Impact of ATLAS Jet Data on PDF Fits

  • Caterina Doglioni
Chapter
Part of the Springer Theses book series (Springer Theses)

Abstract

The knowledge of parton distribution functions is a fundamental input to theoretical predictions in hadronic collisions. The uncertainty on the PDFs feeds into the theoretical uncertainty on the inclusive jet cross section, as shown in the previous chapter. It also impacts new physics measurements in terms of e.g. the QCD background model used and expected production cross sections

Keywords

Systematic Uncertainty Deep Inelastic Scattering Parton Distribution Function Gluon Distribution Valence Quark 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. 1.
    W. J. Stirling, Private communication. http://www.hep.phy.cam.ac.uk/wjs/plots/plots.html
  2. 2.
    H1 and ZEUS Collaboration, V. Radescu, Combination and QCD analysis of the HERA inclusive cross sections, PoS ICHEP2010 168 (2010) . http://pubdb.desy.de/fulltext/getfulltext.php?uid=13358-38069
  3. 3.
    S. Forte, Parton distributions at the dawn of the LHC. Acta Phys. Polon. B41, 2859—2920 (2010), arXiv:1011.5247 [hep-ph]Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    A. Sherstnev, R.S. Thorne, Parton distributions for LO generators. Eur. Phys. J. C55, 553–575 (2008), arXiv:0711.2473 [hep-ph]Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    A.D. Martin, W.J. Stirling, R.S. Thorne, G. Watt, Parton distributions for the LHC. Eur. Phys. J. C63, 189–285 (2009), arXiv:0901.0002 [hep-ph]Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    J. Pumplin et al., New generation of parton distributions with uncertainties from global QCD analysis. JHEP 07, 012 (2002), arXiv:0201195 [hep-ph]Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    H.-L. Lai et al., New parton distributions for collider physics. Phys. Rev. D82, 074024 (2010) , arXiv:arXiv:1007.2241 [hep-ph]Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    R. D. Ball et al., A first unbiased global NLO determination of parton distributions and their uncertainties. Nucl. Phys. B838, 136–206 (2010), arXiv:arXiv:1002.4407 [hep-ph]Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    ATLAS Collaboration, Comparisons of the measured inclusive jet cross section to a selection of NLO QCD predictions, and a study of the parton content of the calculations, ATL-PHYS-PUB-2011-005, CERN, Geneva, Apr, 2011Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    M. Botje, Error estimates on parton density distributions. J. Phys. G28, 779–790 (2002), arXiv:0110123 [hep-ph]Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    D. Stump et al., Uncertainties of predictions from parton distribution functions 1. The Lagrange multiplier method. Phys. Rev. D65, 014012 (2001), arXiv:0101051 [hep-ph]Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    H1 Collaboration, Measurement of the inclusive ep scattering cross sections at low \(Q^2\) and \(x\) at HERA. Eur. Phys. J. C63, 625–678 (2009), arXiv:0904.0929 [hep-ex]Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    H1 and ZEUS Collaboration, F.D. Aaron et al., Combined Measurement and QCD analysis of the inclusive ep scattering cross sections at HERA. JHEP 01, 109, (2010), arXiv:0911.0884 [hep-ex]Google Scholar
  14. 14.
  15. 15.
    CHORUS Collaboration Collaboration, A. Kayis-Topaksu et al., Leading order analysis of neutrino induced dimuon events in the CHORUS experiment. Nucl .Phys. B798, 1–16, (2008), arXiv:0804.1869 [hep-ex]Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Particle Data Group Collaboration, C. Amsler et al., Review of particle physics. Phys. Lett. B667, 1–1340 (2008)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    R. Thorne, R. Roberts, An ordered analysis of heavy flavor production in deep inelastic scattering. Phys. Rev. D57, 6871–6898 (1998), arXiv:9709442[hep-ph]Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    R. Thorne, A variable-flavor number scheme for NNLO. Phys. Rev. D73, 054019 (2006), arXiv:0601245[hep-ph]Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    M. Botje, QCDNUM: Fast QCD evolution and convolution. Comput. Phys. Commun. 182, 490–532 (2011), arXiv:1005.1481 [hep-ph]Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    J. Collins, Renormalization: An Introduction to Renormalization, the Renormalization Group and the Operator-Product Expansion, (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1984)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    H. Flacher et al., Revisiting the global electroweak fit of the standard model and beyond with gfitter. Eur. Phys. J. C60, 543–583 (2009), arXiv:0811.0009 [hep-ph].[Erratum-ibid.C71:1718,2011]Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    GFitter Collaboration, Results for the Global Electroweak Standard Model Fit, including latest results from July 2011 (EPS11), http://gfitter.desy.de/Standard_Model/
  23. 23.
    H1 and Z. collaborations, QCD analysis and determination of \(\alpha _s\) using the combined H1 and ZEUS inclusive cross sections together with the jet production cross section measured by the H1 and the ZEUS experiments, H1prelim-11-034, ZEUS-prel-11-001, DESY, Hamburg, Nov, 2010Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    S. Whitehead, A Measurement of the \(W\) Boson Charge Asymmetry with the ATLAS Detector. PhD thesis, 2011Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Caterina Doglioni
    • 1
  1. 1.University of OxfordOxfordUK

Personalised recommendations