Advertisement

Governing Planetary Boundaries: Limiting or Enabling Conditions for Transitions Towards Sustainability?

  • Falk Schmidt
Chapter

Abstract

It seems intuitive to identify boundaries of an earth system which is increasingly threatened by human activities. Being aware of and hence studying boundaries may be necessary for effective governance of sustainable development. Can the planetary boundaries function as useful ‘warning signs’ in this respect? The answer presented in the article is: yes; but. It is argued that these boundaries cannot be described exclusively by scientific knowledge-claims. They have to be identified by science-society or transdisciplinary deliberations. The discussion of governance challenges related to the concept concludes with two main recommendations: to better institutionalise integrative transdisciplinary assessment processes along the lines of the interconnected nature of the planetary boundaries, and to foster cross-sectoral linkages in order to institutionalise more integrative and yet context sensitive governance arrangements. These insights are briefly confronted with options for institutional reform in the context of the Rio + 20 process. If humankind will not manage a transition towards sustainability, its ‘safe operating space’ continues shrinking. Governance arrangements for such ‘systems at risk’ may then be, first, more ‘forceful’ and, second, may run counter to our understanding of ‘open societies’. It is not very realistic that the world is prepared to achieve the first, and it is not desirable to get the effects of the latter. Scholars and practitioners of sustainability may find this a convincing argument to act now.

Keywords

Governance Arrangement Issue Area Governance Reform Governance Response Climate Engineering 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Notes

Acknowledgements

This paper benefitted from the reviews done by Professor Ernst U. von Weizsaecker and Dr. Louis Lebel, and comments by Professor Oran R. Young. The full responsibility for remaining inconsistencies and possible shortcomings stays with me as author.

Open Access. This chapter is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.

