Not by Luck Alone: The Importance of Chance-Seeking and Silent Knowledge in Abductive Cognition

  • Emanuele Bardone
Part of the Studies in Applied Philosophy, Epistemology and Rational Ethics book series (SAPERE, volume 2)

Abstract

In this paper I will focus on luck in abductive cognition and its relationship with chance-seeking and silent knowledge. By definition luck can be neither predicted nor planned, but I will try to show how it can be actively sought by seeking those chances maximizing abducibility, which will be described as the opportunity of being afforded by lucky events. I will root this ability of seeking chances in evolution, more precisely, in the ability – not entirely unique to our species - of creating powerful cognitive niches, whose construction and modification lead to humans to self-domestication and, in so doing, to introduction of a sense of purposefulness in evolution. Finally, I will introduce the notion of silent knowledge thatwill be defined as the form of knowledge that emerges along with chance-seeking activities.

Keywords

Niche Construction Epistemic Luck Inheritance System Correct Hypothesis Cognitive Niche 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Abe, A.: Cognitive Chance Discovery. In: Stephanidis, C. (ed.) UAHCI 2009, Part I, HCII 2009. LNCS, vol. 5614, pp. 315–323. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bardone, E.: Seeking Chances. From Biased Rationality to Distributed Cognition. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bardone, E.: Unintended affordances as violent mediators. maladaptive affects of technologically enriched cognitive niches. International Journal of Technoethics 2(4), 37–52 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bertolotti, T., Magnani, L.: The Role of Agency Detection in the Invention of Supernatural Beings. In: Magnani, L., Carnielli, W., Pizzi, C. (eds.) Model-Based Reasoning in Science and Technology. SCI, vol. 314, pp. 239–262. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Boyer, P.: Religious thought and behaviour as by-products of brain function. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 7(3), 119–124 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Clark, A.: Where brain, body, and world collide. Journal of Cognitive Systems Research 1, 5–17 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Danto, A.N.: Narrative sentences. History and Theory 2(2), 146–179 (1962)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Darwin, C.: The Origin of Species: By Means of Natural Selection, Or the Preservation of Favoured Races in the Struggle for Life. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Dawkins, R.: The God Delusion. Bantam Press, London (2006)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Day, R.L., Laland, K., Odling-Smee, J.: Rethinking adaptation. The niche-construction perspective. Perspectives in Biology and Medicine 46(1), 80–95 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Dennett, D.: The Darwin’s Dangerous Idea. Simon & Schuster, New York (1996)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Elliot, J.: The Steve Jobs Way: iLeadership for a New Generation. Vanguard Press, New York (2011)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Gibson, J.J.: The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception. Houghton Mifflin, Boston (1979)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Godfrey-Smith, P.: Complexity and the Function of Mind in Nature. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1998)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Godrey-Smith, P.: Environmental complexity and the evolution of cognition. In: Sternberg, R., Kaufman, K. (eds.) The Evolution of Intelligence, pp. 233–249. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah (2002)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Hintikka, J.: Socratic Epistemology: Explorations of Knowledge-Seeking by Questioning. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1993)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Jablonka, E., Lamb, M.J.: Evolution in Four Dimensions. Genetic, Epigenetic, Behavioral, and Symbolic Variation in the History of Life. The MIT Press, Cambridge (2005)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Kawasaki, G.: Enchantment: The Art of Changing Hearts, Minds, and Actions. Penguin & Portfolio, New York (2011)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Laland, K., Brown, G.: Niche construction, human behavior, and the adaptive-lag hypothesis. Evolutionary Anthropology 15, 95–104 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Laland, K.N., Odling-Smee, J., Feldman, M.W.: Niche construction, biological evolution and cultural change. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23(1), 131–175 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Laurent, E., Ripoll, H.: Extending the rather unnoticed gibsonian view that? perception is cognitive?: Development of the enactive approach to perceptual-cognitive expertise. In: Araujo, D., Ripoll, H., Raab, M. (eds.) Perspectives on Cognition and Action in Sport, pp. 133–146. Nova Publishers, New York (2009)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Magnani, L.: Abduction, Reason, and Science. Processes of Discovery and Explanation. Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers, New York (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Magnani, L.: Abductive Cognition. The Epistemological and Eco-Cognitive Dimensions of Hypothetical Reasoning. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Magnani, L.: Understanding Violence. The Intertwining of Morality, Religion and Violence: A Philosophical Stance. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Magnani, L.: Scientific Models are Not Fictions Model-Based Science as Epistemic Warfare. In: Magnani, L., Li, L. (eds.) Philosophy and Cognitive Science. SAPERE, vol. 2, pp. 1–38. Springer, Heidelberg (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Magnani, L., Bardone, E.: Sharing representations and creating chances through cognitive niche construction. The role of affordances and abduction. In: Iwata, S., Ohsawa, Y., Tsumoto, S., Zhong, N., Shi, Y., Magnani, L. (eds.) Communications and Discoveries from Multidisciplinary Data, pp. 3–40. Springer, Berlin (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Maynard-Smith, J., Szathmry, E.: The Origins of Life: From the Birth of Life to the Origin of Language. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2000)Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    McBurney, P., Parsons, S.: Chance Discovery Using Dialectical Argumentation. In: Terano, T., Nishida, T., Namatame, A., Tsumoto, Y., Ohsawa, S., Washio, T. (eds.) JSAI 2001 Workshops. LNCS(LNAI), vol. 2253, pp. 414–424. Springer, Berlin (2001)Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Odling-Smee, F., Laland, K., Feldman, M.: Niche Construction. A Neglected Process in Evolution. Princeton University Press, New York (2003)Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Ohsawa, Y., McBurney, P. (eds.): Chance Discovery. Springer, Berlin (2003)Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Polanyi, M.: The Tacit Dimension. Routledge & Kegan Paul, London (1966)Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Pritchard, D.: Epistemic luck. Journal of Philosophical Research 29, 193–222 (2004)Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Pyysiainen, I., Hauser, M.: The origins of religion: evolved adaptation or by-product? Trends in Cognitive Sciences 14(3), 104–109 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Reed, E.S.: The intention to use a specific affordance: a framework for psychology. In: Wozniak, R., Fisscher, K.K. (eds.) Development in Context: Acting and Thinking in Specific Environments, pp. 45–75. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale (1993)Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Reed, E.S.: Encountering the World. Erlbaum, New York (1996)Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Simon, H.: Models of Discovery and Other Topics in the Methods of Science. Reidel, Dordrecht (1977)Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Sinha, C.: Epigenetics, semiotics, and the mysteries of the organism. Biological Theory 1(2), 112–115 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Sosis, R.: The adaptationist-byproduct debate on the evolution of religion: Five misunderstandings of the adaptationist program. Journal of Cognition and Culture 9, 315–332 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Taleb, N.: Antifragility. Penguin, London (forthcoming, 2012)Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Thagard, P.: Computational Philosophy of Science. MIT Press, Cambridge (1993)Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Turner, J.S.: Extended phenotypes and extended organisms. Biology and Philosophy 19, 327–352 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Tzu, S.: The Art of War. Fastpencil, London (2010)Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Varela, F., Thompson, E., Rosch, E.: The Embodied Mind: Cognitive Science and Human Experience. MIT Press, Cambridge (1999)Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Withagen, R., de Poela, H.J., Araujob, D., Peppinga, J.J.: Affordances can invite behavior: Reconsidering the relationship between affordances and agency. New Ideas in Psychology 30(2), 250–258 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Withagen, R., van Wermeskerken, M.: The role of affordances in the evolutionary process reconsidered: a niche construction perspective. Theory & Psychology 20, 489–510 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Zhang, J., Patel, V.L.: Distributed cognition, representation, and affordance. Cognition & Pragmatics 14(2), 333–341 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Emanuele Bardone
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Institute of InformaticsTallinn UniversityTallinnEstonia
  2. 2.Department of Arts and Humanities, Philosophy Section and Computational Philosophy LaboratoryUniversity of PaviaPaviaItaly

Personalised recommendations