Determining Car Driver Interaction Intent through Analysis of Behavior Patterns

  • Madalina-Ioana Toma
  • Dragos Datcu
Part of the IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology book series (IFIPAICT, volume 372)

Abstract

The aim of the article is to present preliminary results obtained by analysis of the behavior patterns of various driver subjects, in the context of an intelligent assistive driving system. We determined the parameters which are involved in determining the car driver’s interaction intent, and extracted features of interest from various measured parameters of the driver, car, and the environment. We discuss how threshold values can be obtained for the extracted features that can be part of rules to decide on specific interaction intents. The results obtained in this paper will be incorporated in a knowledge base to define the rules of an rule-based expert system that will predict in real-time the driver’s interaction intent, in order to enhance the safe driving experience.

Keywords

natural interaction intention intent virtual environments features extraction 

References

  1. 1.
    Laffey, T.J., Cox, P.A., Schmidt, J.A., Kao, S.M., Jackson, Y.: Read: Real-Time Knowledge-Based Systems. AI Magazine (1988)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Avci, E., Avci, D.: An expert system based on fuzzy entropy for automatic threshold selection in image processing. Journal of Expert Systems with Applications, 3077–3085 (2009)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Lefèvre, S., Ibanez-Guzman, J., Laugier, C.: Context-based Estimation of Driver Intent at Road Intersections 2011. In: IEEE Symposium on Computational Intelligence in Vehicles and Transportation Systems (2011)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Doshi, A., Morris, B., Trivedi, M.: On-Road Prediction of Driver’s Intent with Multimodal Sensory Cues. IEEE Pervasive Computing 10(3), 22–34 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Trivedi, M.M., et al.: Posture analysis with stereo and thermal infrared video: Algorithms and experimental evaluation. IEEE Trans. Vehicular Technology 53(6), 1698–1712 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    McCall, M.T.J., Mallick, S.: Real-time driver affect analysis and tele-viewing system. In: Proceedings of the Intelligent Vehicles Symposium, pp. 372–377. IEEE (2003)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Inagaki, T.: Smart collaborations between humans and machines based on mutual understanding. Annual Reviews in Control 32, 253–261 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Lorentzen, T., Kobayashi, Y., Ito, Y.: Virtual Reality Simulation: Integrating Infrastructure Plans, Traffic Models, and Driving Behaviors. In: Proceedings of the 16th World Congress on Intelligent Transportation Systems and Services (2009)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Ingebretsen, M.: In the News. IEEE Intelligent Systems 25(4), 4–8 (2010)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Shotton, J., Fitzgibbon, A., Cook, M., Blake, A.: Real-time Human Pose Recognition in Parts from Single Depth Images (2011)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Loiacono, J., Togelius, et al.: The wcci 2008 simulated car racing competition. In: Proceedings of the IEEE Symposium on Computational Intelligence and Games (2008)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
  13. 13.
    Microsoft SDK for Kinect, http://kinectforwindows.org/

Copyright information

© IFIP International Federation for Information Processing 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Madalina-Ioana Toma
    • 1
  • Dragos Datcu
    • 2
  1. 1.Product Design and Robotics DepartmentTransilvania University of BrasovRomania
  2. 2.Faculty of Military SciencesNetherlands Defence AcademyThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations