Advertisement

Information Systems and Business & Information Systems Engineering: Status Quo and Outlook

  • Hans Ulrich Buhl
  • Martin Lehnert
Part of the Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing book series (LNBIP, volume 117)

Abstract

Although both communities share a common object of research, the Business and Information Systems Engineering (BISE) community from the German-speaking countries and the Information Systems (IS) community centered in North America have developed quite differently. The BISE community features promote connections with industry, attractive topics to students and practical relevance of publications. But due to various reasons numerous BISE researchers struggle with publications in top-ranked journals. While this weakness obviously is a strength of the IS community, we observe that the IS community struggles with its industry connections and enrollment numbers. What the global IS/BISE community needs is a more intense discourse that increases mutual understanding, creates awareness for the need for complementation, and ensures that the opportunity for complementation is seized. This paper offers insights on how by complementation both communities could mitigate some of their weaknesses and the global IS/BISE community could increase its success as a whole.

Keywords

Information Systems Business and Information Systems Engineering BISE Critical Reflection Scenario Analysis 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Frank, U., Schauer, C., Wigand, R.T.: Different Paths of Development of Two Information Systems Communities: A Comparative Study Based on Peer Interviews. Communications of the Association for Information Systems 22(1), 391–412 (2008)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Junglas, I., Niehaves, B., Spiekermann, S., Stahl, B., Weitzel, T., Winter, R., Baskerville, R.: The inflation of academic intellectual capital: the case for design science research in Europe. European Journal of Information Systems 20(1), 1–6 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Loos, P., König, W., Österle, H., De Marco, M., Pastor, J.A., Rowe, F.: National Research and International Competitiveness–An Antinomy? Business & Information Systems Engineering 2(4), 249–258 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Winter, R.: Design science research in Europe. European Journal of Information Systems 17(5), 470–475 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Buhl, H.U., Fridgen, G., Müller, G., Röglinger, M.: Business and Information Systems Engineering: A Complementary Approach to Information Systems - What We Can Learn from the Past and May Conclude from Present Reflection on the Future. Journal of the Association for Information Systems (2012)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Buhl, H.U., Fridgen, G., König, W., Röglinger, M., Wagner, C.: Where’s the Competitive Advantage in Strategic Information Systems Research? – Making the Case for Boundary-spanning Research Based on the German Business and Information Systems Engineering Tradition. Journal of Strategic Information Systems (2012)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Baskerville, R., Lyytinen, K., Sambamurthy, V., Straub, D.: A response to the design-oriented information systems research memorandum. European Journal of Information Systems 20(1), 11–15 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Gill, G., Bhattacherjee, A.: Whom are we informing? Issues and recommendations for MIS research from an informing sciences perspective. Management Information Systems Quarterly 33(2), 217–235 (2009)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Lyytinen, K., Baskerville, R., Iivari, J., Te’eni, D.: Why the old world cannot publish? Overcoming challenges in publishing high-impact IS research. European Journal of Information Systems 16(4), 317–326 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Hasenkamp, U., Stahlknecht, P.: Wirtschaftsinformatik - Evolution of the Discipline as Reflected by its Journal. Business & Information Systems Engineering 1(1), 14–24 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Gregor, S.: The Nature of Theory in Information Systems. MIS Quarterly 30(3), 611–642 (2006)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Lee, A.: Retrospect and prospect: information systems research in the last and next 25 years. Journal of Information Technology 25(4), 336–348 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Mertens, P.: Die Zielfunktion des Universitätslehrers der Wirtschaftsinformatik - Setzen wir falsche Anreize? In: Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Business and Information Systems Engineering, vol. 2, pp. 1167–1175 (February 2011)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Agarwal, R., Lucas, H.: The Information Systems Identity Crisis: Focusing on High-Visibility and High-Impact Research. MIS Quarterly 29(3), 381–398 (2005)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Winter, R.: Interview with Alan R. Hevner on “Design Science”. Business & Information Systems Engineering 1(1), 126–129 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Hirschheim, R., Klein, H.: Crisis in the IS Field? A Critical Reflection on the State of the Discipline. Journal of the Association for Information Systems 4(10), 237–293 (2003)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Winter, R.: Interview with Jay F. Nunamaker, Jr. on Toward a Broader Vision of IS Research. Business & Information Systems Engineering 2(5), 321–329 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Firth, D., Lawrence, C., Looney, C.A.: Addressing the IS Enrollment Crisis: A 12-step Program to Bring about Change through the Introductory IS Course. Communications of the Association for Information Systems 23(1), 2–36 (2008)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Hirschheim, R., Newman, M.: Houston, we’ve had a problem...offshoring, IS employment and the IS discipline: perception is not reality. Journal of Information Technology 25(4), 358–372 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Navarro, P.: The MBA core curricula of top-ranked U.S. business schools: a study in failure. The Academy of Management Learning and Education 7(1), 108–123 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Sabherwal, R.: Declining IS enrollments: a broader view of causes and strategies – a response to ‘Houston, we’ve had a problem ... offshoring, IS employment and the IS discipline: perception is not reality’. JIT 25(4), 382–384 (2010)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Gill, G., Bhattacherjee, A.: Fashion Waves versus Informing? Response to Baskerville and Myers. MIS Quarterly 33(4), 667–671 (2009)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    King, J.L., Myers, M.D., Rivard, S., Saunders, C., Weber, R.: What Do We Like About the IS Field? Communications of the AIS 26(1), 441–450 (2010)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Klein, H., Rowe, F.: Marshaling the professional experience of doctoral student: A contribution to the practical relevance debate. MIS Quarterly 32(4), 675–686 (2008)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Myers, M.D., Baskerville, R.L.: Commentary on Gill and Bhattacherjee: Is There an Informing Crisis? MIS Quarterly 33(4), 663–665 (2009)Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Somers, M.: Using the theory of the professions to understand the IS identity crisis. European Journal of Information Systems (19), 382–288 (2010)Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Taylor, H., Dillon, S., van Wingen, M.: Focus and Diversity in Information Systems Research: Meeting the dual demand of a healthy applied discipline. MIS Quarterly 34(4), 647–667 (2010)Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Ghoshal, S.: Bad management theories are destroying good management practices. Academy of Management Learning & Education 4(1), 75–91 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Kagermann, H.: Innovation und Nutzen durch Offenheit. Schmalenbachs Zeitschrift für betriebswirtschaftliche Forschung 62, 673–674 (2010)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Hans Ulrich Buhl
    • 1
  • Martin Lehnert
    • 1
  1. 1.Research Center Finance & Information ManagementUniversity of AugsburgAugsburgGermany

Personalised recommendations