Monitoring Cloud Coverage in Cyprus for Solar Irradiance Prediction

  • R. Tapakis
  • A. G. CharalambidesEmail author
Conference paper
Part of the Springer Atmospheric Sciences book series (SPRINGERATMO)


The penetration and acceptance of Renewable Energy Sources has already taken place in our lives. Solar Energy is the feedstock for various applications of Renewable Energy Systems (RES), thus, the knowledge of the intensity of the incident solar irradiance is essential for monitoring the performance of such systems. The only unpredictable factor in defining the solar irradiance and the performance of the systems is clouds. So far, various researchers proposed several models for the estimation of solar irradiance in correlation to cloud coverage and cloud type. The present work describes the development of a simple method for cloud detection and computation of short-term cloud motion using a Nikon D3100 camera with a 18–55 mm VR lens, positioned on a tripod in Limassol, Cyprus. The method used for distinguishing clouds from the sky is the “Red-Blue threshold”. Additionally, the results of the cloud distinction are used to calculate the future position of clouds. The developed methodology will provide a useful tool for researchers that want to focus on the effect of small local clouds on the energy production of their solar RES. The maximum error in our model was 12% for the prediction of the cloud location eight time steps in advance with only two cloud images processed.


Solar Irradiance Total Solar Irradiance Schedule Time Interval Cloud Detection Renewable Energy System 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. Ahmad MJ, Tiwari GN (2011) Solar radiation models – a review. Int J Energy Res 35:271–290. doi: 10.1002/er.1690 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. El Chaar L, Lamont LA, El Zein N (2011) Review of photovoltaic technologies. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 15:2165–2175. doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2011.01.004 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Heinle A, Macke A, Srivastav A (2010) Automatic cloud classification of whole sky images. Atmos Meas Tech 3:557–567. doi: 10.5194/amt-3-557-2010 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Kasten F, Czeplak G (1980) Solar and terrestrial radiation dependent on the amount and type of cloud. Sol Energy 24:177–189. doi: 10.1016/0038-092X(80)90391-6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Koren I, Altaratz O, Feingold G, Levin Z, Reisin T (2009) Cloud’s center of gravity – a compact approach to analyze convective cloud development. Atmos Chem Phys 9:155–161CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Long CN, Sabburg J, Calbó J, Pagès D (2006) Retrieving cloud characteristics from ground-based daytime color all-sky images. J Atmos Ocean Tech 23:633–652. doi: 10.1175/JTECH 1875.1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Pfister G, McKenzie RL, Liley JB, Thomas A, Forgan BW, Long CN (2003) Cloud coverage based on all-sky imaging and its impact on surface solar irradiance. J Appl Meteorol 42:1421–1434. doi:10.1175/1520-0450(2003) 042<1421:CCBOAI>2.0.CO;2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Roy G, Hayman S, Julian W (2001) Sky analysis from CCD images: cloud cover. Lighting Res Technol 33:211–222. doi: 10.1177/136578280103300402 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Thirugnanasambandam M, Iniyan S, Goic R (2010) A review of solar thermal technologies. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 14:312–322. doi: 10.1016/rser: 2009.07.014CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Zhou L, Kambhamettu C, Goldgof DB, Palaniappan K, Hasler AF (2001) Tracking nonrigid motion and structure from 2D satellite cloud images without correspondences. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal 23:1–7. doi: 10.1109/34.969121 Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Environmental Science and TechnologyCyprus University of TechnologyLemesosCyprus

Personalised recommendations