Advertisement

Using Social Network Analysis and Derivatives to Develop the S-BPM Approach and Community of Practice

  • James E. Weber
  • Werner Schmidt
  • Paula S. Weber
Part of the Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing book series (LNBIP, volume 104)

Abstract

Subject-Oriented Business Process Management (S-BPM) and Social Network Analysis (SNA) are emerging as valuable process improvement techniques within the broader field of Business Process Management (BPM). S-BPM focuses on how subjects perform actions on objects and on how they exchange messages in order to coordinate their process work. SNA and its derivatives look at the interrelationships between actors or nodes within a social network. The use of SNA to complement process improvement techniques is a new approach for BPM, but the focus thus far has been primarily within and between organizations. This paper proposes that SNA can be usefully engaged in the examination of interrelationships in the developing field of S-BPM and that SNA techniques can also help further develop the S-BPM approach. Potential benefits and directions for future research on the use of SNA within the community of practice and field of S-BPM are discussed.

Keywords

social networking analysis (SNA) subject-oriented business process management (S-BPM) development of the field of S-BPM community of practice in S-BPM S-BPM implementation S-BPM research value network analysis (VNA) organizational network analysis (ONA) value network model 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Metasonic, http://www.metasonic.de/en/whats-s-bpm (last access on October 19, 2011)
  2. 2.
    Dixon, J., Jones, T.: Hype Cycle for Business Process Management, 2011. White Paper, Gartner, Inc. (2011)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Olding, E., Rozwell, C.: Social Networking Analysis for BPM. In: Dixon, J., Jones, T. (eds.) Hype Cycle for Business Process Management, 2011. White Paper, pp. 23–24. Gartner, Inc. (2011)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Schmidt, W., Fleischmann, A., Gilbert, O.: Subjektorientiertes Geschäftsprozess-management, HMD – Praxis der Wirtschaftsinformatik, Heft 266, pp. 52–62 (2009)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Fleischmann, A., Schmidt, W., Stary, C., Obermeier, S., Börger, E.: Subjektorientiertes Prozessmanagement: Mitarbeiter einbinden. Motivation und Prozessakzeptanz steigern, Munich (2011)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Fleischmann, A., Stary, C.: Whom to talk to? A stakeholder perspective on business process development. Universal Access in the Information Society, 1–26 (June 2011), doi: 10.1007/s10209-011-0236-xGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
  8. 8.
    Scott, J.: Social network Analysis. Sage Publications, Los Angeles (2009)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Manski, C.F.: Economic Analysis of Social Interactions. Journal of Economic Perspectives 14(3), 115–136 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kilduff, M., Tsai, W.: Social Networks and Organizations. Sage Publications, Los Angeles (2007)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Stary, C., Fleischmann, A.: Evidence-based Interactive Management of Change. Knowledge Management & E-Learning: An International Journal 2(1), 17 (2011)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Wellman, B., Berkowitz, S.D. (eds.): Social Structures: A Network Approach. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1988)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Dunbar, R.I.M.: Neocortex Size as a Constraint on Group Size in Primates. Journal of Human Evolution 22(6), 469–493 (1992)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Fleischmann, A., Lippe, S., Meyer, N., Stary, C.: Coherent Task Modeling and Execution Based on Subject-Oriented Representations. In: England, D., Palanque, P., Vanderdonckt, J., Wild, P.J. (eds.) TAMODIA 2009. LNCS, vol. 5963, pp. 78–91. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Buchwald, H., Fleischmann, A., Seese, D., Stary, C. (eds.): S-BPM ONE 2009. CCIS, vol. 85. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Fleischmann, A., Schmidt, W., Singer, R., Seese, D. (eds.): S-BPM ONE 2010. CCIS, vol. 138. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Schmidt, W. (ed.): S-BPM ONE 2011. CCIS, vol. 213. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Fleischmann, A., Stary, C.: Key Features of Subject-Oriented Modeling and Organizational Deployment Tools. In: Stephanidis, C. (ed.) HCII 2011 and UAHCI 2011, Part IV. LNCS, vol. 6768, pp. 205–214. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Buchwald, H., Fleischmann, A., Seese, D., Stary, C.: Foreword. In: Buchwald, H., Fleischmann, A., Seese, D., Stary, C. (eds.) S-BPM ONE. CCIS, vol. 85, pp. V-VII. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Buchwald, H.: Potential Building Blocks of S-BPM. In: Buchwald, H., Fleischmann, A., Seese, D., Stary, C. (eds.) S-BPM ONE 2009. CCIS, vol. 85, pp. 123–135. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Schmidt, W., Stary, C.: Establishing an Informed S-BPM Community. In: Buchwald, H., Fleischmann, A., Seese, D., Stary, C. (eds.) S-BPM ONE 2009. CCIS, vol. 85, pp. 34–47. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Granovetter, M.S.: The Strength of Weak Ties. The American Journal of Sociology 78(6), 1360–1380 (1973)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Allee, V., Schwabe, O.: Value Networks and the true nature of collaboration, http://www.valuenetworksandcollaboration.com/ (last access on October 19, 2011)

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • James E. Weber
    • 1
  • Werner Schmidt
    • 2
  • Paula S. Weber
    • 1
  1. 1.St. Cloud State UniversitySt. CloudUSA
  2. 2.University of Applied Sciences IngolstadtIngolstadtGermany

Personalised recommendations