Embodiment Discrete Processing

  • Sebastian Pena Serna
  • Andre Stork
  • Dieter W. Fellner
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Production Engineering book series (LNPE)

Abstract

The phases of the embodiment stage are sequentially conceived and in some domains even cyclic conceived. Nevertheless, there is no seamless integration between these, causing longer development processes, increment of time lags, loss of inertia, greater misunderstandings, and conflicts. Embodiment Discrete Processing enables the seamless integration of three building blocks. 1) Dynamic Discrete Representation: it is capable to concurrently handle the design and the analysis phases. 2) Dynamic Discrete Design: it deals with the needed modeling operations while keeping the consistency of the discrete shape. 3) Dynamic Discrete Analysis: it efficiently maps the dynamic changes of the shape within the design phase, while streamlining the interpretation processes. These integrated building blocks support the multidisciplinary work between designers and analysts, which was previously unusual. It creates a new understanding of what an integral processing is, whose phases were regarded as independent. Finally, it renders new opportunities toward a general purpose processing.

Keywords

Embodiment Design Analysis Dynamic Meshes Mesh Modifications 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Lee, K.: Principles of CAD/CAM/CAE Systems. Addison-Wesley (1999)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Pahl, G., Beitz, W.: Engineering Design: A Systematic Approach, 2nd edn. Springer, London (1996)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Labelle, F., Shewchuk, J.R.: Isosurface stuffing: Fast tetrahedral meshes with good dihedral angles. ACM Transactions on Graphics 26(3), 57.1–57.10 (2007)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Klingner, B.M., Shewchuk, J.R.: Aggressive tetrahedral mesh improvement. In: Proceedings of the 16th International Meshing Roundtable, IMR, Seattle, USA, pp. 3–23 (October 2007)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Hughes, T.J.R., Cottrell, J.A., Bazilevs, Y.: Isogeometric analysis: Cad, finitr elements, nurbs, exact geometry and mesh refinement. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Engrg. 194, 4135–4195 (2005)MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Verhoosel, C.V., Scott, M.A., Borden, M.J., Hughes, T.J.R., de Borst, R.: Discretization of higher-order gradient damage models using isogeometric finite elements. ICES Report 11-12, The Institute for Computational Engineering and Sciences, The University of Texas at Austin (May 2011) Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Athanasiadis, T., Fudos, I., Nikou, C., Stamati, V.: Feature-based 3d morphing based on geometrically constrained sphere mapping optimization. In: Proceedings of the 2010 ACM Symposium on Applied Computing, SAC 2010, pp. 1258–1265. ACM, New York (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Wicke, M., Ritchie, D., Klingner, B.M., Burke, S., Shewchuk, J.R., O’Brien, J.F.: Dynamic local remeshing for elastoplastic simulation. ACM Trans. Graph. 29(4), 49:1–49:11 (2010)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Serna, S.P., Stork, A.: Computer design in computational mechanics. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Computing, Engineering and Information, ICC 2009, pp. 329–332. IEEE Computer Society, Los Alamitos (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Serna, S.P., Stork, A.: Mesh-based modeling towards engineering analysis. In: Proceedings of NAFEMS World Congress: The Analysis Advantage: Perspectives on Engineering Simulation for Today and Beyond, NWC 2009, pp. 1–11. NAFEMS, Glasgow (2009)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Serna, S.P., Stork, A., Fellner, D.W.: Tetrahedral mesh-based embodiment design. In: Proceedings of the ASME International Design Engineering Technical Conferences & Computers and Information in Engineering Conference, IDETC CIE 2010, vol. 3, pp. 131–140. ASME, New York (2010)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Serna, S.P., Stork, A., Fellner, D.W.: Embodiment mesh processing. In: Fischer, X., Nadeau, J.-P. (eds.) Research in Interactive Design. Virtual, Interactive and Integrated Product Design and Manufacturing for Industrial Innovation. IDMME - Virtual Concept 2010, vol. 3, pp. 1–6. Springer, Berlin (2010)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Serna, S.P., Stork, A., Fellner, D.W.: Interactive exploration of design variations. In: Proceedings of the NAFEMS World Congress: A World of Engineering Simulation: Industrial Needs, Best Practice, Visions for the Future, NWC 2011, pp. 1–18. NAFEMS, Glasgow (2011)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sebastian Pena Serna
    • 1
  • Andre Stork
    • 1
    • 2
  • Dieter W. Fellner
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Fraunhofer IGDDarmstadtGermany
  2. 2.TU DarmstadtDarmstadtGermany

Personalised recommendations