The Concept of Security

Chapter
Part of the SpringerBriefs in Environment, Security, Development and Peace book series (BRIEFSSECUR, volume 3)

Abstract

Security is of vital importance. The term is frequently used to help raise consciousness of the importance of particular issues, which are then so labelled in the minds of the population at large (Buzan 1991, p. 370). However, security is an ‘essentially contested concept’ (Gallie 1956, p. 184; Buzan 1983, p. 6); a concept on which no consensus exists. This conceptual vagueness makes it difficult to find a common ground for discussion. A feature shared by most definitions is some form of threat to cherished values (Williams 2008, p. 5), especially those threats that endanger a particular referent object’s survival in the near future. Accordingly, concern for survival entails a preoccupation with security.

Keywords

National Security United Nations Development Programme Security Threat Human Security Security Goal 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Allenby, Braden R., 2000: “Environmental Security: Concept and Implementation”, in: International Political Science Review, 21,1 (January): 5–21.Google Scholar
  2. Annan, Kofi, 2000a: Millenium Report: We the Peoples. The Role of the United Nations in the 21st century; at: <http://www.un.org/millenium/sg/report> (30 November 2011).
  3. Art, Robert, 1993: “Security”, in: Krieger, Joel (Ed.): The Oxford Companion to Politics of the World (New York – Oxford: Oxford University Press): 820–822.Google Scholar
  4. Barnett, Jon, 2001: The meaning of environmental security, Ecological Politics and policy in the new security era (London-NewYork: Zed).Google Scholar
  5. Beck, Ulrich, 1999: World Risk Society (Cambridge: Polity).Google Scholar
  6. Beck, Ulrich, 1986: Risikogesellschaft (München: C.H. Beck).Google Scholar
  7. Beck, Ulrich, 1992: Risk Society: Towards a New Modernity (Beverly Hills, CA: Sage).Google Scholar
  8. Birkmann, Jörn, 2006: Measuring Vulnerability to Natural HazardsTowards Disaster Resilient Societies (Tokyo: UNU Press).Google Scholar
  9. Bohle, Hans-Georg, 2009: “Sustainable Livelihood Security. Evolution and Application”, in: Brauch, Hans Günter; Oswald Spring, Úrsula; Grin, John; Mesjasz, Czeslaw; Kameri-Mbote, Patricia; Behera, Navnita Chadha; Chourou, Béchir; Krumme-nacher, Heinz (Eds.), 2009: Facing Global Environmental Change: Environmental, Human, Energy, Food, Health and Water Security Concepts. Hexagon Series on Human and Environmental Security and Peace, vol. 4 (Berlin – Heidelberg – New York: Springer): 521–528.Google Scholar
  10. Booth, Ken, 1999: “Three Tyrannies”, in: Dunne, T.; Wheeler, N.J. (Eds.): Human Rights in Global Politics (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press): 31–70.Google Scholar
  11. Booth, Ken, 2007: Theory of World Security (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
  12. Boyle, Kevin; Simonsen, Sigmund, 2004: Human Rights, Human Security and Disarmament (Geneva; United Nations Institute for Disarmament Research); at: <http://kms1.isn.ethz.ch/serviceengine/Files/ISN/47985/ichaptersection_singledocument/d30276d5-6f70-4567-82e7-a017a9ead3d4/en/03_Human+security-human+rights-disarmament.pdf > (2 November 2011).
  13. Brauch, Hans Günter, 2003: “Security and Environment Linkages in the Mediterranean: Three Phases of Research on Human and Environmental Security and Peace”. In: Brauch, Hans Günter; Liotta, P.H.; Marquina, Antonio/Rogers, Paul; Selim, Mohammed El-Sayed (Eds.): Security and Environment in the Mediterranean. Conceptualizing Security and Environmental Conflicts (Berlin – Heidelberg: Springer): 35–143.Google Scholar
  14. Brauch, Hans Günter, 2005: Threats, Challenges, Vulnerabilities and Risks in Environmental and Human security (Bonn: United Nations University. Institute for Environment and Human Security); at: <http://www.ehs.unu.edu/article/read/72> (12 October 2011).
