Exploration and Visualization of Administrator Network in Wikipedia

  • Jamal Yousaf
  • Juanzi Li
  • Haisu Zhang
  • Lei Hou
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 7235)

Abstract

Wikipedia has become one of the most widely used knowledge systems on the Web. It contains the resources and information with different qualities contributed by different set of authors. A special group of authors named administrators plays an important role for content quality in Wikipedia. Understanding the behaviors of administrators in Wikipedia can facilitate the management of Wikipedia system, and empower some applications such as article recommendation and expertise administrator finding for given articles. This paper addresses the work of the exploration and visualization of the administrator network in Wikipedia. Administrator network is firstly constructed by using co-editing relationship and six characteristics for administrators are proposed to describe the behaviors of administrators in Wikipedia from different perspectives. Quantified calculation of these characteristics is then put forwarded by using social network analysis techniques. Topic model is used to relate content of Wikipedia to the interest diversity of administrators. Based on the media wiki history records from the January 2010 to January 2011, we develop an administrator exploration prototype system which can rank the selected characteristics for administrators and can be used as a decision support system. Furthermore, some meaningful observations are found to show that the administrator network is a healthy small world community and a strong centralization of the network around some hubs/stars is obtained to mean a considerable nucleus of very active administrators that seems to be omnipresent. These top ranked administrators ranking is found to be consistent with the number of barn stars awarded to them.

Keywords

Wikipedia social network analysis human factors visualization 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Ding, Y.: Scientific collaboration and endorsement: Network analysis of coauthorship and citation networks. J. Informetrics, 187–203 (2011); Galam, S.: Tailor based allocations for multiple authorship: a fractional gh-index. Scientometrics 89(1), 365–379 (2011)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Yan, E., Ding, Y.: Applying centrality measures to impact analysis: A coauthorship network analysis. CoRR (2010)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Panzarasa, P., Opsahl, T., Carley, K.M.: Patterns and dynamics of users’ behavior and interaction Network analysis of an online community. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 60(5), 911–932 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Tang, L.V.-S., Biuk-Aghai, R.P., Fong, S.: Method for measuring the co-authorship relationship in mediawiki. In: Int. Sym. Wikis. ACM (2008) Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Rodriguez, M.A., Pepe, A.: On the relationship between the structural and socioacademic communities of coauthorship network. Journal of Informetrics, 195–201 (2008)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Wilkinson, M., Huberman, A.: Cooperation and Quality in Wikipedia. In: Proceedings of the 2007 International Symposium on Wikis, October 21-23, pp. 157–164 (2007)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Ortega, F., Barahona, M.: Quantitative Analysis of the Wikipedia Community of Users. In: Proceedings of the 2007 International Symposium on Wikis, pp. 75–86 (2007)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Vidgen, R., Henneberg, S., Naude, P.: What sort of community is the European Conference on Information Systems? European Journal of Information Systems 16(1), 5–19 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Acedo, F.J., Barroso, C., Casanueva, C., Galán, J.L.: Co-authorship in management and organizational studies: an empirical and network analysis. Journal of Management Studies 43(5), 957–983 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Yin, L., Kretschmer, H., Hanneman, R.A., Liu, Z.: Connection and stratification in research collaboration: An analysis of the COLLNET network. Information Processing and Management 42, 1599–1613 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Yoshikane, F., Nozawa, T., Tsuji, K.: Comparative Analysis of Co-authorship Networks Considering Authors’ Roles in Collaboration: Differences between the Theoretical and Application Areas. In: ISSI 2005, vol. 2, pp. 509–516 (July 2005)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Liu, X., Bollen, J., Nelson, M.L.: Co-authorship networks in the digital library research community. Information Processing and Management 41, 1462–1480 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Voss, J.: Measuring Wikipedia. In: Proceedings International Conference of the International Society for Scientometrics and Informatics (2005)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Elmacioglu, E., Lee, D.: On six degrees of separation in dblp-db and more. ACM SIGMOD 34, 33–40 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Cheng, A., Friedman, E.: Sybilproof reputation mechanisms. In: Proc. of the ACM SIGCOMM Workshop on Economics of Peer-to-Peer Systems. ACM Press (2005)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Hirsch, J.E.: An index to quantify an individual’s scientific research output. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA 102, 16569–16572 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Bryant, S.L., Forte, A., Bruckman, A.: Becoming Wikipedia: Transformation of participation in a collaborative online encyclopedia. In: Proceedings of SIGGROUP (2005)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Newman, M.E.J.: Coauthorship networks and patterns of scientific collaboration. P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 101(1), 5200–5205 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Hassan, A.E., Holt, R.C.: The Small World of Software Reverse Engineering. In: Proceedings of the 11th Working Conference on Reverse Engineering, November 08-12, pp. 278–283 (2004)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Kretschmer, H.: Author productivity and geodesic distance in bibliographic co-authorship networks and visibility on the Web. Scientometrics 60(3), 409–420 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Nascimento, M.A., Sander, J., Pound, J.: Analysis of SIGMOD’s co authorship graph. ACM SIGMOD Record 32(3), 8–10 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Blei, D.M., Ng, A.Y., Jordan, M.I.: Latent dirichlet allocation. The Journal of Machine Learning Research 3, 993–1022 (2003)MATHGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Barabasi, A.-L.: Linked-the new science of networks. Perseus Press, Cambridge (2002)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Chen, C., Paul, R.J.: Visualizing a Knowledge Domain’s Intellectual Structure. IEEE Computer 34(3), 65–71 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Tauro, S.L., Palmer, C., Siganos, G., Faloutsos, M.: A simple conceptual model for the internet topology. In: GLOBECOM, vol. 3, pp. 1667–1671 (2001)Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Newman, M.E.J.: The structure of scientific collaboration networks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science of the United States of America 98(2), 404–409 (2001b)MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Watts, D.J., Strogatz, S.H.: Collective dynamics of ’small-world’ networks. Nature 393, 440–442 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jamal Yousaf
    • 1
  • Juanzi Li
    • 1
  • Haisu Zhang
    • 2
  • Lei Hou
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Computer Science and TechnologyTsinghua UniversityBeijingChina
  2. 2.PLA University of Science and TechnologyNanjingChina

Personalised recommendations