A Review of Fauna Used in Zootherapeutic Remedies in Portugal: Historical Origins, Current Uses, and Implications for Conservation

Chapter

Abstract

Portugal has a very rich ethnozoological heritage due to its rich biodiversity, history, and culture. However, there are very few works dedicated to this, and little is known about the zootherapeutic remedies used in Portugal. Due to its location in a biodiversity hotspot, its agro-pastoralist traditions and also its role during the maritime discoveries of the Renaissance, Portugal has a long list of animals and animal parts that have been used in its folk medicine. These uses can still be found in many historical documents and pharmacopeias. Although these uses started to decline in the nineteenth century, many of them survived, being passed from generation to generation by oral tradition, and are still used by local populations. We can still find 225 remedies, using 54 animal species, mainly domestic animals and common species, in use in modern day Portugal. The use of some animals in traditional medicine, such as Lataste’s viper, the Iberian wolf, and the European pond turtle, can be an additional pressure on these already endangered species. Studies are much needed to better understand zootherapeutic uses in Portuguese folk medicine and their implications for conservation. This chapter intends to be a starting point to these future investigations.

References

  1. Álvares F (2004) O lobo o imaginário popular. In: Nunes M (ed) Serra da Aboboreira—a terra, o homem e os lobos. Câmara Municipal de Amarante, AmaranteGoogle Scholar
  2. Alves RRN, Rosa IL (2005) Why study the use of animal products in traditional medicines. J Ethnobiol Ethnomed doi: 10.1186/1746-4269-1-5
  3. Alves RRN, Rosa IL, Santana GG (2007) The role of animal-derived remedies as complementary medicine in Brazil. Bioscience 57(11):949–955CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Alves RRN, Vieira WLS, Santana GG (2008) Reptiles used in traditional folk medicine: conservation implications. Biodivers Conserv 17(8):2037–2049. doi:10.1007/s10531-007-9305-0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bethencourt F (1987) O Imaginário da Magia—feiticeiras, saludadores e nigromantes no séc, vol XVI. Universidade Aberta, LisbonGoogle Scholar
  6. Brigola JCP (2002) Colecções, Gabinetes e Museus em Portugal no Século XVIII. Fundação Calouste Gulbenkian/Fundação para a Ciência e Tecnologia, LisbonGoogle Scholar
  7. Brito JC, Rebelo A, Crespo EG (2001) Viper killings for superstitious reasons in Portugal. Boletin de la Asociacion Herpetologica Espñola 12:101–104Google Scholar
  8. Cabral MJ et al (2006) Livro vermelho dos vertebrados de Portugal. Assírio e Alvim, LisbonGoogle Scholar
  9. Campos A (1993) Víboras em saldo. Tal e Qual 21(05/93):17Google Scholar
  10. Ceríaco LMP (2010a) Gecko’s folklore in portuguese oral tradition. In: Conde SP (ed) Proceedings of the international conference on oral tradition, Concello de Ourense, OurenseGoogle Scholar
  11. Ceríaco LMP (2010b) Human attitudes towards herpetofauna. Dissertation, University of Évora, PortugalGoogle Scholar
  12. Ceríaco LMP, Marques MM, Madeira NC, Vila-Viçosa CMM, Mendes P (2011) Folklore and traditional ecological knowledge of Geckos in Southern Portugal: implications for conservation and science. J Ethnobiol Ethnomed 7(26):1–10. doi:10.1186/1746-4269-7-26 Google Scholar
  13. Coelho MR (1760) Pharmacopea tubalense. Officina Balio Geredini, RomeGoogle Scholar
  14. Cox N, Chanson J, Suart S (2006) The status and distribution of reptiles and amphibians of the Mediterranean Basin, 1st edn. IUCN, GlandCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. de Almeida AG, Magalhães M, Guimarães AP (2009) Artes de cura e espanta-males—Espólio de medicina popular recolhido por Michel Giacometti, 1st edn. Gradiva, LisbonGoogle Scholar
