Non-intrusive System Control of FACTS

  • Xiao-Ping Zhang
  • Christian Rehtanz
  • Bikash Pal
Part of the Power Systems book series (POWSYS)

Abstract

For the implementation of FACTS-Devices, especially for controllable transmission paths in an AC-system, intensive planning studies and redesign of control and protection systems have to be executed. Adverse control interactions with other controllers and a lack of optimization potential due to predefined devices have to be considered. Applying a control architecture, which enables the operation of a new FACTS-device and especially a controlled transmission path without affecting the rest of the system, can eliminate these problems. This non-intrusiveness is the key issue of the so-called Non-Intrusive System Control (NISC) architecture. In this chapter the basic requirements and structure of this new control architecture are described first. A second focus is given to the problem of controller interactions in abnormal operation situations where the NISC architecture helps to avoid malfunctioning or adverse reactions.

Keywords

Power System Network Control System Transmission Path Ancillary Service Network Controller 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Larsen, E.V., Sunchez-Gasca, J.J.: Concepts for design of FACTS controllers to damp power swings. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems 10(2) (1995)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Povh, D., Haubrich, H.: Global settings of FACTS controllers in power systems. CIGRE Session Paper 14-305 (1996)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Glavitsch, H., Rahmani, M.: Increased transmission capacity by forced symmetrization. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems 13(1) (1998)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Esmeraldo, P.C.V., Gabaglia, C.P.R., Aleksandrov, G.N., Gerasimov, I.A., Evdokunin, G.N.: A proposed design for the new Furnas 500 kV transmission lines-the High Surge Impedance Loading Line. IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery 14(1), 278–286 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Brochu, J.: Interphase Power Controllers. Polytechnic International Press, Montreal (1999)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Ngamroo, I., Mitani, Y., Tsuji, K.: Robust load frequency control by solid-state phase shifter based on H∞ control design. In: IEEE PES Winter Meeting, vol. 1, pp. 725–730 (1999)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Taranto, G.N., Shiau, J.K., Chow, J.H., Othman, H.A.: Robust decentralized design for multiple FACTS damping controllers. IEEE Proceedings Generation, Transmission and Distribution 144(1), 61–67 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Wang, L., Tsai, M.H.: Design of a H∞ static VAr controller for the damping of generator oscillations. In: International Conference on Power System Technology, Proeedings of POWERCON 1998, vol. 2, pp. 785–789 (1998)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Ortega, R., Loria, A., Nicklasson, P.J., Sira-Ramirez, H.: Passivity-based Control of Euler-Lagrange Systems. Springer, Netherlands (1998)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Andersson, G., Ghandari, M., Hiskens, I.A.: Control Lyapunov Functions for controlled series devices. In: VII SEPOPE, Curitiba, Brazil (2000)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Bulliger, E., Allgöwer, F.: Adaptive λ-tracking for nonlinear systems with higher relative degree. In: Proceedings of the Conference on Decision and Control 2000, Sydney, Australia (2000)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Xiao-Ping Zhang
    • 1
  • Christian Rehtanz
    • 2
  • Bikash Pal
    • 3
  1. 1.University of BirminghamBirminghamUK
  2. 2.TU Dortmund UniversityDortmundGermany
  3. 3.Imperial College LondonLondonUK

Personalised recommendations