Transgovernance: The Quest for Governance of Sustainable Development

  • Roeland Jaap in ’t Veld


In this chapter, the Summary and Recommendations are included of the first report of the TransGov project of IASS, Potsdam, authored by Roeland J. in ’t Veld. For this report the contributions to this volume were used as source of inspiration.


Sustainable Development Precautionary Principle Governance Arrangement Wicked Problem Representative Democracy 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Open Access.

This chapter is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.


  1. Bachmann G (2012) Emergency response – clustering change. In: Meuleman L (ed) Transgovernance: advancing sustainability governance. Springer, HeidelbergGoogle Scholar
  2. Basten F (2010) Researching publics. In: In ’t Veld RJ (ed) Knowledge democracy: consequences for science, politics and media. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 73–85Google Scholar
  3. Beck U (1992) Risk society: towards a new modernity. Sage, LondonGoogle Scholar
  4. Beck U (1999) World risk society. Polity Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  5. Beck U (2006a) Cosmopolitan vision. Polity Press, Cambridge/Malden, MAGoogle Scholar
  6. Beck U (2006b) Reflections on reflexive governance. In: Voß JP, Bauknecht D, Kemp R (eds) Reflexive governance for sustainable development. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, pp 31–57Google Scholar
  7. Beck U (2009) World at risk. Polity Press, Cambridge/Malden, MAGoogle Scholar
  8. Biermann F (2011) Reforming global environmental governance: the case for a United Nations environment organisation (UNEO). Stakeholder Forum. Accessed 14 Oct 2011
  9. Boulding KE (1966) Economic analysis. Harper and Row, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  10. Buchanan J, Congleton RD (1998) Politics by principle, not interest. University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  11. Bulkeley H, Mol APJ (2003) Participation and environmental governance: consensus, ambivalence and debate. Environ Value 12:143–154Google Scholar
  12. Bunders JFG, Leydersdorff L (1987) The causes and consequences of collaborations between scientists and non-scientific groups. In: Blume S, Bunders JFG, Leydersdorff L, Whitley R (eds) The social direction of the public sciences, sociology of the sciences yearbook, vol XI. D.Reidel, Dordrecht, pp 331–347Google Scholar
  13. Bunders JFG, Regeer B (2009) Knowledge co-creation: interaction between science and society. RMNO, The HagueGoogle Scholar
  14. Castells M (1996) The rise of the network society, the information age: economy, society and culture, vol I. Blackwell, Cambridge/OxfordGoogle Scholar
  15. Castells M (2009) Communication power. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  16. Caswill C, Shove E (2000) Introducing interactive social science. Sci Public Policy 27(3):154–157Google Scholar
  17. Coleman S (1999) Can the new media invigorate democracy? Polit Quart 70(2):16–22Google Scholar
  18. Council of the European Union (2006) Renewed EU sustainable development strategy. Brussels, 26 June 2006Google Scholar
  19. De Bruijn H (2006) One fight, one team: the 9/11 commission report on intelligence, fragmentation and information. Public Adm 84(2):267–287Google Scholar
  20. De Bruijn JA (2007) Managing performance in the public sector, 2nd edn. Routledge, London/New York/MelbourneGoogle Scholar
  21. De Bruijn JA, Ten Heuvelhof EF (1999) Scientific expertise in complex decision-making processes. Sci Public Policy 26(3):179–184Google Scholar
  22. De Bruijn HJ, In ’t Veld RJ, Ten Heuvelhof EF (2010) Process management: why project management fails in complex decision making. Springer, HeidelbergGoogle Scholar
  23. De Zeeuw A, In ’t Veld R, Van Soest D, Meuleman L, Hoogewoning P (2008) Social cost-benefit analyses for environmental policy-making. RMNO, The HagueGoogle Scholar
  24. Defila R, Di Guilio A (1999) Evaluating trandisciplinary research. Panorama 1:1–28Google Scholar
