Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy (PNL)

Chapter

Abstract

Percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PNL) is a gold standard for the management of stones in the kidney. PNL offers good clearance rates with minimal morbidity. The key to success in a PNL includes proper patient selection and technique. The factors to be considered while selecting the patient for PNL include the stone size, location, and the pelvicalyceal anatomy. In this chapter, we discuss the indications and the technique of PNL. PNL offers good clearance rates with minimal morbidity with proper patient selection and technique. The current indications for PNL include stone size larger than 2 cm, staghorn calculi and multiple complex calculi, lower polar stones larger than 1 cm, stones in calyceal diverticula, and stones in horseshoe kidney, malrotated, pelvic kidneys. A perfect percutaneous renal access is “key” to success. The choice of access may be fluoroscopic or ultrasound-guided. PNL in patients with chronic kidney disease requires strategic preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative planning.

Keywords

Chronic Kidney Disease Guide Wire Horseshoe Kidney Residual Stone Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Al Kandari AM, Jabbour M, Anderson A et al (2007) Comparative study of degree of renal trauma between amplatz sequential fascial dilatation and balloon dilatation during percutaneous renal surgery in a animal model. Urology 69:586–589CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Auge BK, Lallas CD, Pietrow PK et al (2002) In vitro comparison of standard ultrasound and pneumatic lithotrites with a new combination intracorporeal lithotripsy device. Urology 60(1):28–32PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. De la Rosette J, Assimos D, Desai M, CROES PCNL Study Group et al (2011) The clinical research office of the endourological society percutaneous nephrolithotomy global study: indications, complications, and outcomes in 5,803 patients. J Endourol 25(1):11–17PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Denstedt J, Khoury S (eds) (2008) Stone disease. In: 2nd international consultation on stone disease, edn 2008. Health Publications, Paris, pp 157–164Google Scholar
  5. Denstedt JD, Clayman RV, Picus DD (1991) Comparison of endoscopic and radiological residual fragment rate following percutaneous nephrolithotripsy. J Urol 145(4):703–705PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Desai M, Kukreja R, Desai M et al (2004) A prospective randomised comparison of type of nephrostomy drainage following percutaneous nephrostomy: large bore versus small bore versus tubeless. J Urol 172:565–567PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Fernstorm I, Johansson B (1976) Percutaneous pyelolithotomy: a new extraction technique. Scand J Urol Nephrol 10:257–259Google Scholar
  8. Frattini A, Barbieri A, Salsi P et al (2001) One shot: a novel method to dilate the nephrostomy access for percutaneous lithotripsy. J Endourol 15:919–923PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Halebian GE, Sur RL, Albala DM et al (2007) Subcutaneous bupivacaine infiltration and postoperative pain perception after PCNL. J Urol 178:925–928CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Kukreja R, Desai M, Patel S et al (2004) Factors affecting blood loss during percutaneous nephrolithotomy. A prospective study. J Endourol 18(8):715–722PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Paul EM, Marcowich R, Lee B et al (2003) Choosing the ideal nephrostomy tube. BJU Int 92:672–677PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Pearle MS, Watamull LM, Mullican MA (1999) Sensitivity of noncontrast helical computerized tomography and plain film radiography compared to flexible nephroscopy for detecting residual fragments after percutaneous nephrostolithotomy. J Urol 162(1):23–26PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Pietrow P, Auge B, Lallas C et al (2003) Pain after percutaneous nephrolithotomy: impact of nephrostomy tube size. J Endourol 17:411–414PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Shah VR, Modi MP, Chauhan NC et al (2011) The analgesic efficacy of peritubal infiltration of 0.25% bupivacaine in percutaneous nephrolithotomy – a prospective randomized study. J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol 27(4):481–484PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Ugras M, Ilksen H, Gunen H et al (2007) Instillation of skin, nephrostomy tract, and renal puncture site with ropivacaine decreases pain and improves ventilatory function after percutaneous nephrolithotomy. J Endourol 21:499–503PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of UrologyMuljibhai Patel Urological HospitalNadiadIndia

Personalised recommendations