Introduction

  • Dimitris Ballas
  • Graham Clarke
  • Stephen Hynes
  • Karyn Morrissey
  • Cathal O’Donoghue
Chapter
Part of the Advances in Spatial Science book series (ADVSPATIAL)

Abstract

Rural areas across the world face many unique problems and challenges. Such communities have had an economy based historically on farming, forestry or mineral abstraction. Rural incomes and livelihoods have therefore been linked directly to the fortunes of these primary production sectors, with farming being the most common occupation in many rural areas. In Europe, rural incomes have been boosted, or at least secured, by very favourable policies relating to agricultural subsidies in particular. Farmers have been rewarded for (in effect) over producing, often resulting in wastage on a vast scale (butter mountains; wine lakes etc.). In the wake of the clearly unsustainable nature of such production systems these policies are changing and farmers are likely to get subsidies in the future for the non-production related goods associated with agriculture such as taking care of the rural landscape, the protection of biodiversity and sensitive habitats and allowing public access for recreational pursuits. The implication for farm incomes and for rural life in general is immense.

Keywords

Rural Development Common Agricultural Policy Microsimulation Model Rural Income Rural Development Policy 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Ballas D, Clarke GP (1999) Regional versus local multipliers of economic change? A microsimulation approach. Paper presented at the 39th European Regional Science Association Congress, University College Dublin, Dublin, 23–27 Aug 1999Google Scholar
  2. Ballas D, Clarke GP (2000) GIS and microsimulation for local labour market policy analysis. Computers Environ Urban Syst 24:305–330CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Ballas D, Clarke GP (2001) Towards local implications of major job transformations in the city: a spatial microsimulation approach. Geogr Anal 33:291–311CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Ballas D, Clarke GP (2001a) Towards local implications of major job transformations in the city: a spatial microsimulation approach. Geogr Anal 33:291–311CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Ballas D, Clarke GP (2001b) Modelling the local impacts of national social policies: a spatial microsimulation approach. Environ Plann C Gov Policy 19:587–606CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Ballas D, Clarke GP (2009) Spatial microsimulation. In Fotheringham AS, Rogerson PA (eds) Handbook of spatial analysis. Sage, London, pp 277–298Google Scholar
  7. Ballas D, Clarke GP, Commins P (2001) Building a spatial microsimulation model for the Irish rural economy. Paper presented at the 12th theoretical and quantitative geography European colloquium, Rouen, 7–11 Sept 2001Google Scholar
  8. Ballas D, Clarke GP, Wiemers E (2005) Building a dynamic spatial microsimulation model for Ireland. Popul Space Place 11:157–172CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Ballas D, Clarke GP, Wiemers E (2006) Spatial microsimulation for rural policy analysis in Ireland: the implications of CAP reforms for the national spatial strategy. J Rural Stud 22:367–378CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Birkin M, Clarke M (1988) SYNTHESIS – a synthetic spatial information system for urban and regional analysis: methods and examples. Environ Plann A 20:1645–1671CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Birkin M, Clarke M (1989) The generation of individual and household incomes at the small area level. Reg Stud 23:535–548CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Birkin M, Clarke GP, Clarke M (1996) Urban and regional modelling at the microscale. In: Clarke GP (ed) Microsimulation for Urban and regional policy analysis. Pion, London, pp 10–27Google Scholar
  13. Callan T (1991) Income tax and welfare reforms: microsimulation modelling and analysis, vol 154, Central research series paper. ESRI, DublinGoogle Scholar
  14. Callan T, Sutherland H (1997) The impact of comparable policies in European countries: microsimulation approaches. Eur Econ Rev 41:627–633CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. CEC (Commission of the European Communities) (1988) The future of rural society, Supplement 4/88, Bulletin of the European Commission, LuxembourgGoogle Scholar
  16. Clarke GP (1996) Microsimulation for urban and regional policy analysis. Pion, LondonGoogle Scholar
  17. Commins P (1995) Rural development in Ireland: the case for an area-based approach. In: Proceedings of agricultural economics society of Ireland 1994/95, Dublin, pp 138–160Google Scholar
  18. Commins P, Keane M (1994) Developing the rural economy: problems, programmes and prospects. In: National Economic and Social Council (ed) New approaches to rural development, part II. NESC, DublinGoogle Scholar
  19. Department of Agriculture, Food and the Marine (1999) Ensuring the Future- A Strategy for Rural Development in Ireland. White Paper on Rural Development, available from: http://www.agriculture.gov.ie/publications/1996-1999/whitepaperonruraldevelopment/. Accessed 20 July 2011Google Scholar
  20. Fitz Gerald J, Kearney J, Morgenroth E, Smyth D (1999) National investment priorities for the period 2000–2006. ESRI, DublinGoogle Scholar
  21. Harding A (ed) (1996) Microsimulation and public policy, North Holland, Contributions to Economic Analysis 232, AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
  22. Meredith D (2007) Rural areas in transition: evidence of rural restructuring in the republic of Ireland. Teagasc rural economy research working paper series, 07-RE-WP-15Google Scholar
  23. Mitton L, Sutherland H, Weeks M (eds) (2000) Microsimulation modelling for policy analysis: challenges and innovations. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  24. Morrissey K, O’Donoghue C (2011) The spatial distribution of labour force participation and market earnings at the sub-national level in Ireland. Rev Econ Anal 3(1):80–101Google Scholar
  25. National Development Plan (2000) Stationery office, DublinGoogle Scholar
  26. Orcutt GH (1957) A new type of socio-economic system. Rev Econ Stat 39:116–123CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Ray C (1998) Culture, intellectual property and territorial rural development. Sociol Ruralis 15(3):257–267Google Scholar
  28. Redmond G, Sutherland H, Wilson M (1998) The arithmetic of tax and social security reform: a user’s guide to microsimulation methods and analysis. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  29. Shrestha S, Hennessy T, Hynes S (2007) The effect of decoupling on farming in Ireland: a regional analysis. Ir J Agric Food Res 46:1–13Google Scholar
  30. The European Commission (1996) The Cork Declaration - a Living Countryside, Cork, European Conference on Rural Development, 7–9 November 1996, available online from: http://europa.eu.int/comm/agriculture/rur/cork_en.htm. Accessed 28 August 2001

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Dimitris Ballas
    • 1
  • Graham Clarke
    • 2
  • Stephen Hynes
    • 3
  • Karyn Morrissey
    • 4
  • Cathal O’Donoghue
    • 5
  1. 1.Department of GeographyUniversity of SheffieldSheffieldUK
  2. 2.School of GeographyUniversity of LeedsLeedsUK
  3. 3.Socio-Economic Marine Research UnitNational University of IrelandGalway Co. GalwayIreland
  4. 4.School of Environmental SciencesUniversity of LiverpoolLiverpoolUK
  5. 5.Rural Economy and Development ProgrammeTeagascAthenryIreland

Personalised recommendations