  15. Brauch, Hans Günter, 2008: “From a Security towards a Survival Dilemma”, in: Brauch, Hans Günter; Oswald Spring, Úrsula; Mesjasz, Czeslaw; Grin, John; Dunay, Pal; Behera, Navnita Chadha; Chourou, Béchir; Kameri-Mbote, Patricia; Liotta, P.H., (Eds.): Globalization and Environmental Challenges: Reconceptualizing Security in the 21st Century. Hexagon Series on Human and Environmental Security and Peace, vol. 3 (Berlin–Heidelberg–New York: Springer): 537–552.Google Scholar
  16. Brauch, Hans Günter; Oswald Spring, Úrsula; Grin, John; Mesjasz, Czeslaw; Kameri-Mbote, Patricia; Behera, Navnita Chadha; Chourou, Béchir; Krumme-nacher, Heinz (Eds.), 2009: Facing Global Environmental Change: Environmental, Human, Energy, Food, Health and Water Security Concepts. Hexagon Series on Human and Environmental Security and Peace, vol. 4 (Berlin–Heidelberg–New York: Springer-Verlag).Google Scholar
  17. Brauch, Hans Günter, 2011: “Concepts of Security Threats, Challenges, Vulnerabilities and Risks”. In: Brauch, Hans-Günter/ Oswald Spring, Ursula/ Mesjasz, Czeslaw/ Grin, John/ Kameri-Mbote, Patricia/ Chourou, Béchir/ Dunay, Pal/ Birkmann, Jörn (Eds.): Coping with Global Environmental Change, Disasters and Security—Threats, Challenges, Vulnerabilities and Risks. Hexagon Series on Human and Environmental Security and Peace, vol. 5 (Berlin–Heidelberg–New York: Springer-Verlag, 2011): 61–106.Google Scholar
  18. Buzan, Barry, 1991. People, States & Fear: The National Security Problem in International Relations. 2nd edition. (Financial Times Prentice Hall: New Jersey)Google Scholar
  19. Buzan, Barry, 1983: People, States & Fear. The National Security Problem in International Relations (Brighton: Harvester Books).Google Scholar
  20. Chourou, Bechir, 2005: Promoting Human Security: Ethical, Normative and Educational Frameworks in the Arab States. United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (Paris: UNESCO); at: <http://www.unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0014/001405/140513e.pdf> (3 November 2011).
  21. CHS [Commission on Human Security], 2003: “Establishment of the commission”; at: <http://www.humansecurity-chs.org/about/Establishment.html> (8 December 2011).
  22. FAO [Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations], 2003: FAO trade reforms and food security conceptualizing the linkages; at: <http://www.fao.org/docrep/005/y4671e/y4671e06.htm#TopOfPage> (27 October 2011).
  23. Fierke, Karin, 2007: Security Clusters: Beyond Referent Object and Threat. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the International Studies Association 48th Annual Convention, Chicago. <http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p181066_index.html> (25 October 2011).
  24. Frankenberger, Timothy, 1996. “Measuring Household Livelihood Security: An Approach for Reducing Absolute Poverty.” Food Forum 24. Washington, D.C. Food Aid Management.Google Scholar
  25. Gallie, W. B., 1956: “Essentially Contested Concepts”, in: Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, New Series, 56: 167–198.Google Scholar
  26. Gantzel, Klaus Jürgen, 2000: “Über die Kriege nach dem zweiten Weltkrieg”, in: Wegner, Bernd (Ed.): Wie Kriege entstehen. Zum historischen Hintergrund von Staatenkonflikten (Paderborn: Schöningh Verlag): 299–318.Google Scholar
  27. Giddens, Anthony; Pierson, Christopher, 1998: Conversations With Anthony Giddens: Making Sense of Modernity (Palo Alto: Stanford University Press).Google Scholar
  28. Gibson, Stevyn D., 2005: “In the Eye of the Perfect Storm: Re-Imagining, Reforming and Refocusing Intelligence for Risk, Globalisation and Changing Societal Expectation”, in: Risk Management, 7,4: 23–41.Google Scholar
  29. Gregory, Peter, 2009: CISSP Guide to Security Essentials (Andover: Cengage Learning Services).Google Scholar
