Advertisement

Growing into Agility: Process Implementation Paths for Scrum

  • Kevin Vlaanderen
  • Peter van Stijn
  • Sjaak Brinkkemper
  • Inge van de Weerd
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 7343)

Abstract

Background: Many organizations struggle with the implementation of agile methods. Such methods pose considerable challenges related to organizational demand and process configuration. Goal: In this paper, we analyze the introduction of Scrum in the development organization in order to determine distinct approaches to its implementation. Approach: We compare the Scrum introduction paths of four case companies. Results: This results in a discussion of implementation paths ranging from gradual to disruptive introduction of Scrum. Contribution: The description of these paths provides insight into process improvements. We demonstrate how a structured description of process improvements can improve understanding of process improvement paths.

Keywords

software process improvement Scrum product software incremental process implementation 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Abrahamsson, P., Warsta, J., Siponen, M.T., Ronkainen, J.: New directions on agile methods: a comparative analysis. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Software Engineering, pp. 244–254. IEEE (2003)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Beck, K.: Extreme programming explained: embrace change. Addison-Wesley Longman Publishing Co., Inc., Boston (1999)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Beck, K., Beedle, M., van Bennekum, A., Cockburn, A., Cunningham, W., Fowler, M., Grenning, J., Highsmith, J., Hunt, A., Jeffries, R., Kern, J., Marick, B., Martin, R.C., Mellor, S., Schwaber, K., Sutherland, J., Thomas, D.: Agile Manifesto (2001), http://www.agilemanifesto.org
  4. 4.
    Boehm, B., Turner, R.: Balancing agility and discipline: a guide for the perplexed. Pearson Education, Boston (2004)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Boehm, B., Turner, R.: Management Challenges to Implementing Agile Processes in Traditional Development Organizations. IEEE Software 22(5), 30–39 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Borjesson, A., Mathiassen, L.: Successful process implementation. IEEE Software 21(4), 36–44 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Cohn, M., Ford, D.: Introducing an Agile Process to an Organization. Computer 36(6), 74–78 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Dingsøyr, T., Hanssen, G.K., Dybå, T., Anker, G., Nygaard, J.O.: Developing Software with Scrum in a Small Cross-Organizational Project. In: Richardson, I., Runeson, P., Messnarz, R. (eds.) EuroSPI 2006. LNCS, vol. 4257, pp. 5–15. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Dyba, T., Dingsøyr, T.: Empirical studies of agile software development: A systematic review. Information and Software Technology 50(9-10), 833–859 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Fitzgerald, B., Hartnett, G., Conboy, K.: Customising agile methods to software practices at Intel Shannon. European Journal of Information Systems 15(2), 200–213 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Jansen, S., Brinkkemper, S.: Applied Multi-Case Research in a Mixed-Method Research Project: Customer Configuration Updating Improvement. In: Cater-Steel, A., Al-Hakimi, L. (eds.) Information Systems Research Methods, Epistemology, and Applications, pp. 120–139. IGI Global, Utrecht (2007)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Krzanik, L., Jouni, S.: Is my software process improvement suitable for incremental deployment? In: Proceedings of the International Workshop on Software Technology and Engineering Practice, London, UK, pp. 76–87 (2002)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Livermore, J.A.: Factors that Significantly Impact the Implementation of an Agile Software Development Methodology. Journal of Software 3(4), 31–36 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Moe, N.B., Aurum, A.: Understanding Decision-Making in Agile Software Development: A Case-study. In: Proceedings of the Conference on Software Engineering and Advanced Applications, pp. 216–223. IEEE (September 2008)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Nerur, S., Mahapatra, R., Mangalaraj, G.: Challenges of Migrating to Agile Methodologies. Communications of the ACM 48(2), 72–79 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Pettersson, F., Ivarsson, M., Gorschek, T., Ohman, P.: Packaging software process improvement issues: a method and a case study. Software Practice and Experience 34(14), 1311–1344 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Salo, O., Abrahamsson, P.: Agile methods in European embedded software development organisations: a survey on the actual use and usefulness of Extreme Programming and Scrum. IET Software 2(1), 58 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Salo, O.: Enabling Software Process Improvement in Agile Software Development Teams and Organisations. VTT Publications 618(618), p. 153 (2006)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Sawyer, P., Sommerville, I., Viller, S.: Requirements process improvement through the phased introduction of good practice. Software Process: Improvement and Practice 3(1), 19–34 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Schwaber, K.: Agile Project Management with Scrum. Microsoft Press, Redmond (2004)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Scotland, K., Boutin, A.: Integrating scrum with the process framework at yahoo! europe. In: Proceedings of the AGILE Conference. pp. 191–195. IEEE (2008)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Sidky, A.S.: A Structured Approach to Adopting Agile Practices: The Agile Adoption Framework (June 2007)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Smits, H., Pshigoda, G.: Implementing Scrum in a Distributed Software Development Organization. Management, 371–375 (2007)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Stapleton, J.: DSDM: Dynamic Systems Development Method. In: Proceedings of the Technology of Object-Oriented Languages and Systems, p. 406. IEEE Computer Society, Washington, DC (1999)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    van Stijn, P., Vlaanderen, K., Brinkkemper, S., van de Weerd, I.: Documenting Evolutionary Process Improvements with Method Increment Case Descriptions (submitted for publication, 2012)Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Vlaanderen, K., Jansen, S., Brinkkemper, S., Jaspers, E.: The Agile Requirements Refinery: Applying SCRUM Principles to Software Product Management. Information and Software Technology 53(1), 58–70 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Vlaanderen, K., van de Weerd, I., Brinkkemper, S.: Improving Software Product Management: a Knowledge Management Approach. International Journal of Business Information Systems (in print, 2012)Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    van de Weerd, I.: Advancing in software product management: An incremental method engineering approach. Ph.D. thesis, Utrecht University (2009)Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    van de Weerd, I., Brinkkemper, S., Versendaal, J.: Concepts for Incremental Method Evolution: Empirical Exploration and Validation in Requirements Management. In: Krogstie, J., Opdahl, A.L., Sindre, G. (eds.) CAiSE 2007 and WES 2007. LNCS, vol. 4495, pp. 469–484. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Yin, R.K.: Case Study Research - Design and Methods. SAGE Publications (2003)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kevin Vlaanderen
    • 1
  • Peter van Stijn
    • 1
  • Sjaak Brinkkemper
    • 1
  • Inge van de Weerd
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Information and Computing SciencesUtrecht UniversityUtrechtThe Netherlands
  2. 2.Faculty of Economics and Business AdministrationVrije Universiteit AmsterdamAmsterdamThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations