Real-Time Alarm Management System for Emergency Situations

Conference paper
Part of the Studies in Computational Intelligence book series (SCI, volume 431)


In this paper, we present an alarm management system focused on guiding offshore platform operators’ attention to the essential information that calls for immediate action during emergency situations. Due to the imminent associated danger involved in the petroleum operation domain, only well trained workers are allowed to operate in offshore oil process plants. Although their vast experience, human errors may happen during emergency situations as a result of the overwhelmed amount of information generated by a great deal of triggered alarms. Alarm devices have become very cheap leading petroleum equipment manufacturers to overuse them transferring safety responsibility to operators. Not rarely, accident reports cite poor operators’ understanding of the actual plant status due to too many active alarms. A petroleum process plant can be understood as a system composed of a set of equipments interacting with each other to transform and conduct safely a fluid. Each equipment has its own set of rules and safety devices (alarms). The system is subjected to external, non-predictable, effects coming from nature. Hence, the petroleum process plant system can be represented as a set of agents with rules for acting, reacting and interacting with each other. Each equipment is represented as an agent. This AI multi-agent based approach is the basis of our alarm management system for assisting operators to make sense of alarm avalanche scenarios. Our model was implemented using stored procedure statements, installed into the automation circuit of a actual offshore petroleum platform and we are currently collecting results. During initial tests we identified unexpected benefits concerning verification of the process plant automation procedure.


emergency situations alarm management multi-agent systems oil industry 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Health and Safety Executive, The explosion and fires at the Texaco Refinery, Milford Haven July 24, 1994: A report of the investigation by the Health and Safety Executive into the explosion and fires on the Pembroke Cracking Company Plant at the Texaco Refinery, Milford Haven on July 24, 1994 (1997), ISBN 071761413 1Google Scholar
  2. 2.
  3. 3.
    Ajudante cai dentro de silo de soja e morre asfixiado, Brasil (August 31, 2002),
  4. 4.
    Frente Nacional dos Petroleiros, Histórico dos Acidentes e Mortes na Petrobras– 02 de outubro de (2008),
  5. 5.
    Murez, J., Berwanger, P.C.: Apparatus and method for performing process hazard analysis. US Patent 7, 716, 239 (2010)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Asea Brown Boveri (ABB),
  7. 7.
  8. 8.
    Rabuzin, K., Maleković, M., Baca, M.: A Combination of Reactive and Deliberative agents in Hospital Logistics. In: The Proceedings of 17th International Conference on Information and Intelligent Systems, Vara’Min, Croatia, pp. 63–70 (2006)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Rabuzin, K., Maleković, M., Cubrilo, M.: Resolving Physical Conflicts in Multiagent Systems. In: The Third International Multi-Conference on Computing in the Global Information Technology, ICCGI 2008, pp. 193–199. IEEE (2008)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Rabuzin, K., Maleković, M.: Efficient Trigger Management in Multiagent Systems. In: Central European Conference on Information and Intelligent Systems (2008)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Computer Science InstituteFluminense Federal UniversityNiteróiBrazil
  2. 2.Computer Science DepartmentCarlos III University of MadridMadridSpain

Personalised recommendations