Social Interaction in a Cooperative Brain-Computer Interface Game
Does using a BCI influence the social interaction between people when playing a cooperative game? By measuring the amount of speech, utterances, instrumental gestures and empathic gestures during a cooperative game where two participants had to reach a certain goal, and questioning participants about their own experience afterwards this study attempts to provide answers to this question. The results showed that social interaction changed when using a BCI compared to using a mouse. There was a higher amount of utterances and empathic gestures. This indicates that the participants reacted more to the higher difficulty of the BCI selection method. Participants also reported that they felt they cooperated better during the use of the mouse.
Keywordsbrain-computer interfaces social interaction games cooperation
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 7.Lindley, S.E., Le Couteur, J., Berthouze, N.L.: Stirring up experience through movement in game play: effects on engagement and social behaviour. In: CHI 2008: Proceeding of the Twenty-Sixth Annual SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 511–514. ACM, New York (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 9.Lord, C., Risi, S., Lambrecht, L., Cook, E.H., Leventhal, B.L., DiLavore, P.C., Pickles, A., Rutter, M.: The autism diagnostic observation schedule-generic: A standard measure of social and communication deficits associated with the spectrum of autism. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders 30(3), 205–223 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 12.Rebsamen, B., Burdet, E., Guan, C., Zhang, H., Teo, C.L., Zeng, Q., Ang, M., Laugier, C.: A brain-controlled wheelchair based on P300 and path guidance. In: The First IEEE/RAS-EMBS International Conference on Biomedical Robotics and Biomechatronics, pp. 1101–1106. IEEE, Piscataway (2006)Google Scholar
- 13.Reilly, E.L.: EEG recording and operation of apparatus. In: Electroencephalography: Basic Principles, Clinical Applications and Related Fields, pp. 122–142. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Baltimore (1999)Google Scholar
- 14.Ruen Shan, L., Ibrahim, F., Moghavvemi, M.: Assessment of steady-state visual evoked potential for brain computer communication. In: 3rd Kuala Lumpur International Conference on Biomedical Engineering, pp. 352–354. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)Google Scholar