Building Socioemotional Environments in Metaverses for Virtual Teams in Healthcare: A Conceptual Exploration

Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 7231)


Metaverses are 3-dimentional (3D) virtual environments that allow people to interact with each other through software agents without physical limitations. There is great interest in the use of Metaverses for health and medical education. This paper examines the application of metaverses for supporting effective collaboration and knowledge sharing in virtual teams. Virtual teams have been used in health/medical area, such as home healthcare. However, the management of virtual teams is challenging. This study proposes that metaverses have the potential to provide socioemotional environments where individuals socially interact with others. Such socioemotional environments have the potential to facilitate effective collaboration and knowledge sharing in virtual teams. Building on previous research, we developed a conceptual model for understanding how metaverses enable the development of social-emotional environments in virtual teams.


Metaverse Virtual teams Socioemotional environment Collaboration 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Powell, A., Piccoli, G., Ives, B.: Virtual teams: A review of current literature and directions for future research. Database for Advances in Information Systems 35(1), 6–36 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Pitsillides, A., et al.: DITIS: Virtual collaborative teams for home healthcare. Journal of Mobile Multimedia 2(1) (2006)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Khazanchi, D., Zigurs, I.: Patterns for effective management of virtual projects: Theory and evidence. International Journal of Electronic Collaboration 2(3), 25–49 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Majchrzak, A., et al.: Technology adaptation: The case of a computer supported inter-organizational virtual team. MIS Quarterly 24(4), 569–600 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Brodkin, J.: Sun building collaborative, virtual world (2007)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Davis, A., et al.: Avatars, people, and metaverses: Foundations for research in metaverses. Journal of the Association for Information Systems 10(2), 99–117 (2009)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Bainbridge, W.S.: The scientific research potential of virtual worlds. Science 317, 472–476 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Owens, D., et al.: An empirical investigation of virtual world projects and metaverse technology capabilities. The DATA BASE for Advances in Information Systems 42(1), 74–101 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Biocca, F., Harms, C., Burgoon, J.: Criteria and scope conditions for a theory and measure of social presence. In: Presence 2001, 4th Annual International Workshop, Philadelphia, PA (2001)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Schroeder, R., Heldal, I., Tromp, J.: The usability of collaborative virtual environments and methods for the analysis of interaction. Presence 16(5), 655–667 (2006)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Sempsey, J.J., Johnston, D.A.: The psychological dynamics and social climate of text-based virtual reality. Journal of Virtual Environments 5(1) (2000)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Anderson, A., Dossick, C.S., Iorio, J.: Avatars, Text, and Miscommunication: The Impact of Communication Richness on Global Virtual Team Collaboration. Working Paper (2011)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Magnenat-Thalmann, N., Kim, H., Egges, A., Garchery, S.: Believability and Interaction in Virtual Worlds. In: Proceedings of the 11th International Multimedia Modelling Conference, Melbourne, Australia (2005)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Bente, G., et al.: Avatar-mediated networking: Increasing social presence and interpersonal trust in net-based collaborations. Human Communication Research 34(2), 287–318 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Redfern, S., Naughton, N.: Collaborative virtual environments to support communication and community in internet-based distance education. Journal of Information Technology Education 1(3) (2002)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Tanis, M., Postmes, T.: Social cues and impression formation in CMC. Journal of Communication 53, 676–693 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Sheridan, T.B.: Musings on telepresence and virtual presence. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments 1, 120–126 (1992)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Slater, M., Usoh, M.: Representations systems, perceptual position, and presence in immersive virtual environments. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments 2, 221–233 (1993)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Rheingold, H.: Virtual reality. Summit Books, New York (1991)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Lee, K.M.: Presence, Explicated. Communication Theory 14(1), 27–50 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Whittaker, S.: Theories and methods in mediated communciation. In: Graesser, M.G.A., Goldman, S. (eds.) The Hand Book of Discourse Processes, pp. 243–286. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah (2002)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Foster, D., Meech, J.: The social dimensions of virtual reality. In: Carr, K., England, R. (eds.) Simulated and Virtual Realities: Elements of Perception. Taylor and Francis, London (1995)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Blascovich, J.: A theoretical model of social influence for increasing the utility of collaborative virtual environments. In: Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Collaborative Virtual Environments 2002, Bonn, Germany. ACM, New York (2002)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Shi, Y., Zhang, X., Wan, J., Kou, G., Peng, Y., Guo, Y.: Comparison study of two kernel-based learning algorithms for predicting the distance range between antibody interface residues and antigen surface. International Journal of Computer Mathematics 84, 690–707 (2007)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Shi, Y., Zhang, X., Wan, J., Wang, Y., Ying, W., Cao, Z., Guo, Y.: Predicting the Distance between Antibody’s Interface Residue And Antigen To Recognize Antigen Types By Support Vector Machine. Neural Computing & Applications 16, 481–490 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Zheng, J., Zhuang, W., Yan, N., Kou, G., Erichsen, D., McNally, C., Peng, H., Cheloha, A., Shi, C., Shi, Y.: Classification of HIV-1 Mediated Neuronal Dendritic and Synaptic Damage Using Multiple Criteria Linear Programming. Neuroinformatics 2, 303–326 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Chen, Z.Y., Li, J.P., Wei, L.W.: A multiple kernel support vector machine scheme for feature selection and rule extraction from gene expression data of cancer tissue. Artificial Intelligence in Medicine 41(2), 161–175 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Kou, G., Peng, Y., Chen, Z., Shi, Y.: Multiple criteria mathematical programming for multi-class classification and application in network intrusion detection. Information Sciences 179(4), 371–381 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Shi, Y., Tian, Y., Chen, X., Zhang, P.: Regularized Multiple Criteria Linear Programs for Classification. Science in China Series F: Information Sciences 52, 1812–1820 (2009)MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Peng, Y., Kou, G., Shi, Y., Chen, Z.: A Descriptive Framework for the Field of Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery. International Journal of Information Technology and Decision Making 7(4), 639–682 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Peng, Y., Kou, G., Shi, Y., Chen, Z.: A Multi-Criteria Convex Quadratic Programming Model for Credit Data Analysis. Decision Support Systems 44, 1016–1030 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Cheng, S., Dai, R., Xu, W., Shi, Y.: Research on Data Mining and Knowledge Management and Its Applications in China’s Economic Development: Significance and Trend. International Journal of Information Technology and Decision Making 5(4), 585–596 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Shi, Y., Peng, Y., Kou, G., Chen, Z.: Classifying Credit Card Accounts for Business Intelligence and Decision Making: A Multiple-Criteria Quadratic Programming Approach. International Journal of Information Technology and Decision Making 4, 581–600 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Kou, G., Peng, Y., Shi, Y., Wise, M., Xu, W.: Discovering Credit Cardholders’ Behavior by Multiple Criteria Linear Programming. Annals of Operations Research 135, 261–274 (2005)MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    He, J., Liu, X., Shi, Y., Xu, W., Yan, N.: Classifications of Credit Cardholder Behavior by using Fuzzy Linear Programming. International Journal of Information Technology and Decision Making 3, 633–650 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Zheng, J., Zhuang, W., Yan, N., Kou, G., Erichsen, D., McNally, C., Peng, H., Cheloha, A., Shi, C., Shi, Y.: Classification of HIV-1 Mediated Neuronal Dendritic and Synaptic Damage Using Multiple Criteria Linear Programming. Neuroinformatics 2, 303–326 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Research Center on Fictitious Economy and Data ScienceCASBeijingChina
  2. 2.College of Information Science and TechnologyUniversity of NebraskaOmahaU.S.A.

Personalised recommendations