Activity-Aware Mental Stress Detection Using Physiological Sensors
Continuous stress monitoring may help users better understand their stress patterns and provide physicians with more reliable data for interventions. Previously, studies on mental stress detection were limited to a laboratory environment where participants generally rested in a sedentary position. However, it is impractical to exclude the effects of physical activity while developing a pervasive stress monitoring application for everyday use. The physiological responses caused by mental stress can be masked by variations due to physical activity.
We present an activity-aware mental stress detection scheme. Electrocardiogram (ECG), galvanic skin response (GSR), and accelerometer data were gathered from 20 participants across three activities: sitting, standing, and walking. For each activity, we gathered baseline physiological measurements and measurements while users were subjected to mental stressors. The activity information derived from the accelerometer enabled us to achieve 92.4% accuracy of mental stress classification for 10-fold cross validation and 80.9% accuracy for between-subjects classification.
KeywordsMental stress electrocardiogram galvanic skin response physical activity heart rate variability decision tress Bayes net support vector machine stress classifier
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 5.Cannon, W.: Bodily Change in Pain, Hunger, Fear and Rage: An Account of Recent Research into the Function of Emotional Excitement. Appleton, New York (1915)Google Scholar
- 7.Dedovic, K., Renwick, R., Mahani, N.K., Engert, V., Lupien, S.J., Pruessner, J.C.: The Montreal imaging stress task: Using functional imaging to investigate the effects of perceiving and processing psychosocial stress in the human brain. Journal Psychiatry Neuroscience 30, 319–325 (2005)Google Scholar
- 8.Dubin, D.: Rapid Interpretation of EKG’s. Cover Publishing (2000)Google Scholar
- 9.Hall, M., Frank, E., Holmes, G., Pfahringer, B., Reutemann, P., Witten, I.H.: The WEKA Data Mining Software: An Update. SIGKDD Explorations 11 (2009)Google Scholar
- 13.Kusserow, M., Amft, O., Troster, G.: Psychophysiological body activation characteristics in daily routines. In: IEEE International Symposium on Wearable Computers, pp. 155–156 (2009)Google Scholar
- 14.Lim, T.-S., Loh, W.-Y., Cohen, W.: A comparison of prediction accuracy, complexity, and training time of thirty-three old and new classification algorithms. Machine Learning 39 (2000)Google Scholar
- 17.T.F. of the European Society of Cardiology, The North American Society of Pacing, and Electrophysiology. Heart rate variability: Standards of measurement, physiological interpretation, and clinical use. European Heart Journal 17(2), 1043–1065 (1996)Google Scholar
- 18.Olguin, D., Pentland, Y.: Human activity recognition: Accuracy across common locations for wearable sensors. In: Proc. 10th International Symposium Wearable Computer, pp. 11–13 (2006)Google Scholar
- 19.Pan, J., Tompkins, W.J.: A real-time QRS detection algorithm. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering BME-32(3), 230–236 (1985)Google Scholar
- 23.Salahuddin, L., Cho, J., Jeong, M.G., Kim, D.: Ultra short term analysis of heart rate variability for monitoring mental stress in mobile settings. In: 29th Annual International Conference of the IEEE, Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, EMBS 2007, pp. 4656–4659 (August 2007)Google Scholar
- 24.Schumm, J., Bächlin, M., Setz, C., Arnrich, B., Roggen, D., Tröster, G.: Effect of movements on the electrodermal response after a startle event. In: Proceedings of 2nd International Conference on Pervasive Computing Technologies for Healthcare, Pervasive Health (2008)Google Scholar
- 26.Sloten, J.V., Verdonck, P., Nyssen, M., Haueisen, J.: Influence of mental stress on heart rate and heart rate variability. In: International Federation for Medical and Biological Engineering Proceedings, pp. 1366–1369 (2008)Google Scholar
- 30.Van Steenis, H., Tulen, J.: The effects of physical activities on cardiovascular variability in ambulatory situations. In: Proceedings of the 19th Annual International Conference of the IEEE, Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, vol. 1, pp. 105–108 (November 1997)Google Scholar
- 32.Wilhelm, F.H., Pfaltz, M.C., Grossman, P., Roth, W.T.: Distinguishing emotional from physical activation in ambulatory psychophysiological monitoring. Biomedical Sciences Instrumentation 42, 458–463 (2006)Google Scholar
- 33.Zhai, J., Barreto, A.: Stress detection in computer users based on digital signal processing of noninvasive physiological variables. In: 28th Annual International Conference of the IEEE, Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, EMBS 2006, pp. 1355–1358 (September 2006)Google Scholar