Advertisement

A Framework to Analyze the Reduction Potential of Life Cycle Carbon Dioxide Emissions of Passenger Cars

  • Christoph Herrmann
  • Karsten Kieckhäfer
  • Mark Mennenga
  • Steven Skerlos
  • Thomas Stefan Spengler
  • Julian Stehr
  • Vineet Raichur
  • Grit Walther

Abstract

Automobile manufacturers are increasingly obligated to reduce the greenhouse gas emissions of their vehicle fleets. In this paper a framework to analyze the reduction potential of the life cycle CO2 emissions of passenger cars is developed. It comprises nine sub-modules - including macroeconomic and microeconomic oriented modules. For each module relevant elements to be considered are presented. Within a short case study the framework is applied to analyze the reduction potential of the CO2 emissions of passenger cars. The achieved results are discussed with respect to different technical and policy measures available in the US and German market.

Keywords

(Alternative) Powertrains Holistic Assessment Vehicle Emissions Assessment Framework 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    UNFCCC: Greenhouse Gas Inventory Data (2011), http://unfccc.int/ghg_data/items/3800.php
  2. 2.
    UBA: Klimaschutz in Deutschland (2007), http://www.umweltdaten.de/publikationen/fpdf-l/3235.pdf
  3. 3.
    EU: Roadmap for moving to a low-carbon economy in 2050 (2011), http://ec.europa.eu/clima/policies/roadmap/index_en.htm
  4. 4.
    EU: Reducing CO 2 emissions from passenger cars (2010), http://ec.europa.eu/clima/policies/transport/vehicles/cars_en.htm
  5. 5.
    NHTSA: CAFE - Fuel Economy (2011), http://www.nhtsa.gov/fuel-economy
  6. 6.
    The Boston Consulting Group: Powering Autos to 2020: The Era of the Electric Car? Boston (2011)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    TNO: Review and analysis of the reduction potential and costs of technological and other measures to reduce CO 2-emissions from passenger car, Delft (2006)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    De Haan, P., Mueller, M.G., Scholz, R.W.: How much do incentives affect car purchase? Agent-based microsimulation of consumer choice of new cars: Part II: Forecasting ef-fects of fee-bates based on energy-efficiency. Energy Policy 37(3), 1083–1094 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Walther, G., Wansart, J., Kieckhaefer, K., Schnieder, E., Spengler, T.: Impact assessment in the automotive industry: mandatory market introduction of alternative power-train technologies. System Dynamics Review 26(3), 239–261 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Whitefoot, K.S., Grimes-Casey, H.G., Girata, C.E., Morrow, W.R., Winebracke, J.J., Keoleian, G.A., Skerlos, S.J.: Consequential Life Cycle Assessment With Market-Driven Design. Journal of Industrial Ecology 15(5), 726–742 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Struben, J., Sterman, J.D.: Transition challenges for alternative fuel vehicle and transportation systems. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design 35(6), 1070–1097 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Frischknecht, B.D., Whitefoot, K., Papalambros, P.Y.: On the Suitability of Econometric Demand Models in Design for Market Systems. Journal of Mechanical Design 132(12) (2010)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Kieckhäfer, K., Volling, T., Spengler, T.S.: Supporting Strategic Product Portfolio Planning. In: Diamantopoulos, A., et al. (eds.) Quantitative Marketing: and Marketing Management (2012) (to be published)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Mock, P.: Entwicklung eines Szenariomodells zur Simulation der zukünftigen Marktanteile und CO 2 Emissionen von Kraftfahrzeugen, VECTOR 21 (2011)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    KBA: Fahrzeuge, http://www.kba.de
  16. 16.
    Nationale Plattform Elektromobilität. Zweiter Bericht der Nationalen Plattform Elektromobilität, Berlin (2011)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Umweltbundesamt: Klimaänderungen. Treibhauseffekt – Eine globale Herausforderung. Indikator: CO 2-Emissionen nach Quellkategorien (2011a), http://www.umweltbundesamt-daten-zur-umwelt.de/umweltdaten/public/theme.do?nodeIdent=2842
  18. 18.
    Fraunhofer ISI: Forschungsergebnisse Verkehrsszenarien Fahrzeugflotten, http://isi.fraunhofer.de/elektromobilitaet/Fahrzeugflotten
  19. 19.
    Schlesinger, G., Hofer, P., Kirchner, A., Piégsa, A., Strassburg, S.:: Energieszenarien, Projekt Nr. 12/10 des Bundesministeriums für Wirtschaft und Technologie (2011), http://www.prognos.com/fileadmin/pdf/publikationsdatenbank/11_08_12_Energieszenarien_2011.pdf
  20. 20.
    Umweltbundesamt: Energie. CO 2-Emissionen des deutschen Strommix 2009 und Schätzung für (2011b), http://www.umweltbundesamt.de/energie/
  21. 21.
    United States Climate Action Partnership: A Blueprint for Legislative Action (January 2009)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    U.S. DOE: Transportation Energy Data Book, ch. 8, Household Vehicles and Characteristics (June 2011)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration: National Household Travel Survey (2009)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    U.S. DOE: Alternative Fuels and Advanced Vehicle Data Center. Trend in the number and types of light-duty vehicles being sold in the U.S. from 1975-2010 (2010)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    U.S. EPA: Inventory of U.S. Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Sinks: 1990-2009 (April 2011)Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Cheah, L., Heywood, J., Kirchain, R.: The energy impact of U.S. passenger vehicle fuel economy standards. In: IEEE International Symposium on Sustainable Systems and Technology (ISSST), Arlington (2010)Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    U.S. EPA: Greenhouse Gas Emissions from a Typical Passenger Vehicle (2005)Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    U.S. EPA: Light-Duty Automotive Technology, Carbon Dioxide Emissions, and Fuel Economy Trends: 1975 through 2010 (2010)Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    U.S. EIA: Electric Power Annual 2011 (November 2011)Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Shiau, C.N., Samaras, C., Hauffe, R., Michalek, J.J.: Impact of battery weight and charging patterns on the economic andenvironmental benefits of plug-in hybrid vehicles. Energy Policy 37, 2653–2663 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    U.S. EIA: Analysis of Senate Amendment 2028, the Climate Stewardship of 2003 (2004)Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Becker, T.A., Sidhu, I.: Electric Vehicles in United States a New Model with Forecasts to 2030, Berkeley (2009)Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Center for Automotive Research: The U.S. automotive Market and Industry in 2025 (2011)Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    J.D. Power and Associates: Light Vehicle Market - Long- Term View, Presentation (2010)Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    McKinsey: Averting the next energy crisis: The Demand Challenge (2009), http://www.mckinsey.com/mgi/reports/pdfs/next_energy_crisis/MGI_next_energy_crisis_full_report.pdf

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Christoph Herrmann
    • 1
  • Karsten Kieckhäfer
    • 2
  • Mark Mennenga
    • 1
  • Steven Skerlos
    • 3
  • Thomas Stefan Spengler
    • 2
  • Julian Stehr
    • 1
  • Vineet Raichur
    • 3
  • Grit Walther
    • 4
  1. 1.Product and Life Cycle Management Research Group, Institute of Machine Tools and Production TechnologyTechnische Universität BraunschweigBraunschweigGermany
  2. 2.Production and LogisticsTechnische Universität Braunschweig, Institute of Automotive Management and Industrial ProductionBraunschweigGermany
  3. 3.Department of Mechanical EngineeringThe University of MichiganAnn ArborUSA
  4. 4.Production and LogisticsBergische Universität Wuppertal Schumpeter School of Business and EconomicsWuppertalGermany

Personalised recommendations