Is Moodle Accessible for Visually Impaired People?

  • Rocío Calvo
  • Ana Iglesias
  • Lourdes Moreno
Part of the Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing book series (LNBIP, volume 101)

Abstract

Most educational centers are currently using e-learning tools to provide the pedagogical resources for the students, especially in higher education. Nevertheless, some students are not able to access to this information because these authoring tools are not as accessible as they should be. The main aim of this paper is to evaluate if one of the most widely e-learning tool used around the world, Moodle, is accessible for visually impaired people. The evaluation shows that the accessibility guidelines provided by the World Wide Web Consortium (W3C) are not accomplished by the tool. Moreover, it shows that people using screen readers are not able to access to the majority of the functionality of Moodle.

Keywords

e-Learning Moodle Accessibility Visual impairments Screen reader 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Cook, A.M., Polgar, J.M.: Assistive Technologies: Principles and Practice, 3rd edn., Saint Louis, MO Mosby (2007)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Moreno, L., Iglesias, A., Calvo, R., Delgado, S., Zaragoza, L.: Higher Education Institutions and Learning Management Systems: Adoption and Standardization. In: Disability Standards and Guidelines for Learning Management Systems: Evaluating Accessibility. IGI Global (2010)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Caniëls, M.C.J., Smeets-Verstraeten, A.H.J., van den Bosch, H.M.J.: LMS, LCMS, and e-Learning Environments Where Did the Didactics Go? In: The Challenges of Educating People to Lead in a Challenging World, pp. 401–421. Springer, Netherlands (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Holmes, B., Gardner, J.: E-learning: concepts and practice, 1st edn. SAGE, London (2006)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Harman, K., Koohang, A.: Learning objects: standards, metadata, repositories & LCMS. Informing Science Press (2006)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    W3C, WAI, Web Content Accessibility Guidelines 2.0, WCAG 2.0 (2008), http://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG10/
  7. 7.
    W3C, WAI, Authoring Tool Accessibility Guidelines 2.0, ATAG 2.0 (2010), http://www.w3.org/TR/2010/WD-ATAG20-20100708/
  8. 8.
    W3C, WAI, User Agent Accessibility Guidelines 1.0, UAAG 1.0 (2002), http://www.w3.org/TR/WAI-USERAGENT
  9. 9.
    IMS Access For All v2.0 Final Specification, http://www.imsglobal.org/accessibility/
  10. 10.
    Universal Desing for learning UDL Guidelines 1.0 (2010), http://www.udlcenter.org/aboutudl/udlguidelines
  11. 11.
    Elias, T.: Universal Instructional Design Principles for Moodle. Canada International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning 11(2) (May 2010) ISSN: 1492-3831Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Fichten, C., Asunción, J., Barile, M., Ferraro, V.: Accessibility of e-Learning and Computer and Information Technologies for Students with Visual Impairments in Postsecondary Education. Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness 103(9), 543–557 (2009)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Fisseler, B., Bühler, C.: Accessible E-Learning and Educational Technology - Extending Learning Opportunities for People with Disabilities. In: Proceedings of the International Conference of “Interactive computer aided learning” ICL 2007: EPortofolio and Quality in e-Learning, Villach (Austria), September 26 -28, pp. 1–15 (2007)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Power, C., Petrie, H., Sakharov, V., Swallow, D.: Virtual Learning Environments: Another Barrier to Blended and E-Learning. In: Miesenberger, K., Klaus, J., Zagler, W., Karshmer, A. (eds.) ICCHP 2010. LNCS, vol. 6179, pp. 519–526. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
  16. 16.
    Buzzi, M.C., Buzzi, M., Leporini, B.: Accessing e-Learning Systems via Screen Reader: An Example. In: Jacko, J.A. (ed.) HCI International 2009, Part IV. LNCS, vol. 5613, pp. 21–30. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Babu, R., Singh, R., Ganesh, J.: Understanding Blind Users’ Web Accessibility and Usability Problems. Transactions on Human Computer Interaction 2(3), 73 (2010)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Iglesias, A., Moreno, L., Martínez, P., Calvo-Martin, R.: Evaluating the accessibility of three open-source learning content management systems: a comparative study. Computer Applications in Engineering Education (June 2011) Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Rocío Calvo
    • 1
  • Ana Iglesias
    • 1
  • Lourdes Moreno
    • 1
  1. 1.Computer DepartmentUC3M UniversityLeganésSpain

Personalised recommendations