Advertisement

Configurable Process Models for Logistics Case Study for Customs Clearance Processes

  • Wassim Derguech
  • Feng Gao
  • Sami Bhiri
Part of the Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing book series (LNBIP, volume 100)

Abstract

Configuration based modelling is one of the reuse oriented modelling techniques that allows for exploiting proven best practices in business processes management. This paper is a case study of the use of configurable process models in logistics. It analysis and creates a set of process models for customs clearance services for import and export processes and delivers the configurable process model out of these models. The paper discusses main challenges for the use of configurable process models in such domain and draws some future work.

Keywords

business process modeling reuse merging configuration logistics 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Gottschalk, F.: Configurable Process Models. PhD thesis, Eindhoven University of Technology, Eindhoven, Netherlands (December 2009)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    La Rosa, M.: Managing Variability in Process-Aware Information Systems. PhD thesis, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Australia (April 2009)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Rosemann, M., van der Aalst, W.M.P.: A configurable reference modelling language. Inf. Syst. 32(1), 1–23 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Derguech, W., Bhiri, S.: Merging Business Process Variants. In: Abramowicz, W. (ed.) BIS 2011. LNBIP, vol. 87, pp. 86–97. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Gottschalk, F., Wagemakers, T.A.C., Jansen-Vullers, M.H., van der Aalst, W.M.P., La Rosa, M.: Configurable Process Models: Experiences from a Municipality Case Study. In: van Eck, P., Gordijn, J., Wieringa, R. (eds.) CAiSE 2009. LNCS, vol. 5565, pp. 486–500. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    La Rosa, M., Dumas, M.: Configurable Process Models: How To Adopt Standard Practices In Your How Way? BPTrends Newsletter (November 2008)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Mendling, J., Nüttgens, M.: EPC Syntax Validation with XML Schema Languages. In: EPK (2003)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Weber, B., Mendling, J., Reichert, M.: Flexibility in Process-Aware Information Systems (ProFlex) Workshop Report. In: WETICE. IEEE CS (2006)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    La Rosa, M., Dumas, M., Uba, R., Dijkman, R.: Merging Business Process Models. In: Meersman, R., Dillon, T.S., Herrero, P. (eds.) OTM 2010, Part I. LNCS, vol. 6426, pp. 96–113. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Gottschalk, F., van der Aalst, W.M.P., Jansen-Vullers, M.H.: Merging Event-Driven Process Chains. In: Meersman, R., Tari, Z. (eds.) OTM 2008, Part I. LNCS, vol. 5331, pp. 418–426. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Lu, R., Sadiq, S.: On the Discovery of Preferred Work Practice Through Business Process Variants. In: Parent, C., Schewe, K.-D., Storey, V.C., Thalheim, B. (eds.) ER 2007. LNCS, vol. 4801, pp. 165–180. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Markovic, I., Pereira, A.C.: Towards a Formal Framework for Reuse in Business Process Modeling. In: ter Hofstede, A.H.M., Benatallah, B., Paik, H.-Y. (eds.) BPM Workshops 2007. LNCS, vol. 4928, pp. 484–495. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Vulcu, G., Derguech, W., Bhiri, S.: Business Process Model Discovery Using Semantics. In: zur Muehlen, M., Su, J. (eds.) BPM 2010 Workshops LNBIP, vol. 66, pp. 326–337. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Hallerbach, A., Bauer, T., Reichert, M.: Context-based Configuration of Process Variants. In: TCoB (2008)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Hallerbach, A., Bauer, T., Reichert, M.: Managing Process Variants in the Process Life Cycle. In: Cordeiro, J., Filipe, J. (eds.) ICEIS, vol. (3-2) (2008)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Razavian, M., Khosravi, R.: Modeling Variability in Business Process Models Using UML. In: ITNG. IEEE Computer Society (2008)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Dreiling, A., Rosemann, M., van der Aalst, W.M.P., Sadiq, W., Khan, S.: Model-driven process configuration of enterprise systems. In: Wirtschaftsinformatik. Physica-Verlag (2005)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Lapouchnian, A., Yu, Y., Mylopoulos, J.: Requirements-Driven Design and Configuration Management of Business Processes. In: Alonso, G., Dadam, P., Rosemann, M. (eds.) BPM 2007. LNCS, vol. 4714, pp. 246–261. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    La Rosa, M., Lux, J., Seidel, S., Dumas, M., ter Hofstede, A.H.M.: Questionnaire-driven Configuration of Reference Process Models. In: Krogstie, J., Opdahl, A.L., Sindre, G. (eds.) CAiSE 2007 and WES 2007. LNCS, vol. 4495, pp. 424–438. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Gerth, C., Luckey, M., Küster, J.M., Engels, G.: Detection of semantically equivalent fragments for business process model change management. In: SCC (2010)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Küster, J.M., Gerth, C., Förster, A., Engels, G.: A Tool for Process Merging in Business-Driven Development. In: CAiSE Forum, vol. 344, CEUR-WS.org (2008)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Wassim Derguech
    • 1
  • Feng Gao
    • 1
  • Sami Bhiri
    • 1
  1. 1.Galway Digital Enterprise Research InstituteNational University of IrelandIreland

Personalised recommendations