Advertisement

The Implications of the Skin Model Concept for Computer Aided Tolerancing

  • Benjamin SchleichEmail author
  • Sandro Wartzack
Part of the Lecture Notes in Production Engineering book series (LNPE)

Abstract

During product origination many deviations occur which manifest in unreliable functional behaviour and reduced product quality. Thus, the observable geometric deviations have to be limited by geometric tolerances of function-relevant part features. In this context the standards for Geometrical Product Specification and Verification (GPS) provide helpful tools for geometric tolerancing. A basic concept within these standards is the skin model concept which can be understood as a model of the physical interface between the workpiece and its environment. Recent research tries to translate this concept into discrete geometry and focuses upon the technical aspects related to generating skin model shapes, whereas the implications of this concept and emerging simulation possibilities for the geometric variations management process stay disregarded. Therefore, this paper highlights the consequences of the skin model concept and modern simulation tools for the computer aided tolerancing process and the management of geometric deviations during product development.

Keywords

Skin model geometric variations management tolerance management computer aided tolerancing 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Dantan, J.Y., Anwer, N., Mathieu, L.: Integrated tolerancing process for conceptual design. CIRP Annals - Manufacturing Technology 52(1), 135–138 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Dantan, J.Y., Ballu, A., Mathieu, L.: Geometrical product specifications – model for product life cycle. Computer Aided Design 40, 493–501 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    EN ISO 17450-1:2011: Geometrical product specifications (gps) – general concepts – part 1: Model for geometrical specification and verification (2011)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Zhang, M., Anwer, N., Mathieu, L., Zhao, H.: A discrete geometry framework for geometrical product specifications. In: Proceedings of the 21st CIRP Design Conference (2011)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Mathieu, L., Ballu, A.: A model for a coherent and complete tolerancing process. In: Davidson, J.K. (ed.) Models for Computer Aided Tolerancing in Design and Manufacturing, pp. 35–44. Springer Netherlands (2007)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Boothroyd, G., Dewhurst, P.: Product Design for Manufacture and Assembly. Marcel Dekker, New York (1994)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Ceglarek, D., Huang, W., Zhou, S., Ding, Y., Kumar, R., Zhou, Y.: Time-based competition in multistage manufacturing: Stream-of-variation analysis (sova) methodology-review. International Journal of Flexible Manufacturing Systems 16, 11–44 (2004)zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Shin, S., Kongsuwon, P., Cho, B.R.: Development of the parametric tolerance modeling and optimization schemes and cost-effective solutions. European Journal of Operational Research 207, 1728–1741 (2010)MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Pahl, G., Beitz, W., Feldhusen, J., Grote, K.: Konstruktionslehre. Springer (2007)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Heng, Z., Yanlong, C., Yanding, W., Jiangxin, Y.: A concurrent design method for functional tolerance and structure based on the principle of decomposition and reconstitution. In: Proceedings of the 12th CIRP Conference on Computer Aided Tolerancing (2012)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Roy, U., Pramanik, N., Sudarsan, R., Sriram, R., Lyons, K.: Function-to-form mapping: model, representation and applications in design synthesis. Computer Aided Design 33, 699–719 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Charpentier, F., Ballu, A., Pailhes, J.: A scientific point of view of a simple industrial tolerancing process. In: Proceedings of the 12th CIRP Conference on Computer Aided Tolerancing (2012)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Hong, Y.S., Chang, T.C.: A comprehensive review of tolerancing research. International Journal of Production Research 40(11), 2425–2459 (2002)zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Wartzack, S., Meerkamm, H., Stockinger, A., Stoll, T., Stuppy, J., Voß, R., Walter, M., Wittmann, S.: Lebenszyklusorientierte Toleranzsimulation zur funktionalen und ästhetischen Produktabsicherung. Konstruktion 6, 63–74 (2011)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Mathieu, L., Ballu, A.: Univocal expression of functional and geometrical tolerances for design, manufacturing and inspection. In: 4th CIRP Seminar on Computer Aided Tolerancing, pp. 31–46 (1995)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Schleich, B., Anwer, N., Mathieu, L., Walter, M., Wartzack, S.: A comprehensive framework for skin model simulation. In: Proceedings of the ASME 2012 11th Biennial Conference on Engineering Systems Design and Analysis (2012)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Armillotta, A., Semeraro, Q.: Geometric Tolerance Specification. In: Geometric Tolerances – Impact on Product Design, Quality Inspection and Statistical Process Monitoring. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Stoll, T., Wittmann, S., Meerkamm, H.: Tolerance Analysis with detailed Part Modeling. In: Giordano, M., Mathieu, L., Villeneuve, F. (eds.) Product Life-Cycle Management. Geometric Variations (2010)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Samper, S., Adragna, P.A., Favreliere, H., Pillet, M.: Modeling of 2d and 3d assemblies taking into account form errors of plane surfaces. Journal of Computing and Information Science in Engineering 9(4) (2009)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Walter, M., Wartzack, S.: Analysis of the effects of manufacturing-caused deviations and varying operation parameters on operation-depending deviations of systems in motion. In: Proceedings of the 12th CIRP Conference on Computer Aided Tolerancing (2012)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Schleich, B., Stockinger, A., Wartzack, S.: On the impact of geometric deviations on the structural performance. In: Proceedings of the 12th CIRP Conference on Computer Aided Tolerancing (2012)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Chair of Engineering DesignFriedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-NurembergErlangenGermany

Personalised recommendations