A Middleware for Pervasive Situation-Awareness

  • Graham Thomson
  • Sotirios Terzis
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 7272)

Abstract

Situation-awareness is the ability of applications to adapt to the current situation of their users. For situation-awareness to be truly pervasive it should support the individual needs of every user, everywhere. We present a middleware for pervasive situation-awareness based on the idea of separating the features of a situation from the specification of how it should be recognised. The features of a situation can be seen as an interface that can be easily customised to satisfy individual user needs, while alternative specifications can be used to recognise a situation in different environments. The middleware views situations as collections of roles that individuals and devices play. Its implementation follows an agent-based architecture where collaborating agents acquire and reason over context data. We also show that the middleware can recognise a variety of highly customised situations using alternative specifications with performance that is acceptable for interactive situation-aware applications in realistic deployment sizes.

Keywords

Context Information Round Trip Time Pervasive Computing Pervasive Computing Environment Situation Recognition 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. 1.
    Albinali, F., Davies, N., Friday, A.: Structural learning of activities from sparse datasets. In: Fifth Annual IEEE International Conference on Pervasive Computing and Communications (PerCom 2007), pp. 221–228 (2007)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Cook, D.J., Das, S.K.: Pervasive computing at scale: Transforming the state of the art. Pervasive and Mobile Computing 8(1), 22–35 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Coutaz, J., Crowley, J.L., Dobson, S., Garlan, D.: Context is key. Communications of the ACM 48(3), 49–53 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Henricksen, K., Indulska, J.: Developing context-aware pervasive computing applications: Models and approach. Pervasive and Mobile Computing 2(1), 37–64 (2006), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pmcj.2005.07.003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Jennings, N.R., Wooldridge, M.J.: Applications of Intelligent Agents. In: Jennings, N.R., Wooldridge, M.J. (eds.) Agent Technology: Foundations, Applications, and Markets, pp. 3–28. Springer, Heidelberg (1998) Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kumar, M., Shirazi, B.A., Das, S.K., Sung, B.Y., Levine, D., Singhal, M.: Pico: A middleware framework for pervasive computing. IEEE Pervasive Computing 2(3), 72–79 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Meyer, B.: The many faces of inheritance: A taxonomy of taxonomy. IEEE Computer 29(5), 105–108 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Patterson, D.J., Liao, L., Fox, D., Kautz, H.: Inferring High-Level Behavior from Low-Level Sensors. In: Dey, A.K., Schmidt, A., McCarthy, J.F. (eds.) UbiComp 2003. LNCS, vol. 2864, pp. 73–89. Springer, Heidelberg (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Ranganathan, A., Al-Muhtadi, J., Campbell, R.H.: Reasoning about uncertain contexts in pervasive computing environments. IEEE Pervasive Computing 3(2), 62–70 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Roy, N., Roy, A., Das, S.K.: Context-Aware Resource Management in Multi-Inhabitant Smart Homes: A Nash H-Learning based Approach. In: Proceedings of the Fourth Annual IEEE International Conference on Pervasive Computing and Communications (PerCom 2006), pp. 148–158 (2006)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Tapia, E.M., Intille, S.S., Larson, K.: Activity Recognition in the Home Using Simple and Ubiquitous Sensors. In: Ferscha, A., Mattern, F. (eds.) PERVASIVE 2004. LNCS, vol. 3001, pp. 158–175. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Thomson, G.: A Model and Architecture for Pervasive Situation Determination. Ph.D. thesis, University of Strathclyde (2010)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Ye, J., Coyle, L., Dobson, S., Nixon, P.: Using situation lattices in sensor analysis. In: PerCom, pp. 1–11 (2009)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Ye, J., Dobson, S., McKeever, S.: Situation identification techniques in pervasive computing: A review. Pervasive and Mobile Computing 8(1), 36–66 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© IFIP International Federation for Information Processing 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Graham Thomson
    • 1
  • Sotirios Terzis
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Computer and Information SciencesUniversity of StrathclydeGlasgowUK

Personalised recommendations