Knowledge-Based Policing: Augmenting Reality with Respect for Privacy

Part of the Studies in Applied Philosophy, Epistemology and Rational Ethics book series (SAPERE, volume 3)

Abstract

Contemporary information-led policing (ILP) and its derivative, knowledge-based policing (KBP) fail to deliver value at the edge of action. In this chapter we will argue that by designing augmented realities, information may become as intertwined with action as it can ever get. To this end, however, the positivist epistemological foundation of the synthesized world (and ILP and KBP for that matter) has to be brought into line with the interpretive-constructivist epistemological perspective of every day policing. Using a real-world example of the Dutch National Police Services Agency (KLPD) we illustrate how augmented reality may be used to identify and intercept criminals red-handedly. Subsequently we discuss how we think that the required data processing can be brought into line with the legislative requirements of subsidiarity, proportionality, and the linkage between ends and means, followed by a discussion about the consequences for, among other things, privacy, discrimination, and legislation.

Keywords

Police Officer Augmented Reality Boundary Object License Plate Coffee Shop 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Abrio. Informatiegestuurde politie: sturen op resultaat. Abrio, Houten (2005)Google Scholar
  2. Alpert, G.P., MacDonald, J.K., Dunham, R.G.: Police suspicion and discretionary decision making during citizen stops. Criminology 43(2), 407–434 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Arbib, M.A.: Memory limitations of stimulus-response models. Psychological Review 76, 507–510 (1969)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bateson, G.: Mind and nature: a necessary unity, advances in systems theory, complexity, and the human sciences. Hampton Press (1979)Google Scholar
  5. Bechky, B.A.: Sharing meaning across occupational communities: the transformation of understanding on a production floor. Organization Science 14(3), 312–330 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bentham, J.: The panopticon writings. In: Bozovic, M. (ed.), pp. 29–95, Verso, London (1843 - 1995)Google Scholar
  7. Boisot, M., Li, L.: Codification, abstraction, and firm differences: a cognitive information-based perspective. Journal of Bioeconomics 7, 309–334 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Boutellier, H.: Nodale orde: veiligheid en burgerschap in een netwerkmaatschappij. Inaugurele Rede 19 September 2007. Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam (2007)Google Scholar
  9. Brodeur, J.P., Dupont, B.: Knowledge workers or “knowledge” workers? Policing and Society 16(1), 7–26 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cannon-Bowers, J.A., Salas, E., Converse, S.: Shared mental models in expert team decision making. In: Castellan Jr., N.J. (ed.) Individual and Group Decision Making, pp. 221–246. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale (1993)Google Scholar
  11. Carlile, P.R.: A pragmatic view of knowledge and boundaries: boundary objects in new product development. Organization Science 13(4), 442–455 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Carter, D.L.: Law enforcement intelligence: a guide for state, local, and tribal law enforcement agencies. Office of Community Oriented Policing Services, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC (2004)Google Scholar
  13. Castells, M.: The information age, economy, society and culture: the rise of the network society, 2nd revised edn. Blackwell Publishers (2000)Google Scholar
  14. Centrex: Guidance on the National Intelligence Model. ACPO (2005)Google Scholar
  15. Dean, G., Fahsing, I.A., Glomseth, R., Gottschalk, P.: Capturing knowledge of police investigations: towards a research agenda. Police Practice and Research 9(4), 341–355 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Feiner, S., MacIntyre, B., Seligmann, I.: Knowledge-based augmented reality. Communications of the ACM 36(7), 53–62 (1993)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Fritzmaurice, G.W.: Situated information spaces and spatiality aware Palmtop computers. Communications of the ACM 36(7), 39–49 (1993)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Galbraith, J.R.: Designing complex organizations. Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, Massachusetts (1973)Google Scholar
  19. Gottschalk, P.: Organizational structure as predictor of intelligence strategy implementation in policing. International Journal of Law, Crime and Justice 36, 184–195 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Gottschalk, P.: Knowledge management in policing: enforcing law on criminal business enterprises. Hindawi Publishing Corporation, New York (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hert, P., de Huisman, W., Vis, T.: Intelligence led policing ontleed. Tijdschrift voor Criminologie 47(4), 365–375 (2005)Google Scholar
  22. Holgersson, S., Gottschalk, P.: Police officers’ professional knowledge. Police Practice and Research 9(5), 365–377 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Innes, M., Fielding, N., Cope, N.: The appliance of science? The theory and practice of crime intelligence analysis. British Journal of Criminology 45, 39–57 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Jacobs, B.: Select before you collect. Ars Aequi 54 (2005)Google Scholar
