Purpose Driven Competency Planning for Enterprise Modeling Projects

  • Janis Stirna
  • Anne Persson
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 7328)


Much of the success of projects using Enterprise Modeling (EM) depends more on the quality of the process of modeling rather than on the method used. One important influence on the quality of the modeling process is the competency level of the experts responsible for the EM approach. Each EM project is, however, specific depending on the purpose of modeling, such as developing the business, ensuring the quality of business operations, and using EM as a problem solving tool. The objective of this paper is to discuss the core competency needs for the EM practitioner and to relate those needs to different purposes of EM.


Enterprise Modeling modeling practitioner competence profile 


  1. 1.
    Persson, A., Stirna, J.: An explorative study into the influence of business goals on the practical use of Enterprise Modelling methods and tools. In: Tenth International Conference on Information Systems Development (ISD 2001), Royal Holloway, University of London, September 5-7 (2001)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bubenko Jr., J.A., Persson, A., Stirna, J.: An Intentional Perspective on Enterprise Modeling. In: Salinesi, C., Nurcan, S., Souveyet, C., Ralyté, J. (eds.) An Intentional Perspective on Enterprise Modeling. Springer (2010) ISBN 978-3-642-12543-0Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Persson, A., Stirna, J.: Towards Defining a Competence Profile for the Enterprise Modeling Practitioner. In: van Bommel, P., Hoppenbrouwers, S., Overbeek, S., Proper, E., Barjis, J. (eds.) PoEM 2010. LNBIP, vol. 68, pp. 232–245. Springer, Heidelberg (2010) ISBN 978-3-642-16781-2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Persson, A.: The Practice of Participatory Enterprise Modelling – a Competency Perspective. In: Johannesson, P., Söderström, E. (eds.) Information Systems Engineering - from Data Analysis to Process Networks, pp. 129–157. Idea Group Inc. (2008) ISBN-13: 978-1-59904-567-2Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bubenko Jr., J.A., Persson, A., Stirna, J.: User Guide of the Knowledge Management Approach Using Enterprise Knowledge Patterns. Deliverable D3, IST Programme project Hypermedia and Pattern Based Knowledge Management for Smart Organisations, project no. IST-2000-28401, Royal Institute of Technology, Sweden (2001)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Glaser, B.G., Strauss, A.L.: The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. Weidenfeld and Nicolson, London (1967)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Stirna, J., Persson, A.: An Enterprise Modeling Approach to Support Creativity and Quality in Information Systems and Business Development. In: Halpin, T., Krogstie, J., Proper, E. (eds.) Innovations in Information Systems Modeling: Methods and Best Practices. IGI Global (2008) ISBN 978-1-60566-278-7Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Yu, E.S.K., Mylopoulos, J.: From E-R to “A-R” - Modelling Strategic Actor Relationships for Business Process Reengineering. In: Loucopoulos, P. (ed.) ER 1994. LNCS, vol. 881, pp. 548–565. Springer, Heidelberg (1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Object Management Group (OMG), Unified Modeling Language (UML) 2.0 (2005)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Wesenberg, H.: Enterprise Modeling in an Agile World. In: Johannesson, P., Krogstie, J., Opdahl, A.L. (eds.) PoEM 2011. LNBIP, vol. 92, pp. 126–130. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Lillehagen, F., Krogstie, J.: Active Knowledge Modeling of Enterprises. Springer (2008) ISBN: 978-3-540-79415-8Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Sandkuhl, K., Lillehagen, F.M.: The Early Phases of Enterprise Knowledge Modelling: Practices and Experiences from Scaffolding and Scoping. In: Stirna, J., Persson, A. (eds.) PoEM 2008. LNBIP, vol. 15, pp. 1–14. Springer, Heidelberg (2008) ISBN 978-3-540-89217-5Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Bridgeland, D.M., Zahavi, R.: Business Modeling: A Practical Guide to Realizing Business Value. Morgan Kaufmann (2009) ISBN: 978-0-12-374151-6Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Lankhorst, M., et al.: Enterprise Architecture at Work: Modelling, Communication and Analysis, 2nd edn. Springer (2009) ISBN 978-3-642-01309-6Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Suikki, R., Tromstedt, R., Haapasalo, H.: Project management competence development frameworkin turbulent business environment. Technovation 26, 723–738 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Gillard, S.: Soft Skills and Technical Expertise of Effective Project Managers. Issues in Informing Science and Information Technology 6 (2009)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Kaarst-Brown, M.L.: Five symbolic roles of the external consultant – Integrating change, power and symbolism. Journal of Organizational Change Management 12(6), 540–561 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Ambler, S.: Agile modeling: Effective practices for extreme programming and the unified process, 1st edn. John Whiley& Sons Inc. (2002) ISBN 978-0471202820Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Zavala, A., Hass, B.H.: The Art and Power of Facilitation: Running Powerful Meetings, Management Concepts. Inc., Vienna, USA (2008) ISBN 9781567262124Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Albertsen, T., Sandkuhl, K., Seigerroth, U., Tarasov, V.: The Practice of Competence Modelling. In: van Bommel, P., Hoppenbrouwers, S., Overbeek, S., Proper, E., Barjis, J. (eds.) PoEM 2010. LNBIP, vol. 68, pp. 106–120. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Janis Stirna
    • 1
  • Anne Persson
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Computer and Systems SciencesStockholm UniversityKistaSweden
  2. 2.Informatics Research CentreUniversity of SkövdeSkövdeSweden

Personalised recommendations