802.11p, also known as WAVE, is a standard protocol intended for future traffic systems in order to support safety and commercial non-safety applications for vehicular communication. 802.11p is modified from 802.11a, and both are based on OFDM. The main difference between 802.11a and 802.11p is that the latter is proposed to use 10 MHz frequency bandwidth (half of bandwidth of 802.11a) in order to make the signal more robust against fading and increase the tolerance for multipath propagation effects of signals in a vehicular environment. In this paper, we investigate the performance difference between 802.11a and 802.11p for Vehicle-to-Infrastructure communication through real-world experiments. We measure contact duration and losses of 802.11p and 802.11a in both LOS and NLOS environments. In addition, we investigate their throughput with different modulations over various distances between OBU and RSU to evaluate the feasibility of using rate adaptation for non-safety V-to-I applications.


802.11p guard interval multipath modulation 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Family of Standards for Wireless Access in Vehicular Environments (WAVE). IEEE 1609 Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Standard specification for telecommunications and information exchange between roadside and vehicle systems -5.9 GHz Band Dedicated Short Range Communications (DSRC) Medium Access Control (MAC) and Physical Layer (PHY) Specifications. In: ASTM, (E2213-03) (2003) Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bai, F., El Batt, T., Holland, G., Krishnan, H., Sadekar, V.: Towards characterizing and classifying communication-based automotive applications from a wireless networking perspective. In: First IEEE Workshop on Automotive Networking and Applications (AutoNet 2006), in conjunction with Globecom (2006) Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Jiang, D., Taliwal, V., Meier, A., Holfelder, W., Herrtwich, R.: Design of 5.9 GHz DSRC-based vehicular safety communication. IEEE Wireless Communications, 36–43 (2006)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Draft P802.11p/D3.0: the IEEE 802.11 Working Group of the IEEE 802 Committee (2007) Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    IEEE 1609.3 Trial-Use Standard for Wireless Accesses in Vehicular Environments (WAVE) - Networking Services. IEEE Vehicular Technology Society (2006) Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Hartenstein, H., Laberteaux, K.: VANET Vehicular Applications and Inter-Networking Technologies. John Wiley & Sons Inc., US (2010)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Müller, M.: WLAN 802.11p measurements for vehicle to vehicle (V2V) DSRC Application Note. In: Rohde & Schwarz (2009) Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Khan, A., Sadhu, S., Yeleswarapu, M.: A comparative analysis of DSRC and 802.11 over Vehicular Ad hoc Networks. Dept. of Computer Science, University of California (2008)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Keeratiwintakorn, P., Thepnorarat, E., Russameesawang, A.: Ubiquitous Communication for V2V and V2I for Thailand Intelligent Transportation System. In: NTC International Conference, Thailand (2009) Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    ITRI WAVE/DSRC Communication Unit (IWCU) User’s Guide, Version 1.03 Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Lacage, M., Manshaei, M.H., Turletti, T.: IEEE 802.11 Rate Adaptation: A Practical Approach. In: ACM MSWiM (2004)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Böhm, A., Jonsson, M.: Position-Based Data Traffic Prioritization in Safety-Critical, Real-Time Vehicle-to-Infrastructure Communication. In: Proc. IEEE Vehicular Networking and Applications Workshop (VehiMobil 2009) in conjunction with the IEEE International conference on Communication (ICC), Dresden, Germany (2009)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Eichler, S.: Performance Evaluation of the IEEE 802.11p WAVE Communication Standard. In: IEEE 66th Vehicular Technology Conference, VTC 2007, pp. 2199–2203 (2007) Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Msadaa, I.C., Cataldi, P., Filali, F.: A Comparative Study between 802.11p and Mobile WiMAX-based V2I Communication Networks. In: 2010 Fourth International Conference on Next Generation Mobile Applications, Services and Technologies (NGMAST), pp. 186–191 (2010)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Fuxjäger, P., et al.: IEEE 802.11p Transmission Using GNURadio. In: Proceedings of the IEEE 6th Karlsruhe Workshop on Software Radios (WSR), pp. 83–86 (2010) Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Tan, I.N.L., Tang, W., Laberteaux, K., Bahai, A.: Measurement and analysis of wireless channel impairments in DSRC vehicular communications. Elect. Eng. Comput. Sci. Dept., Univ. California, Berkeley, Berkeley, CA, Tech. Rep. UCB/EECS-2008-33 (2008) Google Scholar
  18. 18.
  19. 19.
    Shankar, P., Nadeem, T., Rosca, J., Iftode, L.: CARS: Context Aware Rate Selection for Vehicular Networks. In: ICNP (2008)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Lee, K.C., Navarro, J.M., Chong, T.Y., Uichin, L., Gerla, M.: Trace-based Evaluation of Rate Adaptation Schemes in Vehicular Environments. In: Vehicular Technology Conference (VTC 2010), pp. 16–19 (Spring 2010)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Wang, Z., Hassan, M.: How much of DSRC is available for non-safety use. In: ACM VANET 2008, pp. 23–29 (2008) Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Miller, J., Horowitz, E.: FreeSim – A Free Real-Time Freeway Traffic Simulator. In: IEEE 10th Intelligent Transportation Systems Conference (2007)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Lan, K.C., Huang, C.M., Tsai, C.Z.: On the locality of vehicle movement for vehicle-infrastructure communication. In: Eight International Conference on ITS Telecommunications, pp. 116–120 (October 2008) Google Scholar
  24. 24.
  25. 25.

Copyright information

© ICST Institute for Computer Science, Social Informatics and Telecommunications Engineering 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Wei-Yen Lin
    • 1
  • Mei-Wen Li
    • 1
  • Kun-Chan Lan
    • 1
  • Chung-Hsien Hsu
    • 2
  1. 1.Computer Science and Information EngineeringTainan CityTaiwan (R.O.C.)
  2. 2.Information and Communications Research LaboratoriesHsinchuTaiwan

Personalised recommendations