Raw Materials for Business Processes in Cloud

  • Marite Kirikova
  • Ilze Buksa
  • Ludmila Penicina
Part of the Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing book series (LNBIP, volume 113)

Abstract

The commonalities and differences between business processes of enterprises depend on the level of abstraction at which the processes are represented. At the lower levels of abstraction the processes are complex and their variations cannot be shown by business process frames of higher levels of abstraction. However there are some parts of processes that are common to many enterprises or several units in an enterprise, for instance, the process parts which must conform to particular regulations. The paper proposes an approach for managing regulation dependent business process parts in cloud. The purpose of the approach is to minimize the total time, which enterprises use for incorporation of regulations in their business processes.

Keywords

business process regulations services regulations graph 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Basel Committee on Banking Supervision, Basel II Accord, http://www.bis.org/publ/bcbsca.htm
  2. 2.
    Kharbili, M.E.: Business process regulatory compliance management solution frameworks: a comparative evaluation. Accepted for The Eighth Asia-Pacific Conference on Conceptual Modelling (APCCM 2012) (2012)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Olbrich, S., Simon, C.: Integration of legal constraints into business process models. Transforming Government, People, Process and Policy 1(2), 194–210 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Veal, G.J., Mouzas, S.: Changing the rules of the game: Business responses to new regulation. Industrial Marketing Management 40(2), 290–300 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Boer, A., van Engers, T.: AGILE: From source of law to business process. In: Casellas, N., Francesconi, E.C., Hoekstra, R., Montemagni, S. (eds.) Proceedings of the Third Workshop on Legal Ontologies and Artificial Intelligence Techniques, Held in Conjunction with the Workshop on Semantic Processing of Legal Texts, Barcelona, Spain, June 8 (2009), http://ceur-ws.org/Vol-465/
  6. 6.
    Governori, G.: Law, Logic and business processes. In: Proceedings of the 2010 Third International Workshop on Requirements Engineering and Law (RELAW), pp. 1–10 (2010)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Awad, A., Weidlich, M., Weske, M.: Visually specifying compliance rules and explaining their violations for business processes. Journal of Visual Languages and Computing 22, 30–55 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Kharbili M.E.: Business process regulatory compliance management solution frameworks: a comparative evaluation. Accepted for the Eighth Asia-Pacific Conference on Conceptual Modelling (APCCM 2012) (2012) Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Law About Accounting (in Latvian) (2011), http://www.likumi.lv/doc.php?id=66460
  10. 10.
    Marston, S., Bandyopadhyay, S., Ghalsasi, A.: Cloud computing — The business perspective. Decision Support Systems 51, 176–189 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Badger, L., Grance, T., Patt-Corner, R., Voas, J.: DRAFT Cloud Computing Synopsis and Recommendations, http://csrc.nist.gov/publications/drafts/800-146/Draft-NIST-SP800-146.pdf
  12. 12.
    XML process definition language (XPDL) specification, Workflow Management Coalition, http://www.wfmc.org
  13. 13.
    van der Aalst, W.M.P.: Patterns and XPDL: A Critical Evaluation of the XML Process Definition Language, Eindhoven University of Technology, http://www.workflowpatterns.com/documentation/documents/ce-xpdl.pdf
  14. 14.
    Stephen, A.W.: XPDL and BPMN, SeeBeyond, United States (2003)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
  16. 16.
  17. 17.
  18. 18.
    Supply Chain Operation Reference Model, http://supply-chain.org/f/SCOR-Overview-Web.pdf
  19. 19.
  20. 20.
    Basel Committee on Banking Supervision, Basel II Accord, http://www.bis.org/publ/bcbsca.htm
  21. 21.
    Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, Public Law 107-204 (116 Statute 745), United States Senate and House of Representatives in Congress (2002), http://www.soxlaw.com/
  22. 22.
    Control Objectives for Information and Related Technology (COBIT), http://www.isaca.org/Knowledge-Center/COBIT/Pages/Overview.aspx
  23. 23.
    Weilkiens, T.: OCEB Certification Guide: Business Process Management - Fundamental Level. The MK/OMG Press (2011)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Object Management Group, http://www.omg.org/
  25. 25.
    Business Motivation Model (BMM), http://www.omg.org/spec/BMM/
  26. 26.
    Model Systems: Overview of OMG Business Motivation Model: Core Concepts, http://www.omg.org/oceb/BMM_Overview-Core_Concepts_[081208].pdf Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Jeston, J., Nelis, J.: Business Process Management: Practical Guidelines to Successful Implementations. Elsevier Ltd. (2008)Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Juric, M.B., Pant, K.: Business Process Driven SOA using BPMN and BPEL. Packt Publishing (2008)Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Silver, B.: BPMN Method and Style. Cody-Cassidy Press (2009)Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Chinosi, M., Trombetta, A.: BPMN: An introduction to the standard. Computer Standards & Interfaces 34, 124–134 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Marite Kirikova
    • 1
  • Ilze Buksa
    • 1
  • Ludmila Penicina
    • 1
  1. 1.Institute of Applied Computer SystemsRiga Technical UniversityLatvia

Personalised recommendations