  25. Dworkin R (2002) Sovereign virtue: the theory and practice of equality. Harvard University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  26. European Environment Agency (2001) Late lessons from early warnings: the precautionary principle 1896–2000. Environmental issue report no. 22. EEA, CopenhagenGoogle Scholar
  27. Frey BS, Jegen R (2001) Motivation crowding theory: a survey of empirical evidence. J Econ Surv 15:589–611Google Scholar
  28. Funtowicz S, Ravetz J (1991) A new scientific methodology for global environmental issues. In: Constanza R (ed) Ecological economics: the science and management of sustainability. Columbia University Press, New York, pp 137–152Google Scholar
  29. Funtowicz S, Ravetz J (1992) Three types of risk assessment and the emergence of post-normal science. In: Krimsky S, Golding D (eds) Social theories of risk. Praeger, Westport, pp 211–232Google Scholar
  30. Funtowicz S, Ravetz J (1993) Science for the post-normal age. Futures 25:739–755Google Scholar
  31. Gaber I (2007) Too much of a good thing: the “problem” of political communications in mass media democracy. J Public Aff 7:219–234Google Scholar
  32. Gallopín GC, Funtowicz S, O’Connor M, Ravetz J (2001) Science for the twenty-first century: from social contract to the scientific core. Int J Soc Sci 168(2):219–229Google Scholar
  33. Gaventa J (1991) Toward a knowledge democracy: viewpoints on participatory research in North America. In: Fals-Borda O, Rahman MA (eds) Action and knowledge: breaking the monopoly with participatory action-research. Apex Press, New York, pp 121–133Google Scholar
  34. Gaynor D (1996) Democracy in the age of information: a reconception of the public sphere. Accessed 4 Nov 2009
  35. Gee D (2008) Costs of inaction (or delayed action) to reduce exposures to hazardous agents: some lessons from history. Paper to the SCBA conference in The Hague, 17 Jan 2008Google Scholar
  36. Gee D (2009) Evaluating and communicating scientific evidence on environment and on health. Presentation to EEAC, EEA, Copenhagen, 12 June 2009Google Scholar
  37. Geels FW (2002) Technological transitions as evolutionary reconfiguration processes: a multi-level perspective and a case-study. Res Policy 31:1257–1274Google Scholar
  38. Gerstl-Pepin C (2007) Introduction to the special issue on media, democracy, and the politics of education. Peabody J Educ 82(2):1–9Google Scholar
  39. Gibbons M, Limoges C, Nowotny H, Schwartzman S, Scott P et al (1994) The new production of knowledge: the dynamics of science and research in contemporary societies. Sage, London/Thousand Oaks/New DelhiGoogle Scholar
  40. Giddens A (1991) Modernity and self-identity: self and society in the late modern age. Polity Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  41. Giddens A (2009) The politics of climate change. Polity Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  42. Grin J, Rotmans J, Schot J (2010) Transitions to sustainable development. Routledge, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  43. Hajer M (2003) Policy without polity: policy analysis and the institutional void. Policy Sci 36(2):175–195Google Scholar
  44. Hajer M (2005) Setting the stage, a dramaturgy of policy deliberation. Adm Soc 36:624–647Google Scholar
  45. Hajer M, Wagenaar H (2003) Deliberative policy analysis: understanding governance in the network society. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  46. Hirsch F (1976) Social limits to growth. Harvard University Press, CambrigeGoogle Scholar
  47. Hoogeveen H, Verkooijen P (2010) Transforming sustainable development diplomacy: lessons learned from global forest governance. Ph.D. thesis, WageningenGoogle Scholar
  48. Hoppe R (2008) Scientific advice and public policy: expert advisers’ and policy-makers’ discourses on boundary work. Poiesis Prax Int J Technol Assess Ethics Sci 6(3–4):235–263Google Scholar
  49. Hoppe R (2010) Lost in translation? A boundary work perspective on making climate change governable. In: Driessen P, Leroy P, Van Viersen W (eds) From climate change to social change: perspectives on science-policy interactions. Earthscan, LondonGoogle Scholar
