Advertisement

Persuasive Technology Considered Harmful? An Exploration of Design Concerns through the TV Companion

  • Wolfgang Reitberger
  • Florian Güldenpfennig
  • Geraldine Fitzpatrick
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 7284)

Abstract

Persuasive Technology has great potential to positively influence users in a wide variety of areas such as health, well-being and environmental sustainability. However, concerns have been raised regarding issues such as surveillance, lack of autonomy and coercion that might be involved with the application of such technologies. This paper articulates a set of design concerns around these themes and presents a study of the TV Companion, an instance of a behavior change system that takes into account these concerns. The TV Companion is an application aimed to address the societal issue of prolonged TV consumption with its related potential negative effects and aims to foster more reflective TV viewing among children and their parents. To explore the application of these design approaches in a real world setting we report the findings of a field study of the TV companion in three families with pre-school children and reflect on how the design concerns shaped the experience and use of the TV companion.

Keywords

design concerns autonomy surveillance coercion TV viewing families prototype field study 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Obermair, C., Reitberger, W., Meschtscherjakov, A., Lankes, M., Tscheligi, M.: perFrames: Persuasive Picture Frames for Proper Posture. In: Oinas-Kukkonen, H., Hasle, P., Harjumaa, M., Segerståhl, K., Øhrstrøm, P. (eds.) PERSUASIVE 2008. LNCS, vol. 5033, pp. 128–139. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Lin, J.J., Mamykina, L., Lindtner, S., Delajoux, G., Strub, H.B.: Fish’n’Steps: Encouraging Physical Activity with an Interactive Computer Game. In: Dourish, P., Friday, A. (eds.) UbiComp 2006. LNCS, vol. 4206, pp. 261–278. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Consolvo, S., McDonald, D.W., Toscos, T., Chen, M.Y., Froehlich, J., Harrison, B., Klasnja, P., LaMarca, A., LeGrand, L., Libby, R., Smith, I., Landay, J.A.: Activity sensing in the wild: a field trial of ubifit garden. In: Proceedings CHI 2008, pp. 1797–1806. ACM, Florence (2008)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Gustafsson, A., Katzeff, C., Bang, M.: Evaluation of a pervasive game for domestic energy engagement among teenagers. Computers in Entertainment 7, 1 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Veerman, J.L., Healy, G.N., Cobiac, L.J., Vos, T., Winkler, E.A.H., Owen, N., Dunstan, D.W.: Television viewing time and reduced life expectancy: a life table analysis. British Journal of Sports Medicine (2011)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Lillard, A.S., Peterson, J.: The Immediate Impact of Different Types of Television on Young Children’s Executive Function. Pediatrics (2011)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Education, C.o.P.: Children, Adolescents, and Television. Pediatrics 107, 423–426 (2001) Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Hofkirchner, W., Tscheligi, M., Bichler, R., Reitberger, W.: Ambient Persuasion for the Good Society. IRIE 8, 42–46 (2007)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    DiSalvo, C., Sengers, P., Brynjarsdóttir, H.N.: Mapping the landscape of sustainable HCI. In: Proceedings CHI 2010, pp. 1975–1984. ACM, Atlanta (2010)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Friedman, B., Kahn, P., Borning, A.: Chapter 16: Value Sensitive Design and Information Systems. In: Human-Computer Interaction and Management Information Systems: Applications, pp. 348–372 (2006)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Fogg, B.J.: Persuasive Technology: Using Computers to Change What We Think and Do. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc. (2003)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Oinas-Kukkonen, H., Harjumaa, M.: Persuasive Systems Design: Key Issues, Process Model, and System Features. Communications of the Association for Information Systems 24 (2009)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Kaptein, M., Duplinsky, S., Markopoulos, P.: Means based adaptive persuasive systems. In: Proceedings of the 2011 Annual Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 335–344. ACM, Vancouver (2011)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Purpura, S., Schwanda, V., Williams, K., Stubler, W., Sengers, P.: Fit4life: the design of a persuasive technology promoting healthy behavior and ideal weight. In: Proceedings of the 2011 Annual Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 423–432. ACM, Vancouver (2011)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Reitberger, W., Ploderer, B., Obermair, C., Tscheligi, M.: The PerCues Framework and Its Application for Sustainable Mobility. In: de Kort, Y.A.W., IJsselsteijn, W.A., Midden, C., Eggen, B., Fogg, B.J. (eds.) PERSUASIVE 2007. LNCS, vol. 4744, pp. 92–95. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Leth Jespersen, J., Albrechtslund, A., Øhrstrøm, P., Hasle, P., Albretsen, J.: Surveillance, Persuasion, and Panopticon. In: de Kort, Y.A.W., IJsselsteijn, W.A., Midden, C., Eggen, B., Fogg, B.J. (eds.) PERSUASIVE 2007. LNCS, vol. 4744, pp. 109–120. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Foucault, M.: Discipline and punish: the birth of the prison. Vintage Books, New York (1995)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Wolfgang Reitberger
    • 1
  • Florian Güldenpfennig
    • 1
  • Geraldine Fitzpatrick
    • 1
  1. 1.Institute for Design & Assessment of TechnologyVienna University of TechnologyViennaAustria

Personalised recommendations