Intellectual Ability Data Obtaining and Processing for E-Learning System Adaptation

  • Vija Vagale
  • Laila Niedrite
Part of the Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing book series (LNBIP, volume 106)


In this article authors describe how an e-learning system can obtain data about learner, so that later it could offer individual content for each learner, based on the obtained data. Authors also describe how the Learning Management System (LMS) Moodle has adapted a standard quiz module interface for testing elementary school students and how students’ individual abilities could be measured more efficiently, for example, by measuring mathematical reaction time. For obtaining necessary testing results and partial processing a new module (TAnalizer) is offered, which is adapted to the Moodle environment. With this module one can gain precise data about each student’s testing process and students’ test results.


E-Learning User Model Adaptation Individualization Customization Personalization 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Al-Ajlan, A., Zedan, H.: Why Moodle. In: 12th IEEE International Workshop on Future Trends of Distributed Computing Systems, pp. 58–64. IEEE Press, Washington (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Brusilovsky, P., Maybury, M.P.: From Adaptive Hypermedia to the Adaptive Web. Communications of the ACM 45(5), 30–33 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Castello, J., Leris, D., Martinez, V., Sein-Echaluce, M.L.: Personalized Learning On The Moodle Platform Using The CICEI Conditionals: Support Course In Mathematics. In: INTED 2010, pp. 277–282. IATED Press, Valencia (2010)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Daugulis, P., Shapkova, A.: Research of Mathematical Reaction Time of Schoolchildren for Improving Mathematical Education. In: Daugulis, P. (ed.) 11th International Conference Teaching Mathematics: Retrospective and Perspectives. Daugavpils (2010)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Eirinaki, M., Vazirgiannis, M.: Web Mining for Web Personalization. ACM Transactions Internet Technology 3, 1–27 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Graf, S.: Adaptivity in Learning Management Systems Focussing on Learning Styles. PhD Thesis. Vienna University of Technology, Austria (2007)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Graf, S., List, B.: An Evaluation of Open Source E-Learning Platforms Stressing Adaptation Issues. In: 15th IEEE International Conference on Learning Technologies, pp. 163–165. IEEE Press, Ischia (2005)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Hauger, D., Köck, M.: State of the Art of Adaptivity in E-Learning Platforms. In: 15th Workshop on Adaptivity and User Modeling in Interactive System, pp. 355–360. LWA Press, Halle (2007)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Limongelli, C., Sciarrone, F., Vaste, G.: Personalized e-Learning in Moodle: the Moodle_LS System. Journal of e-Learning and Knowledge Society 7(1), 49–58 (2011)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Limongelli, C., Sciarrone, F., Temperini, M., Vaste, G.: Adaptive Learning with the LS-Plan System: a Field Evaluation. IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies 2(3), 203–215 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Lin, H.-T., Wang, C.-H., Lin, C.-F., Yuan, S.-M.: Annotating Learning Materials on Moodle LMS. In: ICCTD 2009, pp. 455–459. IEEE Press, Kota Kinabalu (2009)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Ling, M.: Web Content Personalization and Task Complexity in e-Commerce Decision Making. Ph.D. dissertation. ETD collection for University of Nebraska, Lincoln (2006) Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Meyer, D.E., Osman, A.M., Irwin, D.E., Yantis, S.: Modern Mental Chronometry. Biological Psychology 26, 3–67 (1988)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Moodle statistics,
  15. 15.
    Raising competence of professional education teachers,
  16. 16.
    Rauch, L., Andrelczyk, K., Kusiak J.: Agent-based Algorithm Dedicated to Personalization of e-Learning Courses. In: 20th EADTU, Lisbon (2007) Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Rossi, G., Schwabe, D., Guimar, R.: Designing Personalized Web Applications. In: 10th International Conference on World Wide Web, pp. 275–284. ACM Press, New York (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Rubio Reyes, B., Galan Moreno, M., Ocon Carreras, A., Delgado Cejudo, G., Rubio Royo, E.: Some Technological Solutions To Improve The Efficiency And Management of Learning Using Moodle Platform. In: INTED 2010, pp. 354–360. IATED Press, Valencia (2010)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Sehring, H., Bossung, S., Schmidt, J.: Active Learning By Personalization – Lessons Learnt from Research in Conceptual Content Management. In: 1st International Conference on Web Information Systems and Technologies, pp. 496–503. INSTICC Press, Miami (2005)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Vagale, V.: Utilization of CMS in Educational System in Latvia. In: 6th International Conference, Person. Color. Nature. Music, pp. 262–269. Saule Press, Daugavpils (2009)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Teachers of general education further education,
  22. 22.
    Weibelzahl, S., Weber, G.: Evaluating the Inference Mechanism of Adaptive Learning Systems. In: Brusilovsky, P., Corbett, A.T., de Rosis, F. (eds.) UM 2003. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 2702, pp. 154–162. Springer, Heidelberg (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Won, K.: Personalization: Definition, Status, and Challenges Ahead. Journal of Object Technology 1(1), 29–40 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Vija Vagale
    • 1
  • Laila Niedrite
    • 1
  1. 1.Faculty of ComputingUniversity of LatviaRigaLatvia

Personalised recommendations