Splitting Argumentation Frameworks: An Empirical Evaluation
In a recent paper Baumann  has shown that splitting results, similar to those known for logic programs under answer set semantics and default logic, can also be obtained for Dung argumentation frameworks (AFs). Under certain conditions a given AF A can be split into subparts A 1 and A 2 such that extensions of A can be computed by (1) computing an extension E 1 of A 1, (2) modifying A 2 based on E 1, and (3) combining E 1 and an extension E 2 of the modified variant of A 2. In this paper we perform a systematic empirical evaluation of the effects of splitting on the computation of extensions. Our study shows that the performance of algorithms may drastically improve when splitting is applied.
KeywordsEmpirical Evaluation Average Runtime Argumentation Framework Default Theory Labelling Algorithm
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.