Reactive Event Calculus for Monitoring Global Computing Applications
- 590 Downloads
In 1986 Kowalski and Sergot proposed a logic-based formalism named Event Calculus (EC), for specifying in a declarative manner how the happening of events affects some representation (the state) of the world. Since its introduction, EC has been recognized for being an excellent framework to reason about time and events. Recently, with the advent of complex software systems decomposed into sets of autonomous, heterogeneous distributed entities, EC has drawn attention as a viable solution for monitoring them, where monitoring means to represent their state and how events dynamically affect such state.
In this work we present the fundamentals of a reactive and logic-based version of EC, named REC, for monitoring declarative properties, while maintaining a solid formal background. We present some results about its formal as well as practical aspects, and discuss how REC has been applied to a variety of application domains, namely BPM, SOC, CGs and MAS. We also highlight some key issues required by the monitoring task, and finally discuss how REC overcomes such issues.
KeywordsSergot Event Calculus Monitoring Computational Logic Business Process Management Service Oriented Architectures Multi-Agent Systems Clinical Guidelines
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 4.Bottrighi, A., Chesani, F., Mello, P., Montali, M., Montani, S., Terenziani, P.: Conformance Checking of Executed Clinical Guidelines in Presence of Basic Medical Knowledge. In: Daniel, F., Barkaoui, K., Dustdar, S. (eds.) BPM Workshops 2011, Part II. LNBIP, vol. 100, pp. 200–211. Springer, Heidelberg (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 5.Chesani, F., Mello, P., Montali, M., Torroni, P.: Commitment Tracking via the Reactive Event Calculus. In: Boutilier, C. (ed.) Proc. of the 21st Intl. Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI 2009), pp. 91–96 (2009)Google Scholar
- 6.Chesani, F., Montali, M., Mello, P., Torroni, P.: Monitoring Time-Aware Social Commitments with Reactive Event Calculus. In: Proceedings of the 7th International Symposium From Agent Theory to Agent Implementation, AT2AI (2010)Google Scholar
- 8.Chittaro, L., Montanari, A.: Efficient handling of context-dependency in the cached event calculus. In: Proc. of TIME 1994 - International Workshop on Temporal Representation and Reasoning, pp. 103–112 (1994)Google Scholar
- 16.Mahbub, K., Spanoudakis, G.: Run-Time Monitoring of Requirements for Systems Composed of Web-Services: Initial Implementation and Evaluation Experience. In: Proeedings of the 3rd IEEE International Conference on Web Services (ICWS), pp. 257–265. IEEE Computer Society Press (2005)Google Scholar
- 19.Montali, M.: Specification and Verification of Declarative Open Interaction Models: a Logic-Based Approach. Ph.D. thesis, University of Bologna (2009)Google Scholar
- 21.Montali, M., Maggi, F.M., Chesani, F., Mello, P., van der Aalst, W.M.P.: Monitoring business constraints with the event calculus. Tech. rep., LIA, University of Bologna (2010); currently submitted to ACM TISTGoogle Scholar
- 24.Sadri, F., Kowalski, R.A.: Variants of the Event Calculus. In: Sterling, L. (ed.) Proc. of the 12th International Conference on Logic Programming (ICLP 1995), pp. 67–81. MIT Press (1995)Google Scholar
- 26.Shanahan, M.: Robotics and the common sense informatic situation. In: Wahlster, W. (ed.) Proceedings of the 12th European Conference on Artificial Intelligence (ECAI 1996), pp. 684–688. John Wiley and Sons (1996)Google Scholar
- 29.Singh, M.P.: Social and psychological commitments in multiagent systems. In: AAAI Fall Symposium on Knowledge and Action at Social and Organizational Levels, pp. 104–106. AAAI Inc. (1991)Google Scholar
- 30.Ten Teije, A., Miksch, S., Lucas, P. (eds.): Computer-based Medical Guidelines and Protocols: A Primer and Current Trends. Studies in Health Technology and Informatics, vol. 139. IOS Press (2008)Google Scholar
- 33.Weiss, G. (ed.): Multiagent systems: a modern approach to distributed artificial intelligence. MIT Press, Cambridge (1999)Google Scholar
- 34.Weske, M.: Business Process Management: Concepts, Languages, Architectures. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)Google Scholar