  16. Felgueiras G (1956) Os batráquios no conceito popular e na superstição. Acta do Primeiro Congresso de Etnografia e Folclore de Braga 2:65–92Google Scholar
  17. Ferreira JB (1935) O ofidismo no seu aspecto histórico e actual, 1st edn. Academia de Ciências de Lisboa, LisboaGoogle Scholar
  18. Fitzgerald LA, Painter CW, Reuter A, Hoover C (2004) Collection, trade, and regulation of reptiles and amphibians of the Chihuahuan Desert ecoregion. TRAFFIC North America World Wildlife Fundo, Washington D.CGoogle Scholar
  19. Fontes A, Sanches JG (2000) Medicina Popular—Ensaio de Antropologia Médica. Âncora Editora, LisbonGoogle Scholar
  20. Frazão-Moreira A, Fernandes MM (2006) Plantas e saberes. No limiar da etnobotânica em Portugal. Edições Colibri, LisbonGoogle Scholar
  21. Henriques FF (1731) Medicina Lusitana. Caza Miguel Diaz, AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
  22. Lev E (2002) Traditional healing with animals (zootherapy): medieval to present-day Levantine practice. J Ethnopharmacol 85:107–118CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Lobo E (1995) A doença e a cura: recorrência à bruxaria na procura de saúde, 1st edn. Estratégias Criativas Vila Nova de Gaia, PortugalGoogle Scholar
  24. Loureiro J (1790) Flora cochinchinensis. 1 edn. Typis, et Expensis Academicis, LisbonGoogle Scholar
  25. Mahawar M, Jaroli DP (2008) Traditional zootherapeutic studies in India: a review. J Ethnobiol Ethnomed 4(17):1–12. doi:10.1186/1746-4269-4-17 Google Scholar
  26. Mantero I (1998) Portugal Misterioso. Reader’s Digest, LisbonGoogle Scholar
  27. Marques JGW (1997) Fauna medicinal: Recurso do ambiente ou ameaça à biodiversidade. Mutum 1:1–4Google Scholar
  28. Myers N, Mittermeier RA, Mittermeier CG, da Fonseca GAB, Kent J (2000) Biodiversity hotspots for conservation priorities. Nature 403:858–858Google Scholar
  29. Nobre AF (1928) Animais venenosos de Portugal. Instituto de zoologia da Universidade do Porto, PortoGoogle Scholar
  30. Novais MH, Santos I, Mendes S, Pinto-Gomes C (2004) Studies on pharmaceutical ethnobotany in Arrabida Natural Park (Portugal). J Ethnopharmacol 93:183–195PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Quave CL, Lohani U, Verde A, Fajardo J, Rivera D, Obón C, Valdes A, Pieroni A (2010) A comparative assessment of zootherapeutic remedies from selected areas in Albania, Italy, Spain and Nepal. J Ethnobiol 30:92–125PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Ramstad KM, Nelson NJ, Paine G, Beech D, Paul A, Paul P, Allendorf FW, Daugherty CH (2007) Species and cultural conservation in New Zealand: Maori traditional ecological knowledge of Tuatara. Conserv Biol 21:455–464PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Salgueiro J (2010) Ervas, usos e saberes—Plantas medicinais no Alentejo e outros produtos naturais. Edições Colibri, LisboaGoogle Scholar
  34. Santo António C (1725) Pharmacopea Lusitana. Real Mosteiro de São Vicente de Fora, LisbonGoogle Scholar
  35. Singh JS (2002) The biodiversity crisis: a multifaceted review. Curr Sci 82:638–647Google Scholar
  36. Sutherland WJ (2003) Parallel extinction risk and global distribution of languages and people. Nature 423:276–279PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. WHO/IUCN/WWF (1993) Guidelines on conservation of medicinal plants. WHO/IUCN/WWF, GlandGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Centro de Estudos de História e Filosofia da Ciência (CEHFCi)Universidade de ÉvoraÉvoraPortugal

Personalised recommendations