970)Google Scholar
  22. Samuelson, P.: Problems of Methodology - Discussion. American Economic Review 54, 232–236 (1963)Google Scholar
  23. Schelling, T.C.: Dynamic Models of Segregation. Journal of Mathematical Sociology 1(2), 143–186 (1971)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Schliesser, E.: Galilean Reflections on Milton Friedman’s “Methodology of Positive Economics”, whith Toughts on Vernon Smiths’s "Economics in the Laboratory". Philosophy of the Social Sciences 35, 50–74 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Schröder, G.: Zwischen Instrumentalismus und kritischem Rationalismus? – Milton Friedmans Methodologie als Basis einer Ökonomik der Wissenschaftstheorie. In: Pies, I., Leschke, M. (eds.) Milton Friedmans Liberalismus, pp. 169–201. Tübingen, Mohr Siebeck (2004)Google Scholar
  26. Tolk, A., Adams, K.M., Keating, C.B.: Towards Intelligence-Based Systems Engineering and System of Systems Engineering. In: Tolk, A., Jain, L.C. (eds.) Intelligence-Based Systems Engineering. ISRL, vol. 10, pp. 1–22. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. van Fraassen, B.C.: The Scientific Image. Oxford University Press, Oxford (1980)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Worrall, J.: Structural Realism - The Best of Both Worlds? Dialectica 43, 99–124 (1989)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Andreas Pyka
    • 1
  • Simon Deichsel
    • 2
  1. 1.University of HohenheimHohenheimGermany
  2. 2.University BremenBremenGermany

Personalised recommendations