  30. Hampson, F.O.; Daudelin, J.; Hay, J.; Reid, H.; Martin, T., 2001: Madness in the Multitude: Human Security and World Disorder (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
  31. Henk, Dan, 2005: “Human Security: Relevance and Implications”, in: Parameters (Summer): 91–106. http://www.dtic.mil/dtic/tr/fulltext/u2/a486417.pdf (19 September 2012).
  32. IPCC [Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change], 2001: Working Group II: Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability; at: <http://www.ipcc.ch/ipccreports/tar/wg2/650.htm > (10 October 2011).
  33. Kasperson, Jeanne; Kasperson, Roger; Dow, Kristin, 2001: Global environmental risk (Tokyo-New York–Paris: United Nations Press; London: Earthscan).Google Scholar
  34. Krause, Keith; Williams, Michael C., 1997: “From Strategy to Security: Foundations of Critical Security Studies”. In: Krause, Keith; Williams, Michael C. (Eds.): Critical Security Studies: Concepts and Cases (New York: Routledge): 33–61.Google Scholar
  35. Liotta, P.H., 2002: “Boomerang Effect: the Convergence of National and Human Security”, in: Security Dialogue, 33,4 (December): 473–488.Google Scholar
  36. Lodgaard, Sverre, 2004: Human Security: Concept and Operationalization.; at:<www.hsph.harvard.edu/hpcr/events/hsworkshop/lodgaard.pdf> (30 November 2011).
  37. Mack, Andrew, 2004: “The Concept of Human Security”, in: BICC (Ed.): Brief 30: Promoting Security: But How and for Whom? (Bonn: BICC): 47–50.Google Scholar
  38. MacFarlane, S. Neil; Khong, Yuen Foong, 2006: Human Security and the UN: A Critical History (Bloomington: Indiana University Press).Google Scholar
  39. Nathan, Fabien, 2009: “Natural Disasters, Vulnerability and Human Security”, in: Brauch, Hans Günter; Oswald Spring, Úrsula; Grin, John; Mesjasz, Czeslaw; Kameri-Mbote, Patricia; Behera, Navnita Chadha; Chourou, Béchir; Krumme-nacher, Heinz (Eds.), 2009: Facing Global Environmental Change: Environmental, Human, Energy, Food, Health and Water Security Concepts. Hexagon Series on Human and Environmental Security and Peace, vol. 4 (Berlin – Heidelberg – New York: Springer-Verlag): 1121–1130.Google Scholar
  40. Nye, J.; Lynn-Jones, S., 1988: “International Security Studies: A Report of a Conference on the State of the Field”, in: International Security, 12,4 (Spring): 5−27.Google Scholar
  41. Owen, Taylor, 2004: “Human security – conflict, critique and consensus: Colloquium remarks and a proposal for a threshold-based definition”, in: Security Dialogue, 35,3 (September): 373−387.Google Scholar
  42. Palme, Olof, 1982: “Introduction”, in: Common security. A programme for disarmament. The report of the Independent Commission on Disarmament and Security Issues (London-Sydney: Pan): v-xiv.Google Scholar
  43. Paris, Roland, 2001: “Human Security: Paradigm Shift or Hot Air?”, in: International Security, 26, 2 (Fall): 87−102.Google Scholar
  44. Sato, M., 2007: “Human Security and Japanese Diplomacy: Debates on the Role of Human Security in Japanese Policy”, in: Shani, Giorgio; Sato, Makoto; Pasha, Mustapha Kamal (Eds.): Protecting Human Security in a Post 9/11 World: Critical and Global Insights (New York–Houndsmill–Basingstoke−Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan): 83−94.Google Scholar
  45. Seeger, M. W./ Sellnow, T. L./ Ulmer, R. R., 1998. “Communication, organization, and crisis”, in: Communication Yearbook, 21: 231–275.Google Scholar
  46. Singer, J. David, 1958: “Threat-Perception and the Armament-Tension Dilemma”, in: Journal of Conflict Resolution, 2,1 (March): 93−94.Google Scholar
  47. Slovic, Paul, 2000. The Perception of Risk. (Virginia: Earthscan).Google Scholar
  48. Smit, Barry; Pilifosova, Olga, 1999: Adaptation to Climate Change in the Context of Sustainable Development and Equity”; at: <http://www.ipcc.ch/ipccreports/tar/wg2/pdf/wg2TARchap18.pdf> (20 November 2011).
