Advertisement

A Usability Protocol for Evaluating Online Social Networks

  • Kyle Boyd
  • Chris Nugent
  • Mark Donnelly
  • Roy Sterritt
  • Raymond Bond
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 7251)

Abstract

Online Social Networking (OSN) has become one of the biggest successes of the Internet. Facebook is the most popular service with over 800 million users. OSN have the potential to combat feelings of social isolation amongst the aging population. This study has investigated how people with differing levels of experience using OSN, within different age categories, are able to interact with the core features of Facebook. The goal has been to identify concessions and produce guidelines for designing an OSN for older people. This paper presents quantitative findings from a usability study which utilized eye tracking to observe 20 users’ interactions with Facebook. The usability issues that were encountered and how these may be addressed to help older people with social isolation are discussed.

Keywords

Social Isolation Web 2.0 Online Social Networks Facebook Usability Eyetracking 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Barreto, C.: What comes after Web 2.0? In: XML Conference and Exposition (2007)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Murugesan, S.: Understanding Web 2.0. IT Professional 9, 34–41 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
  4. 4.
  5. 5.
    Nielsen, J., Pernice, K.: Eyetracking web usability. Newriders (2010)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Nielsen, J.: Usability Components, http://www.useit.com/alertbox/20030825.html
  7. 7.
    Nielsen, J.: Designing web usability. Newriders (2006)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Krug, S.: Don’t make me think! A common sense approach to web usability, 2nd edn. Newriders, Berkley (2009)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Office of National Statistics,: Statistical Bulletin, Old Peoples Day P1 (2010)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Rogers, R., Peres, Y., Müller, W.: Living Longer Independently – a Healthcare Interoperability Perspective 127, 206–211 (2010)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Alzheimer’s Disease International: World Alzheimer Report (2010)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Wilson, D.W., Lin, X., Longstreet, P., et al.: Web 2.0: A Definition, Literature Review, and Directions for Future Research. In: AMCIS 2011 Proceedings, Paper 368 (2011)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Xie, B., Huang, M., Watkins, I.: Technology and retirement life: A systematic review of the literature on older adults and social media. In: Wang, M. (ed.) The Oxford Handbook of Retirement. Oxford University Press (2011)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Mellor, D., Firth, L., Moore, K.: Can the Internet Improve the Well-being of the Elderly? Ageing Int. 32, 25–42 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Shapira, N., Barak, A., Gal, I.: Promoting Older Adults’ Well-being through Internet Training and use. Aging & Mental Health 11, 477–484 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Goswami, S., Köbler, F., Leimeister, J.M., et al.: Using Online Social Networking to Enhance Social Connectedness and Social Support for the Elderly, Paper 109 (2010)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Office of National Statistics, http://www.ons.gov.uk/ons/

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kyle Boyd
    • 1
  • Chris Nugent
    • 1
  • Mark Donnelly
    • 1
  • Roy Sterritt
    • 1
  • Raymond Bond
    • 1
  1. 1.Computer Science Research InstituteUniversity of UlsterJordanstownNorthern Ireland

Personalised recommendations