  50. Hoppe R (2011) The governance of problems: puzzling, powering, and participation. Policy Press, BristolGoogle Scholar
  51. In ’t Veld RJ (ed) (2000/2009) Willingly and knowingly: the roles of knowledge about nature and the environment in policy processes. RMNO, The HagueGoogle Scholar
  52. In ’t Veld RJ (ed) (2001/2008) The rehabilitation of Cassandra: a methodological discourse on future research for environmental and spatial policy. WRR/RMNO/NRLO, The HagueGoogle Scholar
  53. In ’t Veld RJ (2009) Towards knowledge democracy. Consequences for science, politics and media. Paper for the international conference towards knowledge democracy, Leiden, 25–27 AugGoogle Scholar
  54. In ’t Veld RJ (ed) (2010) Towards knowledge democracy. Consequences for science, politics and media. Springer, HeidelbergGoogle Scholar
  55. In ’t Veld RJ (2010b) Kennisdemocratie. SDU, The HagueGoogle Scholar
  56. In ’t Veld RJ, Verhey AJM (2000/2009) Willingly and knowingly: about the relationship between values, knowledge production and use of knowledge in environmental policy. In: In ’t Veld RJ (ed) Willingly and knowingly: the roles of knowledge about nature and environment in policy processes. RMNO, The Hague, pp 105–145Google Scholar
  57. In ’t Veld RJ, Maassen van den Brink H, Morin P, Van Rij V, Van der Veen H et al (eds) (2007) Horizon scan report 2007: towards a future oriented policy and knowledge agenda. COS, The HagueGoogle Scholar
  58. Jasanoff S (1990) The fifth branch: advisers as policy makers. Harvard University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  59. Jasanoff S (2003) Technologies of humility: citizen participation in governing science. Minerva 41:223–244Google Scholar
  60. Jasanoff S (ed) (2004) States of knowledge: the co-production of science and social order. Routledge, London/New YorkGoogle Scholar
  61. Jasanoff S (2005) Designs on nature: science and democracy in Europe and the United States. Princeton University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
  62. Jungcurt S (2012) Taking boundary work seriously: towards a systematic approach to the analysis 3 of interactions between knowledge production and decision-making on sustainable development.  Chapter 7 in the volume
  63. Kickert WJM, Koppenjan JFM, Klijn EH (1997) Managing complex networks: strategies for the public sector. Sage, LondonGoogle Scholar
  64. Lindblom CE, Cohen DK (1979) Usable knowledge: social science and social problem solving. Yale University Press, New HavenGoogle Scholar
  65. Meuleman L (2008) Public management and the metagovernance of hierarchies, networks and markets. Springer, HeidelbergGoogle Scholar
  66. Meuleman L (2010) The cultural dimension of metagovernance: why governance doctrines may fail. Public Organ Rev 10(1):49–70. doi: 10.1007/s11115-009-0088-5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Meuleman L (2010b) Metagovernance of climate policies: moving towards more variation. Paper presented at the Unitar/Yale conference. Strengthening institutions to address climate change and advance a green economy, Yale University, New Haven, 17–19 Sept 2010Google Scholar
  68. Meuleman L (2011) Metagoverning governance styles: broadening the public manager’s action perspective. In: Torfing J, Triantafillou P (eds) Interactive policy making, metagovernance and democracy. ECPR Press, Colchester, pp 95–110Google Scholar
  69. Meuleman L (2012a) Cultural diversity and sustainability metagovernance. In: Meuleman L (ed) Transgovernance: advancing sustainability governance. Springer, HeidelbergGoogle Scholar
  70. Meuleman L (ed) (2012b) Transgovernance: advancing sustainability governance. Springer, HeidelbergGoogle Scholar
  71. Meuleman L, In ’t Veld RJ (2009) Sustainable development and the governance of long-term decisions. RMNO/EEAC, The HagueGoogle Scholar
