Making Your Mind Up: Norms and Decisions

  • Philip Ball

Abstract

While the causes of the Arab Spring of 2011 are still disputed, no one imagines that the popular uprisings in Tunisia, Egypt and Libya happened one after the other by pure coincidence. Even before President Mubarak of Egypt was forced to relinquish his rule in February, there was talk of a ‘domino effect’ and ‘copycat’ behaviour across the North African nations, leading political leaders in Algeria, Morocco and Libya to lower the prices of essential goods in an attempt to avoid spreading of this ‘contagious’ unrest. Such knock-on effects of social disturbance and conflict were nothing new. For example, the civil war in Rwanda in the 1990s spread into the neighbouring Congo, at the cost of millions of lives, and also affected Burundi and Uganda.

Keywords

Domino Effect Moderate Opinion Mobile Phone Technology Social Disturbance Pure Coincidence 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Further Reading

  1. T. C. Schelling, Micromotives and Macrobehavior. W. W. Norton, New York, 1978.Google Scholar
  2. W. Weidlich, Sociodynamics: A Systematic Approach to Modelling the Social Sciences. Harwood, Academic, Amsterdam, 2000.MATHGoogle Scholar
  3. D. Stauffer, ‘Opinion dynamics and sociophysics’, in Encyclopedia of Complexity & System Science, ed. R. A. Meyers, 6380–6388. Springer, Heidelberg, 2009.Google Scholar
  4. S. Galam, ‘Opinion dynamics, minority spreading and heterogeneous beliefs’, in Econophysics and Sociophysics ed. B. K. Chakrabarti, A. Chakraborti, A. Chatterjee, pp.367–391. Wiley, Berlin, 2006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. G. Weisbuch, ‘Social opinion dynamics’, in Econophysics and Sociophysics ed. B. K. Chakrabarti, A. Chakraborti, A. Chatterjee, pp.339–366. Wiley, Berlin, 2006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. R. Axelrod, ‘The dissemination of culture: A model with local convergence and global polarization’, J. Conflict Resolut. 41, 203–26 (1997).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. F. Gargiulo & A. Mazzoni, ‘Can extremism guarantee pluralism?’, J. Artific. Societ. Soc. Simul. 11, http://jasss.soc.surrey.ac.uk/11/4/9.html (2008).Google Scholar
  8. G. Deffuant, F./ Amblard, G. Weisbuch & T. Faure, ‘How can extremism prevail? A study based on the relative agreement interaction model’, J. Artific. Societ. Soc. Simul. 5, http://jasss.soc.surrey.ac.uk/5/4/1.html (2002).Google Scholar
  9. S. Suo & Y. Chen, ‘The dynamics of public opinion in complex networks’, J. Artific. Societ. Soc. Simulat. 11, http://jasss.soc.surrey.ac.uk/11/4/2.html (2008).Google Scholar
  10. D. J. Watts & P. S. Dodds, ‘Networks, influence, and public opinion formation’, J. Consumer Res. 34, 441–458 (2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. M. J. Salganik, P. S. Dodds & D. J. Watts, ‘Experimental study of inequality and unpredictability in an artificial cultural market’, Science 311, 854–856 (2006).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. M. Mäs, A. Flache & D. Helbing, ‘Individualization as driving force of clustering phenomena in humans’, PLoS Comput. Biol. 6, e1000959 (2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Philip Ball
    • 1
  1. 1.LondonUK

Personalised recommendations