Study Design and Research Methodology in Sports Medicine

  • Asbjørn Årøen
  • Einar Andreas Sivertsen
  • Britt Elin Øiestad
  • Sverre Løken
  • Lars Petter Granan
Chapter

Abstract

Sports injuries occur often at young ages at all levels of sports activity. These injuries may cause lifelong disability or problems for future sport or work participation. Currently, the treatment of these injuries is of major importance to the individual and to the society both seen from the quality of life perspective but also from the economical point of view. Decisions about treatment must be evidence based. Knowledge about study design and methodology is crucial in order to detect misleading studies or reviews that unfortunately sometimes are published in this field [1]. Knowledge of study designs and the potential weaknesses of study designs are necessary to obtain the best treatment to people with sports injuries. In this chapter, we present knowledge about how to plan, perform, and evaluate studies in sports medicine.

Keywords

Anterior Cruciate Ligament Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injury Sport Injury Anterior Cruciate Ligament Rupture 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. 1.
    Gelberman RH, Samson D, Mirza SK, Callaghan JJ, Pellegrini VD Jr (2010) Orthopaedic surgeons and the medical device industry: the threat to scientific integrity and the public trust. J Bone Joint Surg Am 92(3):765–777PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Serenko A, Dohan M (2011) Comparing the expert survey and citation impact journal ranking methods: example from the field of artificial intelligence. J Informetr 5(4):629–648CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Swiontkowski MF (2003) Why we should collect outcomes data. J Bone Joint Surg Am 85-A(Suppl 1):14–15Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Ytterstad K, Granan LP, Engebretsen L (2011) The Norwegian Cruciate Ligament Registry has a high degree of completeness. Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen 131(3):248–250PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bloom S (2011) Registries in chronic disease: coming your way soon? Registries–problems, solutions and the future. Rheumatology (Oxford) 50(1):4–5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Elwood JM (2007) Critical appraisal of epidemiological studies and clinical trials. Oxford medical publications, 3rd edn. Oxford University Press, Oxford/New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Jakobsen RB, Engebretsen L, Slauterbeck JR (2005) An analysis of the quality of cartilage repair studies. J Bone Joint Surg Am 87(10):2232–2239PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Coleman BD, Khan KM, Maffulli N, Cook JL, Wark JD (2000) Studies of surgical outcome after patellar tendinopathy: clinical significance of methodological deficiencies and guidelines for future studies. Victorian Institute of Sport Tendon Study Group. Scand J Med Sci Sports 10(1):2–11PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Gillquist J, Messner K (1999) Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction and the long-term incidence of gonarthrosis. Sports Med 27(3):143–156PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Oiestad BE, Engebretsen L, Storheim K, Risberg MA (2009) Knee osteoarthritis after anterior cruciate ligament injury: a systematic review. Am J Sports Med 37(7):1434–1443PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Ardern CL, Webster KE, Taylor NF, Feller JA (2011) Return to sport following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis of the state of play. Br J Sports Med 45(7):596–606PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Engen CN, Engebretsen L, Årøen A (2010) Knee cartilage defect patients enrolled in randomized controlled trials are not representative of patients in orthopedic practice. Cartilage 1(4):312–319CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Frobell RB, Roos EM, Roos HP, Ranstam J, Lohmander LS (2010) A randomized trial of treatment for acute anterior cruciate ligament tears. N Engl J Med 363(4):331–342PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Frobell RB, Lohmander LS, Roos EM (2007) The challenge of recruiting patients with anterior cruciate ligament injury of the knee into a randomized clinical trial comparing surgical and non-surgical treatment. Contemp Clin Trials 28(3):295–302PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Ioannidis JP, Evans SJ, Gotzsche PC, O’Neill RT, Altman DG, Schulz K, Moher D (2004) Better reporting of harms in randomized trials: an extension of the CONSORT statement. Ann Intern Med 141(10):781–788PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Hopewell S, Loudon K, Clarke MJ, Oxman AD, Dickersin K (2009) Publication bias in clinical trials due to statistical significance or direction of trial results. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 1:MR000006PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© ESSKA 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Asbjørn Årøen
    • 1
  • Einar Andreas Sivertsen
    • 1
  • Britt Elin Øiestad
    • 2
  • Sverre Løken
    • 3
  • Lars Petter Granan
    • 4
  1. 1.Department of Orthopaedic SurgeryAkershus University Hospital and Oslo Sports Trauma CenterNordbyhagenNorway
  2. 2.Hjelp24 NIMINorwegian Research Center for Active RehabilitationOsloNorway
  3. 3.Department of Orthopaedic SurgeryOslo University Hospital Ullevål and Oslo Sports Trauma CenterNydalen, OsloNorway
  4. 4.Department of Physical Medicine and RehabilitationOslo University Hospital, Norwegian Knee Ligament Registry, Oslo Sports Trauma Research CenterNydalen, OsloNorway

Personalised recommendations