  72. Napolitano J (2012) Development, sustainability and international politics. In: Meuleman L (ed) Transgovernance: advancing sustainability governance. Springer, HeidelbergGoogle Scholar
  73. Newman P, Kenworthy J (1999) Sustainability and cities: overcoming automobile dependence. Island Press, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  74. Nowotny H, Scott P, Gibbons M (2002) Re-thinking science: knowledge and the public in an age of uncertainty. Polity Press, Cambridge, UKGoogle Scholar
  75. Nussbaum MC (2006) Frontiers of justice. Belknap, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  76. Perez-Carmona A (2012) Growth: a discussion of the margins of economic and ecological thought. In: Meuleman L (ed) Transgovernance: advancing sustainability governance. Springer, HeidelbergGoogle Scholar
  77. Petschow U, Rosenau J, Von Weizsaecker EU (2005) Governance and sustainability. Greenleaf, SheffoeldGoogle Scholar
  78. Peverelli P, Verduyn K (2010) Understanding the basic dynamics of organizing. Eburon, DelftGoogle Scholar
  79. Pohl C, Hirsch Hadorn G (2007) Principles for designing transciplinary research, proposed by the Swiss academies of arts and sciences. Oekom, MünchenGoogle Scholar
  80. Pohl C, Hirsch Hadorn G (2008) Methodological challenges of transdisciplinary research. Natures Scoiences Sociétés 16(1):111–121Google Scholar
  81. Polanyi K (1944) The great transformation: the political and economic origins of our time. Beacon Press, BostonGoogle Scholar
  82. Pollitt C, Bouckaert G (2000) Public management reform: a comparative analysis. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  83. Putnam RD (2002) Democracies in flux: the evolution of social capital in contemporary society. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  84. Regeer B, Bunders JFG (2009) Knowledge co-creation: interaction between science and society. RMNO, The HagueGoogle Scholar
  85. Regeer B, Mager S, Van Oorsouw Y (2011) Licence to grow. VU University Press, AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
  86. Rockström J, Steffen W, Noone K, Persson Å, Chapin FS III, Lambin E et al (2009) Planetary boundaries: exploring the safe operating space for humanity. Ecol Soc 14(2):32Google Scholar
  87. Rosenau J (2005) Stability, stasis, and change: a fragmegrating world. In the global century: globalization and national security, vol I. National Defense University Press, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  88. Schmidt F (2012) Governing planetary boundaries – limiting or enabling conditions for transitions towards sustainability? In: Meuleman L (ed) Transgovernance: advancing sustainability governance. Springer, HeidelbergGoogle Scholar
  89. Scholz RW (2011) Environmental literacy in science and society: from knowledge to decision. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  90. Scholz RW, Stauffacher M (2007) Managing transition in clusters: area development negotiations as a tool for sustaining traditional industries in a Swiss prealpine region. Environ Plann A 39:2518–2539Google Scholar
  91. Schumpeter J (1943) Capitalism, socialism and democracy. Allen and Unwin, LondenGoogle Scholar
  92. Schwarz M, Elffers J (2011) Sustainism is the new modernism. DAP, New York. See also:
  93. Selin H, Najam A (eds) (2011) Beyond Rio + 20: governance for a green economy. Boston University Press, BostonGoogle Scholar
  94. Sen AK (1999) Development as freedom. Knopf, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  95. Stakeholder Forum (2011) Environmental institutions for the 21st century: an international court for the environment. ICE Coalition. Retrieved from
  96. Stern N (2006) Stern review on the economics of climate change. HM Treasury, LondonGoogle Scholar
  97. Surowiecki J (2004) The wisdom of crowds: why the many are smarter than the few and how collective wisdom shapes business, economics, society and nations. Little Brown, LondonGoogle Scholar
  98. Teisman GR, Van Buuren MW, Gerrits L (2009) Managing complex governance systems. Routledge, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  99. Thompson M, Ellis RE, Wildavsky A (1990) Cultural theory. Westview Press, BoulderGoogle Scholar