References

  1. Bachmann G (2012) Emergency response – clustering change. In: Meuleman L (ed) Transgovernance: advancing sustainability governance. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 301–326Google Scholar
  2. Baumgartner T (2011) UN-water and its role in global water governance. Global water news. GWSP focus 2011: global water governance, pp 5–6Google Scholar
  3. Beck U (2006) Reflexive governance: politics in the global risk society. In: Voß J-P, Bauknecht D, Kemp R (eds) Reflexive governance for sustainable development. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, pp 31–56Google Scholar
  4. Beck U (2010) Climate for change, or how to create a green modernity? Theory Cult Soc 27(2–3):254–266CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Beisheim M, Lode B, Simon N (2011) Ein Rat für Nachhaltige Entwicklung. Vor der Rio-Konferenz 2012: Optionen zur Reform der VN-Nachhaltigkeitsinsitutionen, SWP-Aktuell 2011/A 46, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  6. Berkhout F (2010) Reconstructing boundaries and reason in the climate debate. Glob Environ Chang 20(4):565–569CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Berkhout F, Angel D, Wieczorek A (2009) Asian development pathways and sustainable socio-technical regimes. Technol Forecast Soc Chang 76(2):218–228CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Biermann F (2010) Beyond the intergovernmental regime: recent trends in global carbon governance. Curr Opin Environ Sustain 2:284–288CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Biermann F, Bauer S (eds) (2005) A world environment organization. Solution or threat for effective international environmental governance? Ashgate, Aldershot/BurlingtonGoogle Scholar
  10. Biermann F, Simonis UE (1998) Eine Weltorganisation für Umwelt und Entwicklung. Funktionen, Chancen, Probleme SEF policy paper no. 9, BonnGoogle Scholar
  11. Breitmeier H, Young OR, Zürn M (2006) Analyzing international environmental regimes: from case study to database. MIT Press, Cambridge, MACrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Brown LR (2011) Plan B 3.0. mobilization to save civilization. W.W. Norton, New York/LondonGoogle Scholar
  13. Conca K (2006) Governing water: contentious transnational politics and global institution building. MIT Press, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  14. Dessai S, Hulme M, Lempert R, Pielke R (2009) Climate prediction: a limit to adaptation? In: Adger N, Lorenzoni I, O’Brien K (eds) Adapting to climate change: thresholds, values, governance. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, pp 64–78CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Duit A, Galaz V, Eckerberg K, Ebbesson J (2010) Governance, complexity, and resilience. Glob Environ Chang 20(3):363–368CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. FAO (2011) The status of the world’s land and water resources for food and agriculture: managing systems at risk. FAO, RomeGoogle Scholar
  17. Folke C (2006) Resilience. The emergence of a perspective for social-ecological system analysis. Glob Environ Chang 16(3):253–267CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Geden O (2010) Was kommt nach dem Zwei-Grad-Ziel? Die EU-Klimapolitik sollte für flexible Orientierungsmarken eintreten. SWP-Aktuell 2010/A 55, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  19. Gehring T, Oberthür S (2008) Interplay: exploring institutional interaction. In: Young OR, King L, Schroeder H (eds) Institutions and environmental change: principle findings, applications, and research frontiers. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, pp 187–224CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Grin J, Rotmans J, Schot JW (2010) Transitions to sustainable development: Routledge studies in sustainability transitions. Routledge, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Gupta J (2008) Global change: analyzing scale and scaling in environmental governance. In: Young OR, King L, Schroeder H (eds) Institutions and environmental change: principle findings, applications, and research frontiers. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, pp 225–276CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hoekstra A (2006) The global dimension of water governance: nine reasons for global arrangements in order to cope with local water problems. The value of water research report series by UNESCO-IHE, DelftGoogle Scholar
  23. Hoff H (2009) Global water resources and their management. Curr Opin Environ Sustain 1(2):141–147CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Hulme M (2010) Problems with making and governing global kinds of knowledge. Glob Environ Chang 20(4):558–564CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Hulme M (2010b) Cosmopolitan climates: hybridity, foresight and meaning. Theory Cult Soc 27(2–3):267–276CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. In ’t Veld RJ (2012) Transgovernance: the quest for governance of sustainable development. IASS, PotsdamGoogle Scholar
  27. Ingram J, Ericksen P, Liverman D (2010) Food security and global environmental change. Earthscan, LondonGoogle Scholar
  28. Jaeger CC, Jaeger J (2010) Warum zwei Grad? Aus Polit Zeitges (32–33):8–15, BonnGoogle Scholar
  29. Jasanoff S (2010) A new climate for society. Theory Cult Soc 27(2–3):233–253CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Jungcurt S (2012) Taking boundary work seriously: towards a systemic approach to the analysis of interactions between knowledge production and decision-making on sustainable development. In: Meuleman L (ed) Transgovernance: advancing sustainability governance. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 332–351Google Scholar
  31. Kaasa SM (2007) The UN Commission on sustainable development: which mechanisms explain its accomplishments? Glob Environ Polit 7(3):107–129CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Karlsson-Vinkhuyzen S (2010) The United Nations and global energy governance: past challenges, future choices. Glob Chang Peace Secur 22(2):175–195CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Lenton TM, Held H, Kriegler E, Hall JW, Lucht W, Rahmsdorf S, Schellnhuber HJ (2007) Tipping elements in the Earth’s climate system. Proc Natl Acad Sci 105:1786–1793CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Meuleman L (2012) Cultural diversity and sustainability metagovernance. In: Meuleman L (ed) Transgovernance: advancing sustainability governance. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 60–118Google Scholar
  35. Neumayer E (2001) How regime theory and the economic theory of international environmental cooperation can learn from each other. Glob Environ Polit 1:122–147CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. O’Brien K, St Clair AL, Kristoffersen B, O’Brien K, St Clair AL (2010) Towards a new science on climate change. In: Kristoffersen B (ed) Climate change, ethics and human security. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 215–227CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Oberthür S, Stokke OS (2011) Managing institutional complexity. Regime interplay and global environmental change. MIT Press, Cambridge, MACrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Pahl-Wostl C, Gupta J, Petry D (2008) Governance and the global water system: towards a theoretical exploration. Glob Gov 14:419–436Google Scholar
  39. Pattberg P, Stripple J (2008) Beyond the public and private divide: remapping transnational climate governance in the 21st century. Int Environ Agreements Polit Law Econ 8(4):367–388CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Rechkemmer A (2004) Postmodern global governance: The United Nations convention to combat desertification. Nomos, Baden-BadenGoogle Scholar
  41. Rockström J, Steffen W, Noone K, Persson Å, Chapin S, Lambin E et al (2009a) Planetary boundaries. Exploring the safe operating space for humanity. Ecol Soc 14/2:32. http://bit.ly/6Z3Wmg. Accessed 20 Oct 2011. Also published as Feature in (2009) Nature 461:472–475Google Scholar
  42. Rockstrom J et al (2009b) Supplementary information (related to Rockstrom et al. 2009a). http://bit.ly/sisHcn. Accessed 20 Oct 2011
  43. Schmidt F (2011) Auf dem Weg zu einem globalen Wasserregime. Regimetheoretische Erklärungen und praktische Anforderungen nach 30 Jahren globaler Wasserpolitik. Dissertational thesis. Freie Universität BerlinGoogle Scholar
  44. Simon N (2010) Internationale Umweltgovernance für das 21. Jahrhundert. Herausforderungen und Reformprozesse vor der Rio-Konferenz 2012. SWP-Studien 2010/S30, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  45. Steffen W, Sanderson A, Jäger J, Tyson PD, Moore B, Matson PA et al (2004) Global change and the earth system: a planet under pressure. Springer, Berlin/HeidelbergGoogle Scholar
  46. Steffen W, Rockström J, Costanza R (2011) How defining planetary boundaries can transform our approach to growth. Solutions 2(3). http://www.thesolutionsjournal.com/node/935 2(3)
  47. Turner BL, Kasperson RE, Meyer WB, Dow KM, Golding D, Kasperson JX et al (1990) Two types of global environmental change: definitional and spatial-scale issues in their human dimensions. Glob Environ Chang 1(1):14–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Underdal A (2010) Complexity and challenges of long-term environmental governance. Glob Environ Chang 20(4):386–393CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Vlek P (2005) Nothing begets nothing. The creeping disaster of land degradation. InterSecTions no. 1, UNU-EHS, BonnGoogle Scholar
  50. Von Storch H, Bray D (2010) Against politization of science. Comment on S. Keller: szientization: putting global climate change on the scientific agenda since 1970 and the role of the IPCC. Poiesis Prax 7(3):211–219CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Walker B, Barrett SA, Polasky S, Galaz V, Folke C, Engström G (2009) Looming global-scale failures and missing institutions. Science 325(5946):1345–1346CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Wissenschaftlicher Beitrat der Bundesregierung Globale Umweltveränderungen (WBGU) (2009) Kassensturz für den Weltklimavertrag – Der Budgetansatz. WBGU, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  53. Wissenschaftlicher Beitrat der Bundesregierung Globale Umweltveränderungen (WBGU) (2011) Gesellschaftsvertrag für eine Große Transformation. WBGU, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  54. World Water Assessment Programme (WWAP) (2009) The United Nations world water development report 3: water in a changing world. Earthscan, Paris/LondonGoogle Scholar
  55. Young OR (1994) International governance: protecting the environment in a stateless society. Cornell University Press, IthacaGoogle Scholar
  56. Young OR (1999) Governance in world affairs. Cornell University Press, IthacaGoogle Scholar
  57. Young OR (2002) The institutional dimensions of environmental change, fit, interplay, and scale. MIT Press, Cambridge, MACrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Young OR (2008a) Building regimes for socioecological systems: institutional diagnostics. In: Young OR, King L, Schroeder H (eds) Institutions and environmental change: principle findings, applications, and research frontiers. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, pp 115–144CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Young OR (2008b) The architecture of global environmental governance: bringing science to bear on policy. Glob Environ Polit 8(1):14–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Young OR (2008c) Reflections on energy, sustainability and societal change. In: Energy, sustainability, and societal change. IHDP special issue science policy dialogues, Bonn, International Human Dimensions Programme on Global Environmental Change, pp 7–10Google Scholar
  61. Young OR (2010) Institutional dynamics: patters of change in international environmental regimes. MIT Press, Cambridge, MACrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Zelli F (2008) Regime conflicts in global environmental governance. A framework for analysis. Global governance working paper no. 36 July 2008. The global governance project. www.glogov.org. Accessed 2 Aug 2011
  63. Zürn M (1998) Regieren jenseits des Nationalstaates. Globalisierung und Denationalisierung als Chance. Suhrkamp, Frankfurt, Edition Zweite ModerneGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2013

Open Access. This chapter is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Academic Officer in the Executive Office of IASSPotsdamGermany

Personalised recommendations