Cross-Disciplinary Lessons for the Future Internet

  • Anne-Marie Oostveen
  • Isis Hjorth
  • Brian Pickering
  • Michael Boniface
  • Eric T. Meyer
  • Cristobal Cobo
  • Ralph Schroeder
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 7281)

Abstract

There are many societal concerns that emerge as a consequence of Future Internet (FI) research and development. A survey identified six key social and economic issues deemed most relevant to European FI projects. During a SESERV-organized workshop, experts in Future Internet technology engaged with social scientists (including economists), policy experts and other stakeholders in analyzing the socio-economic barriers and challenges that affect the Future Internet, and conversely, how the Future Internet will affect society, government, and business. The workshop aimed to bridge the gap between thosewho study andthose who build the Internet. This chapter describes the socio-economic barriers seen by the community itself related to the Future Internet and suggests their resolution, as well as investigating how relevant the EU Digital Agenda is to Future Internet technologists.

Keywords

Future Internet Socio-Economics Digital Agenda Users SESERV 

References

  1. 1.
    Mandelson, P., Bradshaw, B.: Digital Britain: Final Report. Department for Business Innovation & Skills and Department for Culture, Media and Sport (2009), http://www.official-documents.gov.uk/document/cm76/7650/7650.pdf
  2. 2.
    European Commission: A Digital Agenda for Europe. European Commission (2010), http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=COM:2010:0245:REV1:EN:HTML
  3. 3.
    The Internet Society: How is the Internet evolving? (2011), http://www.internetsociety.org/internet/how-it's-evolving/future-scenarios
  4. 4.
    SESERV: The Future Internet Debate: Will the Design of the Future Internet be Driven by Technology or Societal Concerns? (2011), http://www.seserv.org/panel/conferences-webcasts#debate
  5. 5.
    Callon, M.: Society in the Making: The Study of Technology as a Tool for Social Analysis. In: Bijker, W.E., Hughes, T.P., Pinch, T. (eds.) The Social Construction of Technological Systems, pp. 83–103. The MIT Press, Cambridge (1987)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Hausheer, D., et al.: Future Internet Socio-Economics – Challenges and Perspectives (2009), http://www.future-internet.eu/fileadmin/documents/madrid_documents/FISE/FISE_position_paper_final.pdf
  7. 7.
    The Internet Society: The Internet Ecosystem (2010), http://www.isoc.org/pubpolpillar/docs/internetmodel.pdf
  8. 8.
    Boniface, M., et al.: First Report on Economic Future Internet Coordination Activities. SESERV Deliverable D2.1, Socio-Economic Services for European Research Projects FP7-2010-ICT-258138-CSA (2011)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Universitat Siegen: Final Report on the Social Impact of ICTs in Europe to the European Commission, SMART No2007/0068. European Commission (2010), http://ec.europa.eu/information_society/eeurope/i2010/docs/eda/social_impact_of_ict.pdf
  10. 10.
    Blackman, C., et al.: Towards a Future Internet: Interrelation between Technological, Social and Economic Trends. European Commission (2010), http://www.internetfutures.eu/wp-content/uploads/2010/11/TAFI-Final-Report.pdf
  11. 11.
    Boniface, M., et al.: Initial SESERV Survey Results, Challenge 1 Projects: Socio-Economic Priorities. SESERV (2011), http://www.seserv.org/fise-conversation/socio-economicpriorities/SESERV-Survey-Results_May11.pdf
  12. 12.
    Oostveen, A., et al.: First Year Report on Scientific Workshop. SESERV Deliverable D1.2, Socio-Economic Services for European Research Projects FP7-2010-ICT-258138-CSA (2011), http://www.social-informatics.net/SESERV_D1.2.pdf
  13. 13.
    Pötzsch, S.: Privacy Awareness: A Means to Solve the Privacy Paradox? In: Matyáš, V., Fischer-Hübner, S., Cvrček, D., Švenda, P. (eds.) The Future of Identity. IFIP AICT, vol. 298, pp. 226–236. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Jones, S.R., McEwen, M.K.: A conceptual model of multiple dimensions of identity. J. Coll. Student Dev. 41, 405–414 (2000)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Harris, E.: Smart wheelie bins to charge for waste. The London Evening Standard, London (2007) Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Nielsen: State of the Media: The Social Media Report Q3 2011 (2011), http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/social/
  17. 17.
    Radwanik, S., et al.: It’s a Social World: Top 10 Need-to-Knows About Social Networking and Where It’s Headed (2011), http://www.comscore.com/Press_Events/Presentations_Whitepapers/2011/it_is_a_social_world_top_10_need-to-knows_about_social_networking
  18. 18.
    European Commission: Europe 2020: A strategy for smart, sustainable and inclusive growth. European Commission (2010), http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=COM:2010:2020:FIN:EN:PDF

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Anne-Marie Oostveen
    • 1
  • Isis Hjorth
    • 1
  • Brian Pickering
    • 2
  • Michael Boniface
    • 2
  • Eric T. Meyer
    • 1
  • Cristobal Cobo
    • 1
  • Ralph Schroeder
    • 1
  1. 1.Oxford Internet InstituteUniversity of OxfordUnited Kingdom
  2. 2.IT InnovationUniversity of SouthamptonUnited Kingdom

Personalised recommendations