  100. Tuchman BW (1984) The March of folly: from Troy to Vietnam. Random House of Canada, OntarioGoogle Scholar
  101. UN-DESA (2011) The transition to a green economy: benefits, challenges and risks from a sustainable development perspective. United Nations, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  102. UNDP (2007) Governance for sustainable human development. New York, UNDPGoogle Scholar
  103. UNEP (2011) Towards a green economy. UNEP, NairobiGoogle Scholar
  104. UNESCO (2001), Universal declaration on cultural diversity. Paris, 2 November 2001Google Scholar
  105. United Nations Habitat (2011) Global report on human settlements 2011 – cities and climate change. Nairobi, KenyaGoogle Scholar
  106. Van Londen S, De Ruijter A (2011) Sustainable diversity. In: Janssens M, Bechtoldt M, De Ruijter A, Pinelli D, Prarolo G, Stenius V (eds) The sustainability of cultural diversity. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, pp 3–31Google Scholar
  107. Van Twist MJ, Termeer CJ (1991) Introduction to configuration approach: a process theory for societal steering. In: In ’t Veld RJ, Termeer CJAM, Schaap L, Van Twist MJW (eds) Autopoiesis and configuration theory: new approaches to societal steering. Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht, pp 19–30Google Scholar
  108. Voß J, Bauknecht D, Kemp R (2006) Reflexive governance for sustainable development. Edward Elgar, CheltenhamGoogle Scholar
  109. Walker B, Holling CS, Carpenter SR, Kinzig A (2004) Resilience, adaptability and transformability in social-ecological systems. Ecol Soc 9(2):5Google Scholar
  110. Walter A, Helgenberger S, Wiek A, Scholz RW (2007) Measuring societal effects of transdisciplinary research projects: design and application of an evaluation method. Eval Program Plann 30:325–338Google Scholar
  111. WBCSD (2010) Vision 2050: the new agenda for business. WBCSD, GenevaGoogle Scholar
  112. WBGU (2011) Welt im Wandel: Gesellschaftsvertrag für eine Große Transformation. WBGU, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  113. Weber L (1979) L’Analyse économique des dépenses publiques. Presses Universitaires de France, ParisGoogle Scholar
  114. Webler T, Tuler S (2000) Fairness and competence in citizen participation: theoretical reflections from a case study. Adm Soc 32(5):566–595Google Scholar
  115. Weick K (1995) Sensemaking in organisations. Sage, LondonGoogle Scholar
  116. Weick KE, Sutcliffe KM (2001) Managing the unexpected: assuring high performance in an age of complexity. Jossey-Bass, San FranciscoGoogle Scholar
  117. Weinberg A (1972) Science and trans-science. Minerva 33:209–222Google Scholar
  118. Weingart P (1999) Scientific expertise and political accountability: paradoxes of science in politics. Sci Public Policy 26:151–161Google Scholar
  119. Wynne B (1991) Knowledges in context. Sci Technol Hum Value 16:111–121Google Scholar
  120. Wynne B (1996) May the sheep safely graze? A reflexive view of the expert-lay knowledge divide. In: Lash S, Szerszynski B, Wynne B (eds) Risk, environment and modernity, towards a new ecology. Sage, London/Thousand Oaks/New DelhiGoogle Scholar
  121. Wynne B (2006) Public engagement as a means of restoring public trust in science – hitting the notes, but missing the music? Community Genet 9:211–220Google Scholar
  122. Wynne B (2007) Risky delusions: misunderstanding science and misperforming publics in the GE crops issue. In: Taylor I, Barrett K (eds) Genetic engineering: decision making under uncertainty. University of British Columbia Press, VancouverGoogle Scholar
  123. Yearley S (2000) Making systematic sense of public discontents with expert knowledge: two analytical approaches and a case study. Public Underst Sci 9:105–122Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2013

Open Access. This chapter is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.LeiderdorpNetherlands

Personalised recommendations