Advertisement

Cloud Blueprints for Integrating and Managing Cloud Federations

  • Michael P. Papazoglou
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 7365)

Abstract

Contemporary cloud technologies face insurmountable obstacles. They follow a pull-based, producer-centric trajectory to development where cloud consumers have to ‘squeeze and bolt’ applications onto cloud APIs. They also introduce a monolithic SaaS/PaaS/IaaS stack where a one-size-fits-all mentality and vendor lock-in prevail. As a consequence consumers cannot mix and match functionality from diverse tiers of the cloud stack – horizontally or vertically – dynamically configuring it to address their needs.

This paper presents an approach that overcomes these obstacles by providing an innovative reference architecture, an enhanced cloud delivery model which breaks down the rigidity of the cloud stack and transforms it into modular and easily combined components, and a complete integration and management environment that offers integration-as-a-service functionality.

Keywords

Cloud computing delivery models cloud integration cloud management cloud service abstraction mechanisms cloud service composability service contracts 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Bittman, T.J.: The Road from Virtualization to Cloud Computing. Technical Report, Gartner (2011)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Breiter, G., Behrendt, M.: Life Cycle and Characteristics of Services in the World of Cloud Computing. IBM Systems Journal 53(4), 3:1–3:8 (2009)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Chieu, T.C., Mohindra, A., Karve, A., Segal, A.: Solution-based deployment of complex application services on a Cloud. In: International Conference on Service Operations and Logistics and Informatics, pp. 282–287. IEEE Computer Society, Washington DC (2010)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Dikaiakos, M., Katsaros, D., Mehra, P., Pallis, G., Vakali, A.: Cloud Computing: Distributed Internet Computing for IT and Scientific Research. IEEE Internet Comput. 13(5), 10–13 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Distributed Management Task Force (ed.): Interoperable Clouds. White Paper, DMTF (2009)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Elmroth, E., Larsson, L.: Interfaces for Placement, Migration, and Monitoring of Virtual Machines in Federated Clouds. In: 8th International Conference on Grid and Cooperative Computing, pp. 253–260. IEEE Computer Society, Washington DC (2009)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    EMC (ed.): EMC’s IT Journey to the Cloud. White Paper, EMC (2011)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Fehling, C., Mietzner, R.: Composite as a Service: Cloud Application Structures, Provisioning, and Management. IT - Information Technology 53(4), 188–194 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Galán, F., Sampaio, A., Rodero-Merino, L., Loy, I., Gil, V., Vaquero, L.M.: Service Specification in Cloud Environments Based on Extensions to Open Standards. In: 4th International Conference on Communication System Software and Middleware. ACM, New York (2009)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Goldsack, P., Guijarro, J., Loughran, S., Coles, A., Farrell, A., Lain, A., Murray, P., Toft, P.: The SmartFrog configuration management framework. SIGOPS Oper. Syst. Rev. 43(1), 16–25 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Konstantinou, A.V., Eilam, T., Kalantar, M., Totok, A.A., Arnold, W., Snible, E.: An Architecture for Virtual Solution Composition and Deployment in Infrastructure Clouds. In: 3rd International Workshop on Virtualization Technologies in Distributed Computing, pp. 9–18. ACM, New York (2009)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Kurze, T., Klems, M., Bermbach, D., Lenk, A., Tai, S., Kunze, M.: Cloud Federation. In: 2nd International Conference on Cloud Computing, GRIDs, and Virtualization, pp. 32–38. ThinkMind (2011)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    MacVittie, L.: Fog of Definitions Hides Hybrid Cloud’s Truth. ZDNet UK (2010), http://www.zdnet.co.uk/news/cloud/2010/08/20/fog-of-definitions-hides-hybrid-clouds-truth-40089810/
  14. 14.
    OASIS Topology and Orchestration Specification for Cloud Applications (TOSCA) TC, http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/tc_home.php?wg_abbrev=tosca
  15. 15.
    Parameswaran, A.V., Chaddha, A.: Cloud Interoperability and Standardization. SETLabs Briefings 7(7), 19–26 (2009)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Papazoglou, M.P., van den Heuvel, W.J.: Blueprinting the Cloud. IEEE Internet Comput. 15(6), 74–79 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Papazoglou, M.P.: Web Services and SOA: Principles and Technology, 2nd edn. Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River (2012)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Papazoglou, M.P., Vaquero, L.M.: Knowledge-Intensive Cloud Services: Transforming the Cloud Delivery Stack. In: Kantola, J., Karwowski, W. (eds.) Knowledge Service Engineering Handbook, pp. 449–494. CRC Press (2012)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Rodero-Merino, L., Vaquero-González, L.-M., Cáceres-Expósito, J.-A., Hierro-Sureda, J.-J.: SOA and Cloud Technologies. CEPIS Upgrade 11(4), 25–29 (2010)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Virtualization Management (VMAN), http://www.dmtf.org/standards/mgmt/vman/

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Michael P. Papazoglou
    • 1
  1. 1.European Research Institute in Service ScienceTilburg UniversityThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations