Decapod: A Flexible, Low Cost Digitization Solution for Small and Medium Archives

  • Faisal Shafait
  • Michael Patrick Cutter
  • Joost van Beusekom
  • Syed Saqib Bukhari
  • Thomas M. Breuel
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 7139)

Abstract

Scholarly content needs to be online, and for much mass produced content, that migration has already happened. Unfortunately, the online presence of scholarly content is much more sporadic for long tail material such as small journals, original source materials in the humanities and social sciences, non-journal periodicals, and more. A large barrier to this content being available is the cost and complexity of setting up a digitization project for small and scattered collections coupled with a lack of revenue opportunities to recoup those costs. Collections with limited audiences and hence limited revenue opportunities are nonetheless often of considerable scholarly importance within their domains. The expense and difficulty of digitization presents a significant obstacle to making such paper archives available online. To address this problem, the Decapod project aims at providing a solution that is primarily suitable for small to medium paper archives with material that is rare or unique and is of sufficient interest that it warrants being made more widely available. This paper gives an overview of the project and presents its current status.

Keywords

Document Image Halftone Image Digitization Project Layout Analysis Medium Archive 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    van Beusekom, J., Shafait, F., Breuel, T.M.: Combined orientation and skew detection using geometric text-line modeling. International Journal on Document Analysis and Recognition 13(2), 79–92 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bloomberg, D.S.: Multiresolution morphological approach to document image analysis. In: Proc. Int. Conf. on Document Analysis and Recognition, St. Malo, France, pp. 963–971 (1991)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Breuel, T.M.: The OCRopus open source OCR system. In: Proc. SPIE Document Recognition and Retrieval XV, San Jose, CA, USA, pp. 0F1–0F15 (January 2008)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Brown, M., Seales, W.: Document restoration using 3d shape: A general deskewing algorithm for arbitrarily warped documents. In: Proc. Int. Conf. on Computer Vision, pp. 367–374 (July 2001)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bukhari, S.S., Shafait, F., Breuel, T.M.: Dewarping of document images using coupled-snakes. In: Proc. Int. Workshop on Camera-Based Document Analysis and Recognition, Barcelona, Spain, pp. 34–41 (July 2009)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Bukhari, S.S., Shafait, F., Breuel, T.M.: Improved document image segmentation algorithm using multiresolution morphology. In: SPIE Document Recognition and Retrieval XVIII, San Francisco, USA (January 2011)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Cutter, M.P., van Beusekom, J., Shafait, F., Breuel, T.M.: Unsupervised font reconstruction based on token co-occurrence. In: 10th ACM Symposium on Document Engineering, Manchester, UK (September 2010)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Cutter, M.P., van Beusekom, J., Shafait, F., Breuel, T.M.: Font group identification using reconstructed fonts. In: SPIE Document Recognition and Retrieval XVIII, San Francisco, USA (January 2011)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Keysers, D., Shafait, F., Breuel, T.M.: Document image zone classification - a simple high-performance approach. In: 2nd International Conference on Computer Vision Theory and Applications, Barcelona, Spain, pp. 44–51 (March 2007)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Selinger, P.: Potrace: a polygon-based tracing algorithm (2003), http://potrace.sourceforge.net
  11. 11.
    Shafait, F., van Beusekom, J., Keysers, D., Breuel, T.M.: Document cleanup using page frame detection. International Journal on Document Analysis and Recognition 11(2), 81–96 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Shafait, F., Breuel, T.M.: Document image dewarping contest. In: Proc. Int. Workshop on Camera-Based Document Analysis and Recognition, Curitiba, Brazil, pp. 181–188 (September 2007)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Shafait, F., Breuel, T.M.: The effect of border noise on the performance of projection based page segmentation methods. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence 33(4), 846–851 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Shafait, F., Keysers, D., Breuel, T.M.: Performance evaluation and benchmarking of six page segmentation algorithms. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence 30(6), 941–954 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Ulges, A., Lampert, C., Breuel, T.M.: Document capture using stereo vision. In: Proc. ACM Symposium on Document Engineering, pp. 198–200. ACM (2004)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Vincent, L.: Google book search: Document understanding on a massive scale. In: Int. Conf. on Document Analysis and Recognition, Curitiba, Brazil, pp. 819–823 (September 2007)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Yamashita, A., Kawarago, A., Kaneko, T., Miura, K.: Shape reconstruction and image restoration for non-flat surfaces of documents with a stereo vision system. In: Proc. Int. Conf. on Pattern Recognition, pp. 482–485 (2004)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Faisal Shafait
    • 1
  • Michael Patrick Cutter
    • 2
  • Joost van Beusekom
    • 1
  • Syed Saqib Bukhari
    • 2
  • Thomas M. Breuel
    • 2
  1. 1.German Research Center for Artificial Intelligence (DFKI)KaiserslauternGermany
  2. 2.University of KaiserslauternGermany

Personalised recommendations