TechnoStress in the 21st Century; Does It Still Exist and How Does It Affect Knowledge Management and Other Information Systems Initiatives

Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 172)

Abstract

This paper critically evaluates the impact and consequences of TechnoPhobia and TechnoStress (Rosen and Weil 1995) on public and corporate ICT policy makers. This research is set in the context of government ministries in Malta and performed by Aquilina in 2010/2011, as part of his MSc Dissertation. It is of particular significance in indicating how little has changed in the perceptions of ICT users surveyed as to their levels of acceptance and trust or distrust in ICT in their work and recreation, using the CARS and GATS scales of Rosen and Weil. It intimates that the problem may have got worse. The fact that 56% of the respondents in Malta showed some degree of technophobia should be of particular concern to policy makers. The consequences of Technophobia need to be incorporated into the policy making forum to ensure more effective ICT systems are developed.

Keywords

Techno-phobia techno-stress ICT Policy Government Corporate Public Acceptance CARS GATS CTS 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bocij, P., Greasley, A., Hickie, S.: Business Information Systems: Technology. Development and Management for the E-Business. Prentice-Hall (2008)Google Scholar
  2. Brosnan, M.: Technophobia: The psychological impact of information technology. Routledge (1998)Google Scholar
  3. Dede, C.: Planning for Neo-millennial Learning Styles. EDUCAUSE Quarterly 1, 7–12 (2005); EU. About ICT Policy Support Programme (2007), http://ec.europa.eu/information_society/activities/ict_psp/about/index_en.htm (accessed February 12, 2012) Google Scholar
  4. Gauld, R., Goldfinch, S., Horsburgh, S.: Do they want it? Do they use it? The ‘Demand-Side’ of e-Government in Australia and New Zealand. Government Information Quarterly 27(2), 177–186 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Gilbert, D., Lee-Kelley, L., Barton, M.: Technophobia, gender influences and consumer decision-making for technology-related products. European Journal of Innovation Management 6(4), 253–263 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Heinssen Jr, R.K., Glass, C., Knight, L.A.: Assessing computer anxiety: Development and validation of the Computer Anxiety Rating Scale. Computers in Human Behavior 3(1), 49–59 (1987)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. McIlroy, D., Bunting, B., Tiernet, K., Gordon, M.: The relation of gender and background experience to self-reported computing anxieties and cognitions. Computers in Human Behavior 17(1), 21–33 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. North, A.S., Noyes, J.M.: Gender influences on children’s computer attitudes and cognitions. Computers in Human Behavior 18(2), 135–150 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Rosen, L., Weil, M.: Measuring Technophobia. In: A Manual for the Administration and Scoring of the Computer Anxiety Rating Scale (Form C), the Computer Thoughts Survey (Form C) and the General Attitudes Toward Computers Scale (Form C). California State University (1992)Google Scholar
  10. Rosen, L., Weil, M.: Computer availability, computer experience andtechnophobia among public school teachers. Computers in Human Behavior 11(1), 9–31 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Sami, L.K., Pangannaiah, N.B.: “Technostress” A literature survey on the effect of information technology on library users. Library Review 55(7), 429–439 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Self, R., Goh, W.W.: Addressing The Challenges Of Low ICT Literacy In UK University Students, e-Learning Africa, Dakar (2009)Google Scholar
  13. Shashaani, L.: Gender-based differences in attitudes toward computers. Computers & Education 20(2), 169–181 (1993)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Standish Group, The Chaos Report, The Standish Group International Inc. (1994)Google Scholar
  15. Standish Group, Unfinished Voyages, The Standish Group International Inc. (1995)Google Scholar
  16. Standish Group, Chaos: A Recipe for Success, The Standish Group International Inc. (1999)Google Scholar
  17. Standish Group, Chaos Rising, The Standish Group International Inc. (2005)Google Scholar
  18. Standish Group. Chaos Newsroom 2009, The Standish Group International Inc. (2009), http://www1.standishgroup.com/newsroom/chaos_2009.php (accessed February 19, 2012)
  19. Ugwo, L.O., Oyebisi, T.O., Ilori, M.O., Adagunodo, E.R.: Organisational impact of information technology on the banking and insurance sector in Nigeria. Technovation 20(12), 711–721 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Wang, K., Shu, Q., Tu, Q.: Technostress under different organizational environments: An empirical investigation. Computers in Human Behavior 24(6), 3002–3013 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Weil, M., Rosen, L.: The psychological impact of technology from a global perspective: A study of technological sophistication and technophobia in university students from twenty-three countries. Computers in Human Behavior 11(1), 95–133 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Weil, M., Rosen, L.: TechnoStress: Coping with Technology @work @home @play. John Wiley and Sons (1997)Google Scholar
  23. Wilson, R.: On Hold, Channel 4 TV, January 12 (2012), http://www.channel4.com/programmes/richard-wilson-on-hold/4od (accessed February 12, 2012)

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of DerbyDerbyUnited Kingdom
  2. 2.Government of MaltaMaltaMalta

Personalised recommendations