Variable Risk and the Evolution of the Defense Repertoire of the Tupelo Leafminer

Chapter

Abstract

 

Keywords

Natural Enemy Predation Event Predator Interaction Mine Size Multiple Defense 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Abrams PA (2003) Can adaptive evolution or behaviour lead to diversification of traits determining a trade-off between foraging gain and predation risk? Evol Ecol Res 5:653–670Google Scholar
  2. Askew RR, Shaw MR (1974) Account of Chalcidoidea (Hymenoptera) parasitizing leaf-mining insects of deciduous trees in Britain. Biol J Linn Soc 6:289–335Google Scholar
  3. Auerbach M, Simberloff D (1989) Oviposition site preference and larval mortality in a leaf-mining moth. Ecol Entomol 14:131–140CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bacher S, Casas J, Dorn S (1996) Parasitoid vibrations as potential releasing stimulus of evasive behaviour in a leafminer. Physiol Entomol 21:33–43CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Beldade P, Mateus ARA, Keller RA (2011) Evolution and molecular mechanisms of adaptive developmental plasticity. Mol Ecol 20:1347–1363PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Benrey B, Denno RF (1997) The slow-growth-high-mortality hypothesis: a test using the cabbage butterfly. Ecology 78:987–999Google Scholar
  7. Broom M, Higginson AD, Ruxton GD (2010) Optimal investment across different aspects of anti-predator defences. J Theor Biol 263:579–586PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Casas J (1989) Foraging behavior of a leafminer parasitoid in the field. Ecol Entomol 14:257–265CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Casas J, Bacher S, Tautz J, Meyhofer R, Pierre D (1998) Leaf vibrations and air movements in a leafminer-parasitoid system. Biol Control 11:147–153CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Connor EF, Cargain MJ (1994) Density-related foraging behaviour in Closterocerus tricinctus, a parasitoid of the leaf-mining moth, Cameraria hamadryadella. Ecol Entomol 19:327–334CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Connor EF, Taverner MP (1997) The evolution and adaptive significance of the leaf-mining habit. Oikos 79:6–25CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Djemai I, Casas J, Magal C (2001) Matching host reactions to parasitoid wasp vibrations. In: Proceedings of the Royal Society Biological Sciences Series B, vol 268, London, pp 2403–2408Google Scholar
  13. Djemai I, Casas J, Magal C (2004) Parasitoid foraging decisions mediated by artificial vibrations. Anim Behav 67:567–571CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Djemai I, Meyhöfer R, Casas J (2000) Geometrical games between a host and a parasitoid. Am Nat 156:257–265CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Endler JA (1980) Natural selection on color patterns in Poecilia reticulata. Evolution 34:76–91CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Endler JA (1986) Defense against predators. In: Feder ME, Lauder GV (eds) Predator-prey relationships: perspectives and approaches from the study of lower vertebrates. University of Chicago Press, Chicago and London, pp 109–134Google Scholar
  17. Faeth SH (1990) Aggregation of a leafminer, Cameraria, new species (Davis): consequences and causes. J Anim Ecol 59:569–586CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Gates MW, Heraty JM, Schauff ME, Wagner DL, Whitfield JB, Wahl DB (2002) Survey of the parasitic hymenoptera on leafminers in California. J Hymenoptera Res 11:213–270Google Scholar
  19. Ghalambor CK, Walker JA, Reznick DN (2002) Multi-trait selection, adaptation, and constraints on the evolution of performance: an empirical example using Trinidadian guppies. Integr Comp Biol 42:1234–1234Google Scholar
  20. Hamilton WD (1964) The genetical evolution of social behavior. I, II. J Theor Biol 7(1–16):17–52PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hering EM (1951) Biology of leaf miners. Berlin’s-Gravenhage, GermanyGoogle Scholar
  22. Hill PSM (2001) Vibration and animal communication: a review. Am Zool 41:1135–1142CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Johnson WT, Lyon HH (1991) Insects that feed on trees and shrubs, Cornell University Press, IthacaGoogle Scholar
  24. Krause J, Ruxton GD (2002) Living in groups: ecology and evolution. Oxford University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  25. Low C (2008a) Grouping increases visual detection risk by specialist parasitoids. Behav Ecol 19:532–538CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Low C (2008b) Seismic behaviors of a leafminer, Antispila nysaefoliella (Lepidoptera: Heliozelidae). Fla Entomol 91:604–609Google Scholar
  27. Low C (2010) The presence of active larvae delays the emergence of conspecifics in the tupelo leafminer, Antispila nysaefoliella. Evol Ecol Res 12:545–553Google Scholar
  28. Low C (2012) An experimental test of the seismic behaviors of Antispila nysaefoliella (Lepidoptera: Heliozelidae). Fla Entomol 95:16–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Low C, Scheffer SJ, Lewis ML, Gates MW (2012) The relationship between variable host grouping and functional responses among parasitoids of Antispila nysaefoliella (Lepidoptera: Heliozelidae). (In review)Google Scholar
  30. Low C, Wood SN, Nisbet RM (2009) The effects of group size, leaf size & density on larval performance. J Anim Ecol 78:152–160PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Mappes J, Marples NM, Endler JA (2005) The complex business of survival by aposematism. Trends Ecol Evol 20:598–603PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Meyhöfer R, Casas J (1999) Vibratory stimuli in host location by parasitic wasps. J Insect Physiol 45:967–971PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Morris DW (2011) Adaptation and habitat selection in the eco-evolutionary process. In: Proceedings of the Royal Society B-Biological Sciences, London, vol 278 pp 2401–2411Google Scholar
  34. Pearson DL (1989) What is the adaptive significance of multicomponent defensive repertoires. Oikos 54:251–253CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Reznick D, Endler JA (1982) The impact of predation on life history evolution in Trinidadian guppies (Poecilia reticulata). Evolution 36:160–177CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Rodriguez RL, Sullivan LE, Cocroft RB (2004) Vibrational communication and reproductive isolation in the Enchenopa binotata species complex of treehoppers (Hemiptera : Membracidae). Evolution 58:571–578PubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Ruxton GD, Sherratt TN, Speed M (2004) Avoiding attack: the evolutionary ecology of crypsis, warning signals and mimicry. Oxford University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  38. Ruxton GD, Speed MP, Broom M (2009) Identifying the ecological conditions that select for intermediate levels of aposematic signalling. Evol Ecol 23:491–501CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Sih A (1980) Optimal behavior: can foragers balance two conflicting demands? Science 210:1041–1043PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Simons AM (2011) Modes of response to environmental change and the elusive empirical evidence for bet hedging. In: Proceedings of the Royal Society B-Biological Sciences, London, vol 278, pp 1601–1609Google Scholar
  41. Svensson GP, Lofstedt C, Skals N (2004) The odour makes the difference: male moths attracted by sex pheromones ignore the threat by predatory bats. Oikos 104:91–97CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Turner FT, Pitcher TJ (1986) Attack abatement: A model for group protection by combined avoidance and dilution. Am Nat 128:228–240CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Ecology and Evolutionary BiologyCornell UniversityIthacaUSA

Personalised recommendations