  49. Study Group on Europe’s Security Capabilities, 2004: A Human Security Doctrine for Europe: The Barcelona Report of the Study Group on Europe’s Security Capabilities; at: <http://www.lse.ac.uk/Depts/global/Publications/HumanSecurityDoctrine.pdf> (12 December 2011).
  50. Stone, Marianne, 2009: “Security According to Buzan: A Comprehensive Security Analysis”, in: Security Discussion Papers, Series 1. (Spring); at: <http://geest.msh-paris.fr/IMG/pdf/Security_for_Buzan.mp3.pdf> (3 November 2011).
  51. Stepanova, Ekatarina, 2008: Terrorism in assymetrical conflict. Ideological and structural aspects. SIPRI Research Report No. 23 (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
  52. Tajbakhsh, Shahrbanu; Chenoy Anuradha M.; Tadjbakhsh, Chen, 2007: Human Security: Concepts and Implication (London: Routledge).Google Scholar
  53. Thomas, Nicholas; Tow, William, 2002: “The Utility of Human Security; Sovereignty and Humanitarian Intervention”, in: Security Dialog, 33,2: 177−192.Google Scholar
  54. Ulusoy, Hasan, 2003: “Revisiting Security Communities After the Cold War: The Constructivist Perspective”. Perceptions, No.8, (September−November); at: <http://www.sam.gov.tr/perceptions/Volume8/September−November2003/HasanUlusoy6Kasim2003.pdf> (20 October 2011).
  55. UN Department of Public Information, 2004: A more secure world:Our shared responsibility Report of the High-level Panel on Threats, Challenges and Change; at: <http://www.un.org/secureworld/report.pdf> (7 October 2011).
  56. UNDP [United Nations Development Programme], 1990: Human Development Report, 1990 (New York – Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
  57. UNDP, 1994: Human Development Report 1994: New Dimensions of Human Security (New York – Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
  58. United Nations International Strategy for Disaster Reduction (UN/ISDR), 2002. Guidelines for reducing flood losses. http://www.unisdr.org/files/558_7639.pdf (19 September 2012).
  59. Van Buuren, Jelle, 2010: “Security as a commodity. The ethical dilemmas of private security services. International Peace Research Institute in Oslo”; at: <http://shop.ceps.be/system/files/book/2010/03/INEX%20PB6%20van%20Buuren.pdf> (27 November 2011).
  60. Warner, Jeroen F., 2006: “More Sustainable Participation? Multi-Stakeholder Platforms for Integrated Catchment Management”, in: International Journal of Water Resources Development, 22,1 (March): 15−35.Google Scholar
  61. Weber, Max, 2005: Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft. Grundriss der verstehenden Soziologie (Frankfurt a.M.: Zweitausendeins).Google Scholar
  62. Weldes, J., 1996: “Constructing the National Interest”, in: European Journal of International Relations, 2,3: 275–318.Google Scholar
  63. Wisner, Ben; Blaikie, Piers; Cannon, Terry; Davis, Ian, 2004: At Risk: Natural Hazards, People’s Vulnerability and Disaster (London: Routledge).Google Scholar
  64. Williams, Paul, 2008: Security studies: An Introduction (London − New York: Routledge).Google Scholar
  65. Wolfers, Arnold, 1962: “National Security as an Ambiguous Symbol”, in: Wolfers, Arnold (Ed.): Discord and Collaboration. Essays on International Politics (Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press): 147−165.Google Scholar
  66. World Commission on Environment and Development (WCED), 1987: Our Common Future (Oxford: Oxford University Press); at: <http://www.un-documents.net/a42r187.htm (12 December 2011).
  67. Zeitoun, Mark, 2006: Palestinian-Israeli water: secure or violated? Securitization, Opportunization and Violation along the Jordan River (Jerusalem: Israel/Palestine Centre for Research and Information); at: <http://www.ipcri.org/watconf/papers/mark.pdf> (7 December 2011).

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Weisenheim am BergGermany

Personalised recommendations