The effect of different market opening structures on market quality – experimental evidence

  • Gernot Hinterleitner
  • Philipp Hornung
  • Ulrike Leopold-Wildburger
  • Roland Mestel
  • Stefan Palan
Conference paper
Part of the Operations Research Proceedings book series (ORP)


This experimental study focuses on the effect of opening call auctions on market quality. Our examination extends the existing market microstructure literature in two respects. First, in addition of analyzing the market opening, we examine the effect of an opening call auction on the subsequent continuous trading phase. Second, we analyze two different kinds of call auctions with different pre-opening transparency levels. We find that an opening call auction significantly increases the informational efficiency of opening prices and leads to higher market quality of the subsequent continuous double auction market as compared to the continuous double auction alone.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Arifovic, Jasmina / Ledyard, John (2007): Call market book information and efficiency, Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control 31, S. 1971-2000.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Barclay, M. / T. Hendershott (2004): Liquidity Externalities and Adverse Selection: Evidence from Trading after Hours, Journal of Finance, 59 (2004), 681710.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Baruch, Shmuel (2005): Who benefits from an open limit order book?, Journal of Business, Vol. 78, No. 4, S. 1267-1306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Camilleri, Silvio John / Green, Christopher J. (2009): The impact of the suspension of opening and closing call auctions: Evidence from the national stock exchange of India, International Journal of Banking, Accounting and Finance 1, No. 3, S. 257-284.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Chang, Rosita P. / Rhee, S. Ghon / Stone, Gregory R. / Tang, Ning (2008): How does the call market method affect price efficiency? Evidence from the Singapore Stock Market, Journal of Banking and Finance 32, S. 2205-2219.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Comerton-Forde, Carole (1999): Do trading rules impact on market efficiency? A comparison of opening procedures on the Australian and Jakarta Stock Exchange, Pacific-Basin Finance Journal 7, S. 495-521.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Comerton-Forde, Carole / Lau, Sie Ting / McInish, Thomas (2007): Opening and Closing behavior following the introduction of call auctions in Singapore, Pacific-Basin Finance Journal 15, S. 18-35.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Comerton-Forde, Carole / Rydge, James (2004): A Review of Stock Market Microstructure, SIRCA, April 2004.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Comerton-Forde, Carole / Rydge, James / Burridge, Hayley (2007): Not all call auctions are created equal: evidence from Hongkong, Review of Quantitative Financial Accounting 29, S. 395-413.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Domowitz, Ian / Madhavan, Ananth (2001): Open Sesame: Alternative Opening Algorithms in Securities Markets, Schwartz, Robert A. (Hrsg.): The Electronic Call Auction: Market Mechanism and Trading, Building a Better Stock Market, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston, S. 375394.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Fischbacher, Urs (2007): z-Tree Zurich Toolbox for Ready-made Economic Experiments, Experimental Economics, Vol. 10, No. 2, 171-178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Friedman, Daniel (1993): How trading institutions affect financial market performance: Some laboratory evidence, Economic Inquiry 31, S. 410-435.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Gerace, Dionigi / Tian, Gary Gang / Zheng, Willa (2009): Call Auction Transparency and Market Liquidity: The Shanghai Experience, Working Paper.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Hoffmann, Peter / van Bommel, Jos (2010): Pre-Trade Transparency in Call Auctions: Quantity Discovery vs. Price Efficiency, Working Paper.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Madhavan, Ananth (1992): Trading Mechanisms in Securities Markets, Journal of Finance, 37, 2, S. 607-641.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Medrano, L. / Vives, X. (2001): Strategic behavior and price discovery, RAND Journal of Economics 32, S. 221248.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Pagano, Marco / Rell, Ailsa (1996): Transparency and Liquidity: A Comparison of Auction and DealerMarkets with informed trading, The Journal of Finance, Vol. 51, No. 2, S. 579-611.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Pagano, Michael S. / Peng, Lin / Schwartz, Robert A. (2010): Market Structure and Price Formation at Market Openings and Closings: Evidence from Nasdaqs Calls, Working Paper, Villanova University / Baruch College.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Theissen, Erik (2000): Market Structure, informational efficiency and liquidity: An experimental comparison of auction and dealer markets, Journal of FinancialMarkets 3, S. 333-363.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Gernot Hinterleitner
    • 1
  • Philipp Hornung
    • 1
  • Ulrike Leopold-Wildburger
    • 1
  • Roland Mestel
    • 2
  • Stefan Palan
    • 2
  1. 1.Institute of Statistics and Operations ResearchKarl-Franzens-University GrazGrazAustria
  2. 2.Institute of Banking and FinanceKarl-Franzens-University GrazGrazAustria

Personalised recommendations