Can Pictures Be a Candidate for Knowledge Media?

Part of the Smart Innovation, Systems and Technologies book series (SIST, volume 14)

Abstract

Can pictures be a candidate for knowledge media? After mentioning the background of this question in chapter one, we introduce in chapter two the idea of three kinds of knowledge, from discussion of a picture from a book of Dominic McIver Lopes (Lopes 2006) —that is, knowledge about, knowledge through and knowledge in—and point out its deficiencies. In chapter three, we then propose an alternative idea of pictures from which we obtain knowledge —that is, pictures as objects and facts, pictures as process and pictures as informational indicators—and find strong support for our proposal from various research fields and practices. Finally we conclude that we could think of pictures as a candidate for knowledge media.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Ars Electronica Linz GmbH, Repair: sind wir noch zu retten, Linz (2010)Google Scholar
  2. Currie, G.: Art works as action types. In: Lamarque & Olsen (2004), pp. 103–122 (1989)Google Scholar
  3. Evans, G.: The varieties of reference. In: MacDowell, J. (ed.) Oxford (1982)Google Scholar
  4. Fujihata, M.: What is drawing process studies? In: Drawing Process Studies. Department of Engineering, University of Tokyo (2008) (in Japanese)Google Scholar
  5. Goel, V.: Sketches of thought. The MIT Press (1995)Google Scholar
  6. Ishibashi, K., Okada, T.: Copying artworks as perceptual experience for creation. Cognitive Studies 11(1), 51–59 (2004) (in Japanese)Google Scholar
  7. Ishibashi, K., Okada, T.: Facilitating creative drawings by copying art works by others. Cognitive Studies 17(1), 196–223 (2010) (in Japanese)Google Scholar
  8. Iwasaki, H.: Biomedia Art: possibilities of synthetic biology from the point of aesthetics. Science Journal KAGAKU, 747–753 (July 2010) (in Japanese)Google Scholar
  9. Katz, M.S.: Reconsidering images: using the farm security ad-ministration photographs as objects in history exhibitions. In: Dudley, S., et al. (eds.) The Thing About Museums: Objects and Experience, Representation and Contestation, Essays in Honour of Professor Susan M. Pearce, pp. 324–337, Routledge (2012)Google Scholar
  10. Lamarque, P., Olsen, S.H.: Aesthetics and the philosophy of art. Blackwell (2004)Google Scholar
  11. Lopes, D.M.: Understanding pictures. Oxford (1996)Google Scholar
  12. Lopes, D.M.: Sight and sensibility: evaluating pictures. Oxford (2006)Google Scholar
  13. Erwin, P.: Zum Problem der Beschreibung und Inhaltsdeutung von Werken der bildenden Kunst. In: Kraemmerling, E. (ed.) Ikonographie und Ikonologie: Theorien-Entwicklung-Probleme, Dumont (1932)Google Scholar
  14. Pelowski, M., Akiba, F.: A model of art perception, evaluation and emotion in transformative aesthetic experience. New Ideas in Psychology 29(2), 80–97 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Schere, K.R.: Gefrorene Gefuehle: Zur Emotionsdarstellung in der bildenden Kunst. In: Boehm, G., et al. (eds.) Movens Bild: Zwischen Evidenz und Affekt, pp. 249–273. Wilhelm Fink (2008)Google Scholar
  16. Stolnitz, J.: On the cognitive triviality of art, Lamar-que & Olsen, pp. 337–343. Blackwell (1992); (Reprinted in (2004))Google Scholar
  17. Yokochi, S., Okada, T.: Creative expertise of contemporary artists. Cognitive Studies 14(3), 437–454 (2007) (in Japanese) Google Scholar
  18. Zeimbekis, J.: Pictures and Singular Thought. Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 68(1), 11–22 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Zeki, S.: Inner vision: an exploration of art and the brain. Oxford (1999)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Graduate School of Information ScienceNagoya UniversityNagoyaJapan

Personalised recommendations