The “Good” Brother: Monitoring People Activity in Private Spaces

  • Jose R. Padilla-López
  • Francisco Flórez-Revuelta
  • Dorothy N. Monekosso
  • Paolo Remagnino
Part of the Advances in Intelligent and Soft Computing book series (AINSC, volume 151)

Abstract

Population over 50 will rise by 35% until 2050. Thus, attention to the needs of the elderly and disabled is today in all developed countries one of the great challenges of social and economic policies. There is a worldwide interest in systems for the analysis of people’s activities, especially those most in need.

Vision systems for surveillance and behaviour analysis have spread in recent years. While cameras are widely used in outdoor environments there are few employed in private spaces, being replaced by other devices that provide fewer information. This is mainly due to people worries about maintaining privacy and their feeling of being continuously monitored by “big brother”.

We propose a methodology for the design of a multisensor network in private spaces that meets privacy requirements. People would accept video-based surveillance and safety services if the system can ensure their privacy under any circumstance, as a kind of “good brother”.

Keywords

Behaviour Analysis Privacy Preservation Ambient Intelligence Private Space Fall Detection 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    European Commission: Overview of the European strategy in ICT for Ageing Well (2009)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    European Commission: Seniorwatch 2. Assessment of the Senior Market for ICT Progress and Developments (2008)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    European Science and Technology Observatory: Science and Technology Roadmapping: Ambient Intelligence in Everyday Life (AmI@Life). In: Friedewald, M., Da Costa, O. (eds.) JRC/IPTS-ESTO Study (2003)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Remagnino, P., Foresti, G., Ellis, Y. (eds.): Ambient Intelligence: a Novel Paradigm. Springer, New York (2005)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Steinhage, A., Lauterbach, C.: Monitoring movement behaviour by means of a large area proximity sensor array in the floor. In: Gottfried, B., Aghajan, H.K. (eds.) Proceedings of the 2nd Workshop on Behaviour Monitoring and Interpretation, BMI 2008, pp. 15–27. CEUR-WS.org (2008)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Tapia, E.M., Intille, S.S., Larson, K.: Activity Recognition in the Home Using Simple and Ubiquitous Sensors. In: Ferscha, A., Mattern, F. (eds.) PERVASIVE 2004. LNCS, vol. 3001, pp. 158–175. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Mihailidis, A., Carmichael, B., Boger, J.: The use of computer vision in an intelligent environment to support aging-in-place, safety, and independence in the home. IEEE Transactions on Information Technology in Biomedicine 8(3), 238–247 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Park, S., Kautz, H.: Hierarchical Recognition of Activities of Daily Living using Multi-Scale, Multi-Perspective Vision and RFID. In: 4th IET International Conference on Intelligent Environments, Seattle (2008)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Hoey, J., Poupart, P., Bertoldi, A., Craig, T., Boutilier, C., Mihailidis, A.: Automated handwashing assistance for persons with dementia using video and a partially observable Markov decision process. Computer Vision and Image Understanding 114(5), 503–519 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    European Commission: ICT & Ageing. European Study on Users, Markets and Technologies. Final Report (2010)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Velastin, S., Remagnino, P. (eds.): Intelligent distributed video surveillance systems. IEE (2006)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Moeslund, T., Hilton, A., Kruger, V.: A survey of advances in vision-based human motion capture and analysis. Computer Vision and Image Understanding 104, 90–126 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Ferryman, J.M. (ed.): Proceedings of PETS 2007. IEEE Computer Society (2007)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Shah, M., Javed, O., Shafique, K.: Automated Visual Surveillance in Realistic Scenarios. IEEE Multimedia 14(1), 30–39 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Tian, Y.-L., Brown, L.M.G., Hampapur, A., Lu, M., Senior, A.W., Shu, C.-F.: IBM smart surveillance system (S3): event based video surveillance system with an open and extensible framework. Machine Vision and Applications 19(5-6), 315–327 (2008)MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Dufaux, F., Ebrahimi, T.: Scrambling for Privacy Protection in Video Surveillance Systems. IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology 18(8), 1168–1174 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Winkler, T., Rinner, B.: TrustCAM: Security and Privacy-Protection for an Embedded Smart Camera Based on Trusted Computing. In: Proceedings of the 7th IEEE International Conference on Advanced Video and Signal Based Surveillance, pp. 593–600. IEEE (2010)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Privacy enablement in a surveillance system. In: Senior, A. (ed.) Proceedings of the 15th IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision, pp. 1680–1683. IEEE (2008)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Neustaedter, C., Greenberg, S., Boyle, M.: Blur Filtration Fails to Preserve Privacy for Home-Based Video Conferencing. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction 13(1), 1–36 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Zhou, Z., Chen, X., Chung, Y.-C., He, Z., Han, T.X., Keller, J.M.: Activity Analysis, Summarization, and Visualization for Indoor Human Activity Monitoring. IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology 18(11), 1489–1498 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Zouba, N., Bremond, F., Thonnat, M., Anfosso, A., Pascual, É., Malléa, P., Mailland, V., Guerin, O.: A computer system to monitor older adults at home: Preliminary results. Gerontechnology 8(3), 129–139 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Cucchiara, R., Prati, A., Vezzani, R.: A Multi-Camera Vision System for Fall Detection and Alarm Generation. Expert Systems 24(5), 334–345 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Crowley, J.L., Coutaz, J., Bérard, F.: Perceptual user interfaces: things that see. Communications of the ACM 43(3), 54–64 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    McIvor, A.: Background Subtraction Techniques. In: Proc. of Image and Vision Computing, New Zealand, Auckland (2000)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Poppe, A.: A survey on vision-based human action recognition. Image and Vision Computing 28(6), 976–990 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jose R. Padilla-López
    • 1
  • Francisco Flórez-Revuelta
    • 1
  • Dorothy N. Monekosso
    • 2
  • Paolo Remagnino
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Computing TechnologyUniversity of AlicanteAlicanteSpain
  2. 2.School of Computing and MathematicsUniversity of UlsterJordanstownUK
  3. 3.Faculty of Science, Engineering and ComputingKingston UniversitySurreyUnited Kingdom

Personalised recommendations