A Multi-agent Strategy for Integration of Imprecise Descriptions
One of the fundamental challenges of distributed multi-agent systems relates to the problem of knowledge integration – where a collective stance of the distributed system needs to be determined and justified. Assuming a simple multi-agent system we present an intuitive and consistent approach to the integration of imprecise descriptions of individual beliefs about the external world. In particular, focusing our attention to simple modal statements of certainty, i.e., possibility, belief and knowledge, we state rational set of common-sense postulates against the integration results. Further, utilising the Grounding Theory, as the means for appropriate grounding of statements, and incorporating the approach with theory of mind, as the underlying mechanism for interpretation of statements, we introduce a two-stage integration procedure. Finally, we prove the appropriateness of the proposed solution, show its basic properties, and provide a simple computational example.
Keywordsknowledge integration consensus multi-agent system modal statements
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 1.Dennett, D.C.: True believers: The intentional strategy and why it works. In: Stich, S.P., Warfield, T.A. (eds.) Mental Representation: A Reader. Blackwell (1994)Google Scholar
- 5.Lakoff, G., Johnson, M.: Philosophy In The Flesh: the Embodied Mind and its Challenge to Western Thought. Basic Books (1999)Google Scholar
- 6.Katarzyniak, R.: Grounding Atom Formulas and Simple Modalities in Communicative Agents. Applied Informatics, 388–392 (2003)Google Scholar
- 7.Katarzyniak, R.: The Language Grounding Problem and its Relation to the Internal Structure of Cognitive Agents. J. UCS 11(2), 357–374 (2005)Google Scholar