Advancing Intercultural Competencies for Global Collaboration

Chapter

Abstract

Globalization is not a rite of passage, and culture appears to be the most neglected and underestimated source of challenge in global professional services. Academic research on national culture and cultural differences has identified dimensions with an effect on the functioning not only of societies and individuals, but also of organizations and project teams. Once cultural differences are recognized and understood, there is a better chance of building bridges across cultural gaps instead of seeking to achieve feigned homogeneity. Global managers need to develop a set of twelve affective, behavioural, and cognitive competencies for successful intercultural interaction. A targeted development of these key competencies requires a sound appraisal to identify individual strengths and limitations. They can be assessed and developed using ICCA™ (Intercultural Communication and Collaboration Appraisal) as a diagnosis framework. At its core, ICCA™ looks at the areas in which one’s environment is “different” from the culture one is going to work with. And using the Q methodology as a psychometric measurement tool, it charts a path towards advancing intercultural competencies by studying the manager’s subjective viewpoints.

Keywords

Cultural Difference Organizational Commitment Professional Service Time Personality Intercultural Communication 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Amelio WJ (2007) Worldsourcing replaces outsourcing. Available via BBC News Channel. http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/business/7133283.stm. Accessed 28 Oct 2011
  2. Bhawuk DPS, Brislin R (1992) The measurement of intercultural sensitivity using the concepts of individualism and collectivism. Int J Intercult Relat 16:413–436CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Chhokar JS, Brodbeck FC, House RJ (2007) Culture and leadership across the world: the GLOBE book of in-depth studies of 25 societies. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJGoogle Scholar
  4. Deardorff DK (2006) Identification and assessment of intercultural competence as a student outcome of internationalization. J Stud Int Educ 10:241–266CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Fantini AE (2009) Assessing intercultural competence. Issues and tools. In: Deardorff DK (ed) The SAGE handbook of intercultural competence. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CAGoogle Scholar
  6. Francis-Smythe J, Robertson I (1999) Time-related individual differences. Time Soc 8(2):273–292CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Graf A, Mertesacker M (2010) Interkulturelle Kompetenz als globaler Erfolgsfaktor. Z Manag 5:3–27. doi: 10.1007/S123540100115Z CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Hall (1959) The silent language. FawcettGoogle Scholar
  9. Hall (1976) Beyond culture. Anchor Books, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  10. Hofstede (1967–2007) Hofstede™ cultural dimensions. http://www.geert-hofstede.com. Accessed 26 Jan 2007
  11. House RJ, Hanges PJ, Javidan M, Dorfman PW, Gupta V (2004) Culture, leadership, and organizations. The GLOBE study of 62 societies. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CAGoogle Scholar
  12. Jha S (2011) Influence of psychological empowerment on affective, normative and continuance commitment. A study in the Indian IT industry. J Indian Bus Res 3(4):263–282MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Kaufmann CF, Lane PM, Lindquist JD (1991) Exploring more than 24 hours a day: a preliminary investigation of polychronic time use. J Consum Res 18(3):392–401CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Lindquist JD, Kaufman-Scarborough CJ (2007) The polychronic-monochronic tendency model. PMTS scale development and validation. Time Soc 16(2/3):269–301. doi: 10.1177/0961463X07080270 Google Scholar
  15. Messner W (2010) Intelligent IT Offshoring to India. Roadmaps for Emerging Business Landscapes. Palgrave MacMillan, HoundmillsCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Messner W, Schäfer N (2012) The ICCA™ facilitator’s manual. Intercultural communication and collaboration appraisal. Createspace, LondonGoogle Scholar
  17. Meyer JP, Allen NJ (1991) A three-component conceptualization of organizational commitment. Hum Resour Manage Rev 1:61–89CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Raghavan A (2008) Going global and taking charge: the road ahead for the Indian manager. Vikalpa 33(4):61–68MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  19. Schäfer N (2011) Diagnose und Entwicklung von Schlüsselqualifikationen für Führungskräfte. Das Diagnoseinstrument Q-Sort-Appraisal. Verlag Wissenschaft & Praxis, SternenfelsGoogle Scholar
  20. Spitzberg BH (1993) A model of intercultural communication competence. In: Samovar LA, Porter RE (eds) Intercultural communication: a reader. Wadsworth Publishing, Boston, MAGoogle Scholar
  21. Stephenson W (1935) Correlation persons instead of tests. Character Pers 4:17–24Google Scholar
  22. Stephenson W (1953) The study of behaviour: Q-technique and its methodology. University of Chicago Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  23. Trompenaars F, Hampden-Turner F (1997) Riding the waves of culture: understanding cultural diversity in global business. McGraw-Hill, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  24. Walker D, Walker T, Schmitz J (2004) Doing business internationally. Tata McGraw-Hill, New DelhiGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.GloBus ResearchLondonUK
  2. 2.University of Applied Sciences LudwigsburgLudwigsburgGermany

Personalised recommendations