  25. Janis, I.L.: Victims of groupthink: a psychological study of foreign-policy decisions and fiascoes. Houghton Mifflin College, Boston (1972)Google Scholar
  26. KLPD: Tussenraportage II: Flexibele teams. Internal report KLPD (2011)Google Scholar
  27. Kop, N., Klerks, P.: Doctrine intelligencegestuurd politiewerk. Politieacademie. Lectoraat Recherchekunde, Apeldoorn (2009)Google Scholar
  28. Kruger, M.: Artificial Reality H. Addison-Wesley, Reading (1991)Google Scholar
  29. Lint, W.: Intelligence in policing and security: reflections on scholarship. Policing and Society 16(1), 1–6 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Maguire, M.: Policing by risks and targets: Some dimensions and implications of intelligence-led crime control. Policing and Society 9, 315–336 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Makkai, T., Ratcliffe, J.H., Veraar, K., Collins, L.: ACT recidivist offenders. Research and Public Policy Series 54, 83 (2004)Google Scholar
  32. Marx, G.T., Reichman, N.: Routinizing the discovery of secrets: computers as informants. American Behavioral Scientist 27(4), 423–452 (1984)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Migram, P., Takemura, H., Utsumi, A., Kishino, F.: Augmented reality: a class of displays on the reality-virtuality continuum. Telemanipulator and Telepresence Technologies 2351, 282–292 (1994)Google Scholar
  34. Nissen, M.E.: Harnessing knowledge dynamics: principled organizational knowing and learning. IRM Press (2006)Google Scholar
  35. Orlikowski, W.J.: Knowing in practice: enacting a collective capability in distributed organizing. Organization Science 13(3), 249–273 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Puonti, A.: Foreword. In: Gottschalk, P. (ed.) Knowledge Management Systems in Law Enforcement. Idea Group Publishing, Hershey (2007)Google Scholar
  37. Ratcliffe, J.H.: Integrated intelligence and crime analysis: enhanced information management for law enforcement leaders. In: COPS, Police Foundation, Washington, DC (2007)Google Scholar
  38. Ratcliffe, J.H.: Intelligence-led policing. In: Wortley, R., Mazerolle, L., Rombouts, S. (eds.) Environmental Criminology and Crime Analysis. Willan Publishing, Cullompton (2008a)Google Scholar
  39. Ratcliffe, J.H.: Knowledge management challenges in the development of information-led policing. In: Williamson, T. (ed.) The Handbook of Knowledge-Based Policing: Current Conceptions and Future Directions. John and Wiley and Sons, Chihester (2008)Google Scholar
  40. Reding, V.: Privacy platform: the review of the EU data protection framework. Press Releases, Speech/11/183, March 16 (2011)Google Scholar
  41. Shannon, C.E.: A mathematical theory of communication. Reprinted with corrections from The Bell System Technical Journal 27, 379–423, 623–656 (1948)Google Scholar
  42. Skousen, M.: The right to be left alone. Ideas on Liberty, 4–5 (May 2002), http://www.fee.org/pdf/the-freeman/skousen0502.pdf (accessed August 30, 2011)
  43. Star, S.L.: The structure of ill-structured solutions: boundary objects and heterogeneous distributed problem solving. In: Huhns, M., Gasser, L. (eds.) Readings in Distributed Artificial Intelligence. Morgan Kaufman, Menlo Park (1989)Google Scholar
  44. Star, S.L., Griesemer, J.R.: Institutional ecology, “translations” and boundary objects: amateurs and professionals in Berkeley’s Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, 1907-1939. Social Studies and Science 19, 387–420 (1989)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Thatcher, D.: The local role of homeland security. Law and Society Review 39, 635–676 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Tsoukas, H.: Knowledge as action, organization as theory: reflections on organizational knowledge. Emergence 2(4), 104–112 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Tuomi, I.: Corporate knowledge: theory and practice of intelligence organization, Helsinki, Metaxis (1999)Google Scholar
  48. Tyler, T.R., Wakslak, C.J.: Profiling and police legitimacy: procedural justice, attributions of motive, and acceptance of police authority. Criminology 42(2), 253–281 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Walsh, J.P., Ungson, G.R.: Organizational memory. The Academy of Management Review 16(1), 57–91 (1991)Google Scholar
  50. Warren, P., Tomaskovic-Devey, D., Smith, W., Zingraff, M., Mason, M.: Driving while black: bias processes and racial disparity in police stops. Criminology 44(3), 709–738 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Wbp, Wet bescherming persoonsgegevens, Article 12, http://wetten.overheid.nl/BWBR0011468/geldigheidsdatum_17-11-2011 (accessed November 17, 2011)
  52. Weiser, M.: Some computer science issues in ubiquitous computing. Communications of the ACM 36(7), 75–84 (1993)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Williamson, T. (ed.): The handbook of knowledge-based policing, current conceptions and future directions (2008)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jan-Kees Schakel
    • 1
  • Rutger Rienks
    • 1
  • Reinier Ruissen
    • 1
  1. 1.National Policing Services AgencyAmsterdamThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations