The SMILE Model: Construction and Calibration

  • Cathal O’Donoghue
  • Niall Farell
  • Karyn Morrissey
  • John Lennon
  • Dimitris Ballas
  • Graham Clarke
  • Stephen Hynes
Chapter
Part of the Advances in Spatial Science book series (ADVSPATIAL)

Abstract

In the previous chapter we reviewed the use of spatial microsimulation models for policy analysis and reviewed the type of applications for which the methodology has been employed. In the absence of spatially representative micro-data in Ireland, we require a technique for generating this data and hence the microsimulation model. In this chapter we describe a number of methodologies for doing this and evaluate the performance of methods chosen for our ‘Simulation Model of the Irish Local Economy’ (SMILE). To recap, the primary focus of the SMILE framework is to assess the socio-economic impacts of policy or economic changes. The motivation for the model is to assess the impact of these changes in the context of agricultural, rural and environmental policy in addition to the more standard analysis of economic and social policy change.

Keywords

Constraint Variable Quota Sampling Microsimulation Model Electoral District Household Budget Survey 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Anselin L (1995) Local indicators of spatial association – LISA. Geogr Anal 27(2):93–115CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ballas D, Clarke GP (2000) GIS and microsimulation for local labour market policy analysis. Computers Environ Urban Syst 24:305–330Google Scholar
  3. Ballas D, Clarke GP, Turton I (2003) A spatial microsimulation model for social policy evaluation. In: Boots B, Thomas R (eds) Modelling geographical systems. Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp 143–168Google Scholar
  4. Ballas D, Rossiter D, Thomas B, Clarke G, Dorling D (2005a) Geography matters: simulating the local impacts of national social policies. Joseph Rowntree Foundation, York, Joseph Rowntree Foundation contemporary research issuesGoogle Scholar
  5. Ballas D, Clarke GP, Dorling D, Eyre H, Rossiter D, Thomas B (2005b) SimBritain: a spatial microsimulation approach to population dynamics. Popul Space Place 11:13–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Ballas D, Clarke GP, Dorling D, Rossiter D (2007) Using Simbritain to model the geographical impact of national government policies. Geogr Anal 39(1):44–77CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Birkin M (1987) Iterative proportional fitting (IPF): theory, method, and example. Computer manual, 26. School of Geography, University of Leeds, LeedsGoogle Scholar
  8. Birkin M, Clarke M (1985) Comprehensive dynamic urban models: integrating macro- and microapproaches. In: Griffith DA, Haining RP (eds) Transformations through space and time: an analysis of nonlinear structures, bifurcation points and autoregressive dependencies. Martinus Nijhoff, Dordrecht, p-165Google Scholar
  9. Birkin M, Clarke M (1988) SYNTHESIS – a synthetic spatial information system for urban and regional analysis: methods and examples. Environ Plann A 20:1645–1671CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Birkin M, Clarke M (1989) The generation of individual and household incomes at the small area level using synthesis. Reg Stud 23:535–548CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Birkin M, Clarke GP (2011) Enhancing spatial microsimulation using geodemographics. Ann Reg Sci, forthcoming 49(2) pp 515–532Google Scholar
  12. Caldwell SB (1996) Health, Wealth, Pensions and Life Paths: The CORSIM Dynamic Microsimulation Model. In: Harding A (ed.) Microsimulation and Public Policy, Elsevier, AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
  13. Chin S-F, Harding A (2006) Regional dimensions: creating synthetic small-area microdata and spatial microsimulation models. Technical paper no. 33. National Centre for Social and Economic Modelling, CanberraGoogle Scholar
  14. Clarke GP (1996) Microsimulation for urban and regional policy analysis. Pion, LondonGoogle Scholar
  15. Dowsland K (1993) Simulated annealing. In: Reeves C (ed) Modern heuristic techniques for combinatorial problems. Blackwell, Oxford, pp 20–69Google Scholar
  16. Edwards KL, Clarke GP (2009) The design and validation of a spatial microsimulation model of obesogenic environments for children in Leeds: SimObesity. Soc Sci Med 69(7):1127–1134CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Edwards KL, Clarke GP, Ransley JK, Cade J (2010) The neighbourhood matters: studying exposures relevant to childhood obesity and the policy implications in Leeds, UK. J Epidemiol Community Health 64:194–201CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Farrell N, O’Donoghue C, Morrissey K (2010) Spatial microsimulation using quota sampling. Teagasc rural economy research series working paper 7Google Scholar
  19. Fienberg SE (1970) An iterative procedure for estimation in contingency tables. Ann Math Stat 41:907–917CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Fischer MM, Nijkamp P (1992) Geographic information systems and spatial analysis. Ann Regional Sci 26(1):3–17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Huang Z, Williamson P (2001) A comparison of synthetic reconstruction and combinatorial optimisation approaches to the creation of small-area microdata. Department of Geography working paper 2001/2, University of LiverpoolGoogle Scholar
  22. Kirkpatrick S, Gelatt CD Jr, Vecchi MP (1983) Optimization by simulated annealing. Science 220:671–680CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Metropolis N, Rosenbluth AW, Rosenbluth MN, Teller AH, Teller E (1953) Equation of state calculations by fast computing machines. J Chem Phys 21:1087–1092CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Nolan B, Whelan CT, Willams J (1998) Where are the poor households? The spatial distribution of poverty and deprivation in Ireland. Combat Poverty Agency, DublinGoogle Scholar
  25. Norman P (1999) Putting iterative proportional fitting on the researcher’s. Working paper 99/03, Desk School of Geography University of LeedsGoogle Scholar
  26. Oketch T, Carrick M (2005) Calibration and validation of a micro-simulation model in network analysis, TRB annual meeting, Washington DCGoogle Scholar
  27. Openshaw S, Rao L (1995) Algorithms for reengineering 1991 census geography. Environ Plann A 27:425–446CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Pratschke J, Haase T (2007) Measurement of social disadvantage and its spatial articulation in the Republic of Ireland. Reg Stud 41(6):719–734CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Rephann TJ, Makila K, Holm E (2005) Microsimulation for local impact analysis: an application to plant shutdown. J Reg Sci 45(1):183–222CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Smith DM, Clarke GP, Harland K (2009) Improving the synthetic data generation process in spatial microsimulation models. Environ Plann A 41(5):1251–1268CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Smith DM, Pearce JR, Harland K (2011) Can a deterministic spatial microsimulation model provide reliable small-area estimates of health behaviours? An example of smoking prevalence in New Zealand. Health Place 17:618–624CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Tomintz M, Garcia-Barrios VM, Gruber G (2011) How small area estimates can support policy planning – a case study for antenatal classes proceedings. In: Angewandte Geoinformatik, SalzburgGoogle Scholar
  33. van Laarhoven P, Aarts E (1987) Simulating annealing: theory and applications. Kluwer Academic, LondonGoogle Scholar
  34. Voas DW, Williamson P (2000) An evaluation of the combinatorial optimisation approach to the creation of synthetic microdata. Int J Popul Geogr 6:349–366CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Watson D, Whelan CT, Willams J, Blackwell S (2005) Mapping poverty: national regional and county patterns, Combat poverty agency research series no. 34. Combat Poverty Agency, DublinGoogle Scholar
  36. Williamson P (2009) Creating synthetic sub-regional baseline populations. Paper presented to ESRC microsimulation series, London, 9 Apr 2009Google Scholar
  37. Williamson P, Birkin M, Rees P (1998) The estimation of population microdata by using data from small area statistics and samples of anonymised records. Environ Plann A 30:785–816CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Wong DWS (1992) The reliability of using the iterative proportional fitting procedure. Prof Geogr 44:340–348CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Cathal O’Donoghue
    • 1
  • Niall Farell
    • 2
  • Karyn Morrissey
    • 3
  • John Lennon
    • 1
  • Dimitris Ballas
    • 4
  • Graham Clarke
    • 5
  • Stephen Hynes
    • 2
  1. 1.Rural Economy and Development ProgrammeTeagascAthenryIreland
  2. 2.Socio-Economic Marine Research UnitNational University of IrelandGalway Co. GalwayIreland
  3. 3.School of Environmental SciencesUniversity of LiverpoolLiverpoolUK
  4. 4.Department of GeographyUniversity of SheffieldSheffieldUK
  5. 5.School of GeographyUniversity of LeedsLeedsUK

Personalised recommendations