Optimizing a Highly Flexible Shoe Production Plant Using Simulation

Abstract

This paper explores the use of simulation for the optimization of highly flexible production plants. Basis for this work is a model of a real shoe production plant that produces up to 13 different styles concurrently, resulting in maximum 11 different production sequences. The flexibility of the plant is ensured by organizing the process in a sequence of so-called work islands, using trolleys to move shoes between them. Depending on production needs one third of the operators are reallocated. The model considers the full complexity of allocation rules, assembly flows and production mix. Analyses were performed by running use cases, from very simple (providing an insight in basic dynamics) up to complex (supporting the identification of interaction effects and validation against reality). Analysis gave insight in bottlenecks and dependencies between parameters. Experiences gained distilled in guidelines on how simulation can support the improvement of highly flexibly organized production plants.

Keywords

Production Plant Batch Size Assembly Area Sustainable Innovation Labor Allocation 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Baiens, T., Hadfield, L., Mason, S., Ladbrook, J.: Using empirical evidence of variations in worker performance to extend the capabilities of discrete event simulations in manufacturing. In: Proceedings of the 2003 Winter Simulation Conference, pp. 1210–1216 (2003)Google Scholar
  2. Boër, C.R., Avai, A., El-Chaar, J., Imperio, E.: Computer Simulation for the Design and Planning of Flexible Assembly Systems. In: Proceedings of International Workshop on Application and Development of Modelling and Simulation of Manufacturing Systems (1993)Google Scholar
  3. Chung, C.A.: Simulation modelling handbook. Crc Press, Beijing (2004)Google Scholar
  4. Kelton, W.D., Sadowski, R.P., Sturrock, D.T.: Simulation with Arena, 3rd edn. WCB/McGraw-Hill, New York (2003)Google Scholar
  5. Merkureyeva, G.: Metamodelling for simulating applications in production and logistics, http://www.sim-serv.com (accessed June 16, 2008)
  6. Merkureyeva, G., Brezhinska, S., Brezhinskis, J.: Response surface-based simulation metamodelling methods, http://www.simserv.com (accessed June 16, 2008)
  7. Roser, C., Nakano, M., Tanaka, M.: Buffer allocation model based on a single simulation. In: Proceedings of the 2003 Winter Simulation Conference, pp. 1230–1246 (2003)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.HUGO BOSS Ticino SAColdrerioSwitzerland
  2. 2.Technology Transfer SystemMilanoItaly
  3. 3.CIM Institute for Sustainable InnovationLuganoSwitzerland